Literature DB >> 30442776

Comment on "Predicting reaction performance in C-N cross-coupling using machine learning".

Kangway V Chuang1, Michael J Keiser2.   

Abstract

Ahneman et al (Reports, 13 April 2018) applied machine learning models to predict C-N cross-coupling reaction yields. The models use atomic, electronic, and vibrational descriptors as input features. However, the experimental design is insufficient to distinguish models trained on chemical features from those trained solely on random-valued features in retrospective and prospective test scenarios, thus failing classical controls in machine learning.
Copyright © 2018, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30442776     DOI: 10.1126/science.aat8603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  16 in total

Review 1.  Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Kevin Maik Jablonka; Daniele Ongari; Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Berend Smit
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Unified Deep Learning Model for Multitask Reaction Predictions with Explanation.

Authors:  Jieyu Lu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Mechanisms, Challenges, and Opportunities of Dual Ni/Photoredox-Catalyzed C(sp2)-C(sp3) Cross-Couplings.

Authors:  Mingbin Yuan; Osvaldo Gutierrez
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2021-09-21

4.  Transition State Force Field for the Asymmetric Redox-Relay Heck Reaction.

Authors:  Anthony R Rosales; Sean P Ross; Paul Helquist; Per-Ola Norrby; Matthew S Sigman; Olaf Wiest
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  What Does the Machine Learn? Knowledge Representations of Chemical Reactivity.

Authors:  Joshua A Kammeraad; Jack Goetz; Eric A Walker; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Iterative Supervised Principal Component Analysis Driven Ligand Design for Regioselective Ti-Catalyzed Pyrrole Synthesis.

Authors:  Xin Yi See; Xuelan Wen; T Alexander Wheeler; Channing K Klein; Jason D Goodpaster; Benjamin R Reiner; Ian A Tonks
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 13.084

Review 7.  Deep Learning for Deep Chemistry: Optimizing the Prediction of Chemical Patterns.

Authors:  Tânia F G G Cova; Alberto A C C Pais
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems.

Authors:  John A Keith; Valentin Vassilev-Galindo; Bingqing Cheng; Stefan Chmiela; Michael Gastegger; Klaus-Robert Müller; Alexandre Tkatchenko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Predicting glycosylation stereoselectivity using machine learning.

Authors:  Sooyeon Moon; Sourav Chatterjee; Peter H Seeberger; Kerry Gilmore
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Machine learning framework for assessment of microbial factory performance.

Authors:  Tolutola Oyetunde; Di Liu; Hector Garcia Martin; Yinjie J Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.