Hannah Schmitz1, Carol L Howe2, David G Armstrong3, Vignesh Subbian1,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. 2. Health Sciences Library, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aims to analyze current capabilities, challenges, and impact of self-directed mobile health (mHealth) research applications such as those based on the ResearchKit platform. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. English publications were included if: 1) mobile applications were used in the context of large-scale collection of data for biomedical research, and not as medical or behavioral intervention of any kind, and 2) all activities related to participating in research and data collection methods were executed remotely without any face-to-face interaction between researchers and study participants. Results: Thirty-six unique ResearchKit apps were identified. The majority of the apps were used to conduct observational studies on general citizens and generate large datasets for secondary research. Nearly half of the apps were focused on chronic conditions in adults. Discussion: The ability to generate large biomedical datasets on diverse populations that can be broadly shared and re-used was identified as a promising feature of mHealth research apps. Common challenges were low participation retention, uncertainty regarding how use patterns influence data quality, need for data validation, and privacy concerns. Conclusion: ResearchKit and other mHealth-based studies are well positioned to enhance development and validation of novel digital biomarkers as well as generate new biomedical knowledge through retrospective studies. However, in order to capitalize on these benefits, mHealth research studies must strive to improve retention rates, implement rigorous data validation strategies, and address emerging privacy and security challenges.
Objective: This systematic review aims to analyze current capabilities, challenges, and impact of self-directed mobile health (mHealth) research applications such as those based on the ResearchKit platform. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. English publications were included if: 1) mobile applications were used in the context of large-scale collection of data for biomedical research, and not as medical or behavioral intervention of any kind, and 2) all activities related to participating in research and data collection methods were executed remotely without any face-to-face interaction between researchers and study participants. Results: Thirty-six unique ResearchKit apps were identified. The majority of the apps were used to conduct observational studies on general citizens and generate large datasets for secondary research. Nearly half of the apps were focused on chronic conditions in adults. Discussion: The ability to generate large biomedical datasets on diverse populations that can be broadly shared and re-used was identified as a promising feature of mHealth research apps. Common challenges were low participation retention, uncertainty regarding how use patterns influence data quality, need for data validation, and privacy concerns. Conclusion: ResearchKit and other mHealth-based studies are well positioned to enhance development and validation of novel digital biomarkers as well as generate new biomedical knowledge through retrospective studies. However, in order to capitalize on these benefits, mHealth research studies must strive to improve retention rates, implement rigorous data validation strategies, and address emerging privacy and security challenges.
Authors: Yu-Feng Yvonne Chan; Pei Wang; Linda Rogers; Nicole Tignor; Micol Zweig; Steven G Hershman; Nicholas Genes; Erick R Scott; Eric Krock; Marcus Badgeley; Ron Edgar; Samantha Violante; Rosalind Wright; Charles A Powell; Joel T Dudley; Eric E Schadt Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Nasser F BinDhim; Ahmed M Shaman; Lyndal Trevena; Mada H Basyouni; Lisa G Pont; Tariq M Alhawassi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Elias Chaibub Neto; Brian M Bot; Thanneer Perumal; Larsson Omberg; Justin Guinney; Mike Kellen; Arno Klein; Stephen H Friend; Andrew D Trister Journal: Pac Symp Biocomput Date: 2016
Authors: Dan E Webster; Christine Suver; Megan Doerr; Erin Mounts; Lisa Domenico; Tracy Petrie; Sancy A Leachman; Andrew D Trister; Brian M Bot Journal: Sci Data Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Yu-Feng Yvonne Chan; Brian M Bot; Micol Zweig; Nicole Tignor; Weiping Ma; Christine Suver; Rafhael Cedeno; Erick R Scott; Steven Gregory Hershman; Eric E Schadt; Pei Wang Journal: Sci Data Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Jennifer M Radin; Steven R Steinhubl; Andrew I Su; Hansa Bhargava; Benjamin Greenberg; Brian M Bot; Megan Doerr; Eric J Topol Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2018-09-05
Authors: Colin G Walsh; Beenish Chaudhry; Prerna Dua; Kenneth W Goodman; Bonnie Kaplan; Ramakanth Kavuluru; Anthony Solomonides; Vignesh Subbian Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2020-01-22
Authors: Zachary Wyner; Sascha Dublin; Christina Chambers; Shyam Deval; Chayim Herzig-Marx; Shanthala Rao; Adam Rauch; Juliane Reynolds; Jeffrey S Brown; David Martin Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2020-12-11