Literature DB >> 30443399

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of ethyl 2-{4-[(3-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-di-hydro-quinoxalin-1-yl)meth-yl]-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl}acetate.

Nadeem Abad1, Youssef Ramli2, Tuncer Hökelek3, Nada Kheira Sebbar4, Joel T Mague5, El Mokhtar Essassi1.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C16H17N5O3, is build up from two fused six-membered rings linked to a 1,2,3-triazole ring, which is attached to an ethyl azido-acetate group. The di-hydro-qinoxalinone portion is planar to within 0.0512 (12) Å and is oriented at a dihedral angle of 87.83 (5)° with respect to the pendant triazole ring. In the crystal, a combination of inter-molecular C-H⋯O and C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds together with slipped π-stacking [centroid-centroid distance = 3.7772 (12) Å] and C-H⋯π (ring) inter-actions lead to the formation of chains extending along the c-axis direction. Additional C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link these chains into layers parallel to the bc plane and the layers are tied together by complementary π-stacking [centroid-centroid distance = 3.5444 (12) Å] inter-actions. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (44.5%), H⋯O/O⋯H (18.8%), H⋯N/N⋯H (17.0%) and H⋯C/C⋯H (10.4%) inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface; crystal structure; di­hydro­quinoxaline; hydrogen bond; π-stacking

Year:  2018        PMID: 30443399      PMCID: PMC6218907          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Quinoxaline derivatives, especially quinoxalinone, are of great importance in medicinal chemistry (Ramli & Essassi, 2015 ▸; Ramli et al., 2017 ▸) and can be used for the synthesis of numerous heterocyclic compounds with various biological activities such as anti­bacterial (Griffith et al., 1992 ▸), HIV (Loriga et al., 1997 ▸), anti­microbial (Badran et al., 2003 ▸), anti-inflammatory (Wagle et al., 2008 ▸), anti­protozoal (Hui et al., 2006 ▸), and anti­cancer (Carta et al., 2006 ▸). In a continuation of our research work devoted to the study of cyclo­addition reactions involving quinoxaline derivatives (Ramli et al., 2011 ▸, 2013 ▸; Abad et al., 2018 ▸; Sebbar et al., 2016 ▸), we report in this work the synthesis, using 3-methyl-1-(prop-2-yn­yl)-3,4-di­hydro­quinoxalin-2(1H)-one as dipolarophile and ethyl azido acetate as 1,3-dipole, and crystal structure of ethyl 2-{4-[(3-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-di­hydro­quinoxalin-1-yl)meth­yl]-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl}acetate, C16H17N5O3 (Fig. 1 ▸).
Figure 1

The title mol­ecule with the labelling scheme and 50% probability ellipsoids.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecule of the title compound is build up from two fused six-membered rings linked to a 1,2,3-triazole ring which is attached to ethyl azido­acetate group (Fig. 1 ▸) (Sebbar et al., 2014 ▸; Ellouz et al., 2015 ▸). Atoms C8 and N2 are displaced from the mean plane through the di­hydro­quinoxalinone unit by 0.0367 (13) and −0.0512 (12) Å, respectively, with the remaining atoms within 0.0222 (15) Å of the plane (r.m.s deviation of the fitted atoms is 0.0234 Å). The pendant triazole ring is inclined to this plane by 87.83 (5)°.

Supra­molecular features

Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals contacts are the dominant inter­actions in the crystal packing. In the crystal, C—HDhyqnx⋯OEthazac, C—HEthazac⋯ODhyqnx, C5—HDhyqnx⋯NEthazac and C—HTrz⋯NDhyqnx (Dhyqnx = di­hydro­quinoxalin, Ethazac = ethyl azido­acetate and Trz = triazol) hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) form chains extending along the c-axis direction (Figs. 2 ▸ and 3 ▸). These are reinforced by slipped π-stacking inter­actions between inversion-related A (N1/N2/C1/C6–C8) rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.7772 (12) Å] and by complementary C—HDhyqnx⋯Cg3 inter­actions [Cg3 is the centroid of the benzene ring B (C1–C6)] (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 2 ▸). The chains are linked into layers parallel to the bc plane by sets of four C—HDhyqnx⋯OEthazac hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 3 ▸) with the layers linked along the a-axis direction by inversion-related slipped π-stacking inter­actions between the A and B rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.5444 (12) Å] (Fig. 2 ▸).
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg3 is the centroid of the benzene (C1–C6) ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C5—H5⋯N4xi 0.974 (19)2.48 (2)3.401 (3)157.9 (15)
C9—H9B⋯O2iv 0.97 (2)2.59 (2)3.508 (3)156.9 (18)
C12—H12⋯N1iv 0.935 (18)2.431 (19)3.365 (2)177.6 (16)
C13—H13A⋯O1i 0.99 (2)2.36 (2)3.318 (2)162.5 (16)
C13—H13B⋯N3i 1.027 (18)2.672 (19)3.481 (2)135.6 (13)
C9—H9CCg3iv 1.00 (2)2.67 (2)3.430 (2)132.0 (15)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (iv) ; (xi) .

Figure 2

Detail of the inter­molecular inter­actions viewed along the b-axis direction. C—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are shown, respectively, by black and purple dashed lines. Slipped π-stacking and C—H⋯π (ring) inter­actions are shown, respectively, by orange and green dashed lines.

Figure 3

Plane view of one layer along the a-axis direction with inter­molecular inter­actions depicted as in Fig. 2 ▸.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

Visualization and exploration of inter­molecular close contacts in the crystal structure of the title compound is invaluable. Thus, a Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis (Hirshfeld, 1977 ▸; Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸) was carried out by using CrystalExplorer17.5 (Turner et al., 2017 ▸) to investigate the locations of atom–atom short contacts with the potential to form hydrogen bonds and the qu­anti­tative ratios of these inter­actions as well as those of the π-stacking inter­actions. In the HS plotted over d norm (Fig. 4 ▸), the white surface indicates contacts with distances equal to the sum of van der Waals radii, while the red and blue colours indicate distances shorter (in close contact) or longer (distinct contact) than the van der Waals radii, respectively (Venkatesan et al., 2016 ▸). The bright-red spots appearing near O1, O2, N1, N3 and hydrogen atoms H5, H4, H9B and H12 indicate their roles as the respective donors and acceptors in the dominant C—H⋯O and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds; they also appear as blue and red regions corresponding to positive and negative potentials on the HS mapped over electrostatic potential (Spackman et al., 2008 ▸; Jayatilaka et al., 2005 ▸) shown in Fig. 5 ▸. The blue regions indicate positive electrostatic potential (hydrogen-bond donors), while the red regions indicate negative electrostatic potential (hydrogen-bond acceptors).
Figure 4

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over d norm in the range −0.2685 to 1.3470 a.u.

Figure 5

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over electrostatic potential energy in the range −0.0500 to 0.0500 a.u. using the STO-3 G basis set at the Hartree–Fock level of theory. Hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors are shown as blue and red regions around the atoms, corresponding to positive and negative potentials, respectively.

The shape-index of the HS is a tool to visualize π–π stacking inter­actions by the presence of adjacent red and blue triangles; if there are no adjacent red and/or blue triangles, then there are no π–π inter­actions. Fig. 6 ▸ clearly suggest that there are π–π inter­actions present in the title compound.
Figure 6

Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over shape-index.

The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot is shown in Fig. 7 ▸ a and those delineated into H⋯H, H⋯O/O⋯H, H⋯N/N⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯ H, C⋯C, N⋯C/C⋯N, O⋯C/C⋯O and N⋯N contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) are illustrated in Fig. 7 ▸ b–i, respectively, together with their relative contributions to the Hirshfeld surface. The most important inter­action is H⋯H contributing 44.5% to the overall crystal packing, which is reflected in Fig. 7 ▸ b as widely scattered points of high density due to the large hydrogen content of the mol­ecule. The wide peak in the centre at d e = d i = 1.18 Å in Fig. 7 ▸ b is due to the short inter­atomic H⋯H contacts (Table 2 ▸). In the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯O/O⋯H contacts Fig. 7 ▸ c, the 18.8% contribution to the HS arises from the inter­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonding (Table 1 ▸) besides the H⋯O/O⋯H contacts (Table 2 ▸) and is viewed as pair of spikes with the tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.27 Å. The H⋯N/N⋯H contacts in the structure with 17.0% contribution to the HS have a symmetrical distribution of points, Fig. 7 ▸ d, with the tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.30 Å arising from the short inter­atomic C—H⋯N hydrogen bonding (Table 1 ▸) as well as from the H⋯N/N⋯H contacts (Table 3 ▸). The presence of a weak C—H⋯π inter­action (Table 1 ▸) results in two pairs of characteristic wings in the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯C/C⋯H contacts with a 10.4% contribution to the HS, Fig. 7 ▸ e, while the two pairs of thin and thick edges at d e + d i ∼ 2.77 and 2.67 Å, respectively, result from the inter­atomic H⋯C/C⋯H contacts (Table 2 ▸). The inter­atomic C⋯C contacts (Table 2 ▸) with a 3.6% contribution to the HS appear as an arrow-shaped distribution of points in Fig. 7 ▸ f, with the vertex at d e = d i = 1.71 Å. Finally, the C⋯N/N⋯C (Fig. 7 ▸ g) contacts (Table 3 ▸) in the structure, with a 3.2% contribution to the HS, have a symmetrical distribution of points, with a pair of wings appearing at d e = d i = 1.67 Å. The Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm plotted are shown for the H⋯H, H⋯O/O⋯H, H⋯N/N⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, C⋯C and C⋯N/N⋯C inter­actions in Fig. 8 ▸ a–f, respectively.
Figure 7

The full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) H⋯O/O⋯H, (d) H⋯N/N⋯H, (e) H⋯C/C⋯H, (f) C⋯C, (g) C⋯N/N⋯C, (h) O⋯C/C⋯O and (i) N⋯N inter­actions. The d i and d e values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface contacts.

Table 2

Selected interatomic distances (Å)

O1⋯C113.394 (3)N3⋯H13B i 2.672 (19)
O1⋯C13i 3.318 (3)N4⋯C5ix 3.401 (3)
O1⋯C15ii 3.116 (3)N4⋯H5ix 2.48 (2)
O1⋯C16ii 3.360 (3)C1⋯C6vii 3.521 (3)
O1⋯H9A 2.74 (3)C1⋯C123.519 (3)
O1⋯H10A 2.35 (2)C2⋯C7vii 3.459 (3)
O1⋯H13A i 2.36 (2)C2⋯C113.397 (3)
O1⋯H15A ii 2.61 (2)C2⋯H10B 2.63 (2)
O1⋯H16A ii 2.71 (2)C3⋯C9vii 3.574 (3)
O2⋯N52.772 (2)C3⋯H9A vii 2.81 (2)
O2⋯C4iii 3.409 (3)C4⋯C8vii 3.569 (3)
O2⋯C123.186 (2)C5⋯C8vii 3.545 (3)
O2⋯H4iii 2.55 (2)C5⋯C10vii 3.548 (3)
O2⋯H9B iv 2.59 (2)C6⋯C7iv 3.420 (3)
O2⋯H15A 2.72 (2)C8⋯C123.533 (3)
O2⋯H15B 2.56 (2)C10⋯H22.61 (2)
O2⋯H16B v 2.76 (2)C11⋯C13i 3.421 (3)
O3⋯H15A vi 2.84 (3)C11⋯H22.92 (2)
N1⋯N22.806 (3)C11⋯H13B i 2.88 (2)
N1⋯C12iv 3.365 (3)C14⋯H16C vi 2.95 (2)
N1⋯H12iv 2.431 (19)H2⋯H10B 2.17 (2)
N2⋯C6vii 3.389 (3)H3⋯H9A x 2.51 (2)
N2⋯H122.85 (2)H10B⋯H13B v 2.45 (3)
N3⋯H10A viii 2.73 (2)  

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) ; (viii) ; (ix) ; (x) .

Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H17N5O3
M r 327.34
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)7.2061 (15), 10.237 (2), 10.694 (2)
α, β, γ (°)95.356 (3), 92.867 (3), 100.291 (3)
V3)771.0 (3)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.10
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.24 × 0.13
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009)
T min, T max 0.97, 0.99
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections14566, 14566, 7794
R int 0.026
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.686
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.047, 0.151, 1.01
No. of reflections14566
No. of parameters286
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.90, −0.53

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012 ▸) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).

Figure 8

Hirshfeld surface representations with the function d norm plotted onto the surface for (a) H⋯H, (b) H⋯O/O⋯H, (c) H⋯N/N⋯H, (d) H⋯C/C⋯H, (e) C⋯C and (f) C⋯N/N⋯C inter­actions.

The Hirshfeld surface analysis confirms the importance of H-atom contacts in establishing the packing. The large number of H⋯H, H⋯O/O⋯H, H⋯ N/N⋯H and H⋯C/C⋯H inter­actions suggest that van der Waals inter­actions and hydrogen bonding play the major roles in the crystal packing (Hathwar et al., 2015 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

To a solution of 3-methyl-1-(prop-2-yn­yl)-3,4-di­hydro­quinox­alin-2(1H)-one (0.65 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) was added ethyl azido­acetate (1.04 mmol). The mixture was stirred under reflux for 24 h. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the solution was concentrated and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel by using as eluent a hexa­ne/ethyl acetate (9/1) mixture. Crystals were obtained when the solvent was allowed to evaporate. The solid product isolated was recrystallized from ethanol to afford yellow crystals in 75% yield.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. H atoms were located in a difference-Fourier map and were refined freely. Eleven reflections appearing near the top of the frames on which they were recorded were omitted from the final refinement as they appeared to have been partially obscured by the nozzle of the low-temperature attachment. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014561/xu5945sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014561/xu5945Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014561/xu5945Isup3.cdx Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014561/xu5945Isup4.cml CCDC reference: 1873385 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C16H17N5O3Z = 2
Mr = 327.34F(000) = 344
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.410 Mg m3
a = 7.2061 (15) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 10.237 (2) ÅCell parameters from 4358 reflections
c = 10.694 (2) Åθ = 2.7–29.1°
α = 95.356 (3)°µ = 0.10 mm1
β = 92.867 (3)°T = 100 K
γ = 100.291 (3)°Block, gold
V = 771.0 (3) Å30.25 × 0.24 × 0.13 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer14566 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube7794 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.2°, θmin = 1.9°
ω scansh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009)k = −14→13
Tmin = 0.97, Tmax = 0.99l = −14→14
14566 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.047Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.151All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0726P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
14566 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
286 parametersΔρmax = 0.90 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.53 e Å3
Experimental. The diffraction data were collected in three sets of 363 frames (0.5° width in ω) at φ = 0, 120 and 240°. A scan time of 40 sec/frame was used. Analysis of 226 reflections having I/σ(I) > 12 and chosen from the full data set with CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008) showed the crystal to belong to the triclinic system and to be twinned by a 176° rotation about the real axis 1,-0.8,-0.11. The raw data were processed using the multi-component version of SAINT under control of the two-component orientation file generated by CELL_NOW.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. Refined as a 2-component twin.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.21097 (18)0.29218 (12)0.26556 (12)0.0221 (3)
O20.72802 (18)0.89513 (13)0.19527 (13)0.0253 (3)
O30.99442 (17)0.86498 (12)0.10490 (12)0.0236 (3)
N10.2861 (2)0.44465 (14)0.58072 (14)0.0167 (3)
N20.1816 (2)0.50319 (14)0.33885 (14)0.0149 (3)
N30.2293 (2)0.62469 (15)0.02167 (14)0.0190 (4)
N40.3912 (2)0.67146 (15)−0.02467 (14)0.0195 (4)
N50.5294 (2)0.66253 (14)0.06255 (13)0.0163 (3)
C10.2076 (2)0.60425 (17)0.43915 (16)0.0149 (4)
C20.1859 (3)0.73515 (18)0.42255 (19)0.0197 (4)
H20.156 (3)0.760 (2)0.3418 (19)0.026 (6)*
C30.2093 (3)0.82977 (19)0.5254 (2)0.0232 (4)
H30.198 (3)0.919 (2)0.5132 (18)0.027 (5)*
C40.2543 (3)0.79803 (19)0.64554 (19)0.0221 (4)
H40.266 (3)0.864 (2)0.7164 (19)0.025 (5)*
C50.2805 (3)0.67017 (19)0.66222 (18)0.0193 (4)
H50.317 (3)0.6456 (19)0.7445 (18)0.021 (5)*
C60.2587 (2)0.57244 (17)0.55919 (17)0.0156 (4)
C70.2689 (2)0.35448 (17)0.48562 (17)0.0154 (4)
C80.2200 (2)0.37824 (17)0.35441 (17)0.0156 (4)
C90.2950 (3)0.21591 (19)0.5043 (2)0.0219 (4)
H9A0.175 (3)0.153 (2)0.472 (2)0.041 (6)*
H9B0.320 (3)0.207 (2)0.593 (2)0.038 (6)*
H9C0.401 (3)0.190 (2)0.455 (2)0.039 (6)*
C100.1103 (3)0.52580 (19)0.21316 (17)0.0177 (4)
H10A0.045 (3)0.439 (2)0.1700 (18)0.024 (5)*
H10B0.014 (3)0.5837 (18)0.2229 (17)0.018 (5)*
C110.2664 (2)0.58684 (16)0.13786 (16)0.0158 (4)
C120.4569 (3)0.61031 (17)0.16447 (17)0.0176 (4)
H120.531 (3)0.5937 (18)0.2336 (18)0.019 (5)*
C130.7253 (3)0.70767 (18)0.03953 (18)0.0179 (4)
H13A0.733 (3)0.7257 (19)−0.0493 (19)0.023 (5)*
H13B0.803 (2)0.6349 (19)0.0549 (17)0.017 (5)*
C140.8116 (3)0.83408 (17)0.12354 (17)0.0167 (4)
C151.0986 (3)0.98897 (18)0.1738 (2)0.0227 (4)
H15A1.045 (3)1.065 (2)0.1445 (18)0.023 (5)*
H15B1.075 (3)0.9888 (19)0.2649 (19)0.021 (5)*
C161.3022 (3)0.9965 (2)0.1468 (2)0.0294 (5)
H16A1.372 (3)1.081 (3)0.191 (2)0.050 (7)*
H16B1.354 (3)0.922 (2)0.1786 (19)0.035 (6)*
H16C1.322 (3)0.992 (2)0.053 (2)0.041 (7)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0273 (8)0.0180 (7)0.0193 (7)0.0028 (5)0.0020 (6)−0.0040 (5)
O20.0247 (7)0.0203 (7)0.0289 (8)0.0022 (6)0.0064 (6)−0.0064 (6)
O30.0190 (7)0.0187 (7)0.0296 (8)−0.0013 (5)0.0034 (6)−0.0070 (6)
N10.0147 (8)0.0181 (8)0.0175 (8)0.0030 (6)0.0013 (6)0.0029 (6)
N20.0155 (8)0.0154 (7)0.0133 (8)0.0015 (6)−0.0005 (6)0.0017 (6)
N30.0214 (9)0.0182 (8)0.0162 (8)0.0012 (6)−0.0011 (6)0.0017 (6)
N40.0222 (9)0.0193 (8)0.0157 (8)0.0009 (6)−0.0021 (6)0.0020 (6)
N50.0188 (8)0.0148 (7)0.0137 (8)0.0002 (6)−0.0009 (6)−0.0002 (6)
C10.0116 (9)0.0159 (9)0.0161 (9)0.0008 (7)0.0009 (7)−0.0006 (7)
C20.0179 (10)0.0178 (9)0.0235 (11)0.0032 (7)−0.0003 (8)0.0044 (8)
C30.0181 (10)0.0146 (9)0.0366 (12)0.0036 (7)0.0019 (8)−0.0006 (8)
C40.0173 (10)0.0194 (10)0.0267 (11)0.0008 (7)0.0031 (8)−0.0085 (8)
C50.0145 (9)0.0233 (10)0.0182 (10)0.0000 (7)0.0023 (8)−0.0016 (8)
C60.0121 (9)0.0161 (9)0.0179 (9)0.0013 (7)0.0015 (7)0.0005 (7)
C70.0119 (9)0.0153 (9)0.0190 (10)0.0017 (7)0.0028 (7)0.0029 (7)
C80.0134 (9)0.0148 (9)0.0179 (10)0.0004 (7)0.0022 (7)0.0013 (7)
C90.0231 (11)0.0178 (10)0.0255 (12)0.0045 (8)0.0026 (9)0.0045 (8)
C100.0168 (10)0.0203 (9)0.0151 (9)0.0020 (7)−0.0035 (7)0.0016 (7)
C110.0213 (10)0.0124 (8)0.0127 (9)0.0027 (7)−0.0017 (7)−0.0009 (7)
C120.0221 (10)0.0158 (9)0.0142 (9)0.0026 (7)−0.0013 (8)0.0014 (7)
C130.0192 (10)0.0170 (9)0.0163 (10)0.0011 (7)0.0017 (8)−0.0004 (7)
C140.0201 (10)0.0137 (8)0.0164 (9)0.0028 (7)0.0007 (7)0.0025 (7)
C150.0231 (11)0.0156 (9)0.0262 (12)−0.0012 (8)−0.0010 (9)−0.0046 (8)
C160.0220 (11)0.0218 (11)0.0419 (14)0.0008 (8)−0.0017 (10)−0.0017 (10)
O1—C81.225 (2)C5—C61.400 (2)
O2—C141.197 (2)C5—H50.974 (19)
O3—C141.328 (2)C7—C81.482 (2)
O3—C151.466 (2)C7—C91.494 (2)
N1—C71.293 (2)C9—H9A1.00 (2)
N1—C61.396 (2)C9—H9B0.97 (2)
N2—C81.379 (2)C9—H9C1.00 (2)
N2—C11.400 (2)C10—C111.496 (2)
N2—C101.468 (2)C10—H10A0.99 (2)
N3—N41.318 (2)C10—H10B0.992 (18)
N3—C111.363 (2)C11—C121.362 (3)
N4—N51.3511 (19)C12—H120.935 (18)
N5—C121.346 (2)C13—C141.519 (2)
N5—C131.446 (2)C13—H13A0.99 (2)
C1—C61.401 (3)C13—H13B1.027 (18)
C1—C21.403 (2)C15—C161.500 (3)
C2—C31.378 (3)C15—H15A0.997 (19)
C2—H20.95 (2)C15—H15B0.996 (19)
C3—C41.391 (3)C16—H16A0.99 (3)
C3—H30.95 (2)C16—H16B0.99 (2)
C4—C51.382 (3)C16—H16C1.02 (2)
C4—H40.96 (2)
O1···C113.394 (3)N3···H13Bi2.672 (19)
O1···C13i3.318 (3)N4···C5ix3.401 (3)
O1···C15ii3.116 (3)N4···H5ix2.48 (2)
O1···C16ii3.360 (3)C1···C6vii3.521 (3)
O1···H9A2.74 (3)C1···C123.519 (3)
O1···H10A2.35 (2)C2···C7vii3.459 (3)
O1···H13Ai2.36 (2)C2···C113.397 (3)
O1···H15Aii2.61 (2)C2···H10B2.63 (2)
O1···H16Aii2.71 (2)C3···C9vii3.574 (3)
O2···N52.772 (2)C3···H9Avii2.81 (2)
O2···C4iii3.409 (3)C4···C8vii3.569 (3)
O2···C123.186 (2)C5···C8vii3.545 (3)
O2···H4iii2.55 (2)C5···C10vii3.548 (3)
O2···H9Biv2.59 (2)C6···C7iv3.420 (3)
O2···H15A2.72 (2)C8···C123.533 (3)
O2···H15B2.56 (2)C10···H22.61 (2)
O2···H16Bv2.76 (2)C11···C13i3.421 (3)
O3···H15Avi2.84 (3)C11···H22.92 (2)
N1···N22.806 (3)C11···H13Bi2.88 (2)
N1···C12iv3.365 (3)C14···H16Cvi2.95 (2)
N1···H12iv2.431 (19)H2···H10B2.17 (2)
N2···C6vii3.389 (3)H3···H9Ax2.51 (2)
N2···H122.85 (2)H10B···H13Bv2.45 (3)
N3···H10Aviii2.73 (2)
C14—O3—C15116.32 (14)C7—C9—H9B111.1 (13)
C7—N1—C6118.44 (15)H9C—C9—H9B109.7 (17)
C8—N2—C1121.42 (15)H9A—C9—H9B108.8 (17)
C8—N2—C10117.40 (15)N2—C10—C11111.65 (14)
C1—N2—C10121.18 (14)N2—C10—H10A107.9 (11)
N4—N3—C11108.51 (14)C11—C10—H10A110.2 (11)
N3—N4—N5106.77 (14)N2—C10—H10B108.6 (10)
C12—N5—N4111.21 (15)C11—C10—H10B110.9 (10)
C12—N5—C13128.71 (16)H10A—C10—H10B107.5 (15)
N4—N5—C13120.08 (14)C12—C11—N3109.00 (16)
N2—C1—C6118.25 (15)C12—C11—C10129.83 (16)
N2—C1—C2122.11 (16)N3—C11—C10121.13 (16)
C6—C1—C2119.63 (16)N5—C12—C11104.50 (16)
C3—C2—C1119.48 (18)N5—C12—H12123.8 (11)
C3—C2—H2119.1 (12)C11—C12—H12131.7 (11)
C1—C2—H2121.4 (12)N5—C13—C14111.72 (15)
C2—C3—C4121.25 (18)N5—C13—H13A108.9 (11)
C2—C3—H3119.0 (12)C14—C13—H13A108.9 (11)
C4—C3—H3119.7 (12)N5—C13—H13B110.3 (10)
C5—C4—C3119.61 (18)C14—C13—H13B108.8 (10)
C5—C4—H4120.3 (12)H13A—C13—H13B108.1 (15)
C3—C4—H4120.1 (12)O2—C14—O3125.75 (16)
C4—C5—C6120.24 (18)O2—C14—C13125.31 (17)
C4—C5—H5121.7 (11)O3—C14—C13108.93 (15)
C6—C5—H5118.0 (11)O3—C15—C16106.61 (16)
N1—C6—C5118.17 (16)O3—C15—H15A108.2 (11)
N1—C6—C1122.09 (16)C16—C15—H15A112.8 (11)
C5—C6—C1119.73 (17)O3—C15—H15B109.3 (11)
N1—C7—C8123.89 (16)C16—C15—H15B113.9 (11)
N1—C7—C9120.33 (16)H15A—C15—H15B106.0 (15)
C8—C7—C9115.77 (16)C15—C16—H16A106.9 (14)
O1—C8—N2121.94 (16)C15—C16—H16B111.6 (12)
O1—C8—C7122.44 (16)H16A—C16—H16B108.6 (19)
N2—C8—C7115.60 (15)C15—C16—H16C112.4 (13)
C7—C9—H9C111.2 (13)H16A—C16—H16C110.6 (19)
C7—C9—H9A108.0 (13)H16B—C16—H16C106.7 (18)
H9C—C9—H9A107.9 (18)
C11—N3—N4—N50.12 (18)C1—N2—C8—C76.6 (2)
N3—N4—N5—C120.01 (19)C10—N2—C8—C7−172.74 (14)
N3—N4—N5—C13−179.45 (14)N1—C7—C8—O1177.45 (16)
C8—N2—C1—C6−5.3 (2)C9—C7—C8—O1−3.6 (2)
C10—N2—C1—C6174.01 (15)N1—C7—C8—N2−3.7 (3)
C8—N2—C1—C2174.05 (16)C9—C7—C8—N2175.18 (15)
C10—N2—C1—C2−6.7 (2)C8—N2—C10—C11−95.05 (18)
N2—C1—C2—C3178.61 (16)C1—N2—C10—C1185.64 (19)
C6—C1—C2—C3−2.1 (3)N4—N3—C11—C12−0.20 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (3)N4—N3—C11—C10−178.25 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C51.5 (3)N2—C10—C11—C127.1 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6−1.1 (3)N2—C10—C11—N3−175.33 (15)
C7—N1—C6—C5−179.00 (16)N4—N5—C12—C11−0.13 (19)
C7—N1—C6—C12.1 (2)C13—N5—C12—C11179.27 (16)
C4—C5—C6—N1−179.82 (16)N3—C11—C12—N50.20 (19)
C4—C5—C6—C1−0.9 (3)C10—C11—C12—N5178.02 (17)
N2—C1—C6—N10.7 (3)C12—N5—C13—C14−69.5 (2)
C2—C1—C6—N1−178.63 (15)N4—N5—C13—C14109.82 (17)
N2—C1—C6—C5−178.19 (15)C15—O3—C14—O2−3.5 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C52.5 (3)C15—O3—C14—C13176.85 (15)
C6—N1—C7—C8−0.5 (3)N5—C13—C14—O2−4.2 (3)
C6—N1—C7—C9−179.40 (15)N5—C13—C14—O3175.41 (14)
C1—N2—C8—O1−174.62 (15)C14—O3—C15—C16175.25 (16)
C10—N2—C8—O16.1 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5···N4xi0.974 (19)2.48 (2)3.401 (3)157.9 (15)
C9—H9B···O2iv0.97 (2)2.59 (2)3.508 (3)156.9 (18)
C12—H12···N1iv0.935 (18)2.431 (19)3.365 (2)177.6 (16)
C13—H13A···O1i0.99 (2)2.36 (2)3.318 (2)162.5 (16)
C13—H13B···N3i1.027 (18)2.672 (19)3.481 (2)135.6 (13)
C9—H9C···Cg3iv1.00 (2)2.67 (2)3.430 (2)132.0 (15)
  13 in total

1.  Synthesis of certain substituted quinoxalines as antimicrobial agents (Part II).

Authors:  Mohga M Badran; Khaled A M Abouzid; M H M Hussein
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.946

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Quinoxaline chemistry. Part 7. 2-[aminobenzoates]- and 2-[aminobenzoylglutamate]-quinoxalines as classical antifolate agents. Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro anticancer, anti-HIV and antifungal activity.

Authors:  M Loriga; S Piras; P Sanna; G Paglietti
Journal:  Farmaco       Date:  1997-03

4.  Synthesis of variously substituted 3-phenoxymethyl quinoxalin-2-ones and quinoxalines capable to potentiate in vitro the antiproliferative activity of anticancer drugs in multi-drug resistant cell lines.

Authors:  Antonio Carta; Mario Loriga; Sandra Piras; Giuseppe Paglietti; Paolo La Colla; Bernardetta Busonera; Gabriella Collu; Roberta Loddo
Journal:  Med Chem       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  N'-(3-Methyl-quinoxalin-2-yl)-N'-phenyl-benzohydrazide.

Authors:  Youssef Ramli; Ahmed Moussaif; Hafid Zouihri; Houda Bourichi; El Mokhtar Essassi
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Ethyl 2-{5-[(3-oxo-3,4-di-hydro-2H-1,4-benzo-thia-zin-4-yl)meth-yl]-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl}acetate.

Authors:  Nada Kheira Sebbar; Abdelfettah Zerzouf; El Mokhtar Essassi; Mohamed Saadi; Lahcen El Ammari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-01-08

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  N'-Phenyl-N'-[3-(2,4,5-triphenyl-2,5-di-hydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)quinoxalin-2-yl]benzohydrazide.

Authors:  Youssef Ramli; Khalid Karrouchi; El Mokhtar Essassi; Lahcen El Ammari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-07-27

10.  Quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions in orthorhombic rubrene.

Authors:  Venkatesha R Hathwar; Mattia Sist; Mads R V Jørgensen; Aref H Mamakhel; Xiaoping Wang; Christina M Hoffmann; Kunihisa Sugimoto; Jacob Overgaard; Bo Brummerstedt Iversen
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.