Literature DB >> 30442757

Prospective, Multisite, International Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT, Multiparametric MRI, and 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-11 PET/CT in Men with High-Risk Features and Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Performance and Patient Outcomes.

Louise Emmett1, Ur Metser2, Glenn Bauman3, Rodney J Hicks4, Andrew Weickhardt5, Ian D Davis6, Shonit Punwani7, Greg Pond8, Sue Chua9, Bao Ho1, Edward Johnston7, Frederic Pouliot10, Andrew M Scott5.   

Abstract

A significant proportion of men with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy (RP) fail prostate fossa (PF) salvage radiation treatment (SRT). This study was done to assess the ability of 18F-fluoromethylcholine (18F-FCH) PET/CT (hereafter referred to as 18F-FCH), 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-11 PET/CT (hereafter referred to as PSMA), and pelvic multiparametric MRI (hereafter referred to as pelvic MRI) to identify men who will best benefit from SRT.
Methods: Prospective, multisite imaging studies were carried out in men who had rising PSA levels after RP, high-risk features, and negative/equivocal conventional imaging results and who were being considered for SRT. 18F-FCH (91/91), pelvic MRI (88/91), and PSMA (31/91) (Australia) were all performed within 2 wk. Imaging was interpreted by experienced local/central interpreters who were masked with regard to other imaging results, with consensus being reached for discordant interpretations. Expected management was documented before and after imaging, and data about all treatments and PSA levels were collected for 3 y. The treatment response to SRT was defined as a reduction in PSA levels of >50% without androgen deprivation therapy.
Results: The median Gleason score, PSA level at imaging, and PSA doubling time were 8, 0.42 (interquartile range, 0.29-0.93) ng/mL, and 5.0 (interquartile range, 3.3-7.6) months. Recurrent prostate cancer was detected in 28% (25/88) by pelvic MRI, 32% (29/91) by 18F-FCH, and 42% (13/31) by PSMA. This recurrence was found within the PF in 21.5% (19/88), 13% (12/91), and 19% (6/31) and at sites outside the PF (extra-PF) in 8% (7/88), 19% (17/91), and 32% (10/31) by MRI, 18F-FCH, and PSMA, respectively (P < 0.004). A total of 94% (16/17) of extra-PF sites on 18F-FCH were within the pelvic MRI field. Intrapelvic extra-PF disease was detected in 90% (9/10) by PSMA and in 31% (5/16) by MRI. 18F-FCH changed management in 46% (42/91), and MRI changed management in 24% (21/88). PSMA provided additional management changes over 18F-FCH in 23% (7/31). The treatment response to SRT was higher in men with negative results or disease confined to the PF than in men with extra-PF disease (18F-FCH 73% [32/44] versus 33% [3/9] [P < 0.02], pelvic MRI 70% [32/46] versus 50% [2/4] [P was not significant], and PSMA 88% [7/8] versus 14% [1/7] [P < 0.005]). Men with negative imaging results (MRI, 18F-FCH, or PSMA) had high (78%) SRT response rates.
Conclusion: 18F-FCH and PSMA had high detection rates for extra-PF disease in men with negative/equivocal conventional imaging results and rising PSA levels after RP. These findings affected management and treatment responses, suggesting an important role for PET in triaging men being considered for curative SRT.
© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluoromethylcholine; PET; PSMA; biochemical recurrence; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30442757      PMCID: PMC6581227          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  22 in total

1.  Perspectives on the natural history of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, based on the response to salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Kevin M Slawin; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Results of Dose-adapted Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy Based on an Endorectal MRI Target Definition Model.

Authors:  Thomas Zilli; Sandra Jorcano; Nicolas Peguret; Francesca Caparrotti; Alberto Hidalgo; Haleem G Khan; Hansjörg Vees; Raymond Miralbell
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Using Endorectal Coil MRI at 3 T: Addition of DWI and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement to T2-Weighted MRI.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Robert P Hartman; Adam T Froemming; Clinton E Hagen; Naoki Takahashi; Akira Kawashima
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Relationship between prostate-specific antigen kinetics and detection rate of radiolabelled choline PET/CT in restaging prostate cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Treglia; Luca Ceriani; Ramin Sadeghi; Giampiero Giovacchini; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  (68) Ga-PSMA has a high detection rate of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa in patients being considered for salvage radiation treatment.

Authors:  Pim J van Leeuwen; Phillip Stricker; George Hruby; Andrew Kneebone; Francis Ting; Ben Thompson; Quoc Nguyen; Bao Ho; Louise Emmett
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Joshua J Morigi; Phillip D Stricker; Pim J van Leeuwen; Reuben Tang; Bao Ho; Quoc Nguyen; George Hruby; Gerald Fogarty; Raj Jagavkar; Andrew Kneebone; Adam Hickey; Stefano Fanti; Lisa Tarlinton; Louise Emmett
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Aradhana Kaushal; Sandeep Sankineni; Elena Lita; Anthony N Hoang; Arvin K George; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Jochen Kruecker; Pingkun Yan; Sheng Xu; Jean J de la Rosette; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael J Zelefsky; Michael W Kattan; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh; Eric A Klein; Patrick A Kupelian; Claus G Roehrborn; David A Pistenmaa; Heather D Pacholke; Stanley L Liauw; Matthew S Katz; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino; Kevin M Slawin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Christian M Zechmann; Anna Malcher; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Heinz G Linhart; Tim Holland-Letz; Boris A Hadaschik; Frederik L Giesel; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  [Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based diagnostics and treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Afshar-Oromieh; I Alberts; C Sachpekidis; A Rominger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis.

Authors:  Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Bernd Vollnberg; Ian Alberts; Alexandrine Bähler; Christos Sachpekidis; Lotte Dijkstra; Fabian Haupt; Silvan Boxler; Tobias Gross; Tim Holland-Letz; George Thalmann; Johannes Heverhagen; Axel Rominger; Kirsi Härmä; Martin H Maurer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PET-CT for the diagnosis and treatment of primary musculoskeletal tumors in Chinese patients - experience from 255 patients in a single center.

Authors:  Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Tianlin Wen; Xiaohui Niu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Seek and Find: Current Prospective Evidence for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Niamh M Keegan; Lisa Bodei; Michael J Morris
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2021-03-18

5.  Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian Leigh Alberts; Svenja Elizabeth Seide; Clemens Mingels; Karl Peter Bohn; Kuangyu Shi; Helle D Zacho; Axel Rominger; Ali Afshar-Oromieh
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Survey by the French Medicine Agency (ANSM) of the imaging protocol, detection rate, and safety of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in case of negative or equivocal 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT: 1084 examinations.

Authors:  Yanna-Marina Chevalme; Lotfi Boudali; Mathieu Gauthé; Caroline Rousseau; Andrea Skanjeti; Charles Merlin; Philippe Robin; Anne-Laure Giraudet; Marc Janier; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 8.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rang Wang; Guohua Shen; Mingxing Huang; Rong Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Adaptive sequential plan-on-plan optimization during prostate-specific antigen response guided radiotherapy of recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vilberg Jóhannesson; Elinore Wieslander; Per Nilsson; Eva Brun; Ulrika Bitzén; Göran Ahlgren; Tomas Olsson; Sven Bäck; Elisabeth Kjellén; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.