| Literature DB >> 30441776 |
Umi Zulaikha Mohd Azmi1, Nor Azah Yusof2,3, Norzila Kusnin4, Jaafar Abdullah5,6, Siti Suraiya7, Poh Shing Ong8, Nurul Hanun Ahmad Raston9, Siti Fatimah Abd Rahman10, Mohamad Faris Mohamad Fathil11.
Abstract
A rapid and sensitive sandwich electrochemical immunosensor was developed based on the fabrication of the graphene/polyaniline (GP/PANI) nanocomposite onto screen-printed gold electrode (SPGE) for detection of tuberculosis biomarker 10-kDa culture filtrate protein (CFP10). The prepared GP/PANI nanocomposite was characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The chemical bonding and morphology of GP/PANI-modified SPGE were studied by Raman spectroscopy and FESEM coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, respectively. From both studies, it clearly showed that GP/PANI was successfully coated onto SPGE through drop cast technique. Cyclic voltammetry was used to study the electrochemical properties of the modified electrode. The effective surface area for GP/PANI-modified SPGE was enhanced about five times compared with bare SPGE. Differential pulse voltammetry was used to detect the CFP10 antigen. The GP/PANI-modified SPGE that was fortified with sandwich type immunosensor exhibited a wide linear range (20⁻100 ng/mL) with a low detection limit of 15 ng/mL. This proposed electrochemical immunosensor is sensitive, low sample volume, rapid and disposable, which is suitable for tuberculosis detection in real samples.Entities:
Keywords: electrochemical sensor; graphene; polyaniline; screen-printed gold electrode (SPGE); tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30441776 PMCID: PMC6263639 DOI: 10.3390/s18113926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the fabrication process of GP/PANI-modified SPGE in sandwich immunoassay format.
Figure 2FESEM images of (a) graphene and (b) GP/PANI nanocomposite with magnification of 50k. (c) IR spectra of GP nanosheet and GP/PANI nanocomposite.
Figure 3FESEM images coupled with EDX spectra of (a) bare SPGE and (b) GP/PANI-modified SPGE. (c) Raman spectra of GP-modified SPGE and GP/PANI-modified SPGE.
Figure 4(a) Histogram of different amount of GP/PANI (µL) on SPGE. (b) The relationship of oxidation peak current and square root of scan rates for bare SPGE and GP/PANI-modified SPGE.
Figure 5DPV responses of (a) bare SGPE; (b) SPGE/GP/PANI; (c) SPGE/GP/PANI/CapAb; (d) SPGE/GP/PANI/CapAb/CFP10/Ab-Fe@Au; (e) SPGE/GP/PANI/CapAb/BSA/Ab-Fe@Au and (f) SPGE/Fe@Au in 0.01 M PBS solution (pH 7.4).
Figure 6(a) Sensitivity study for the detection of CFP10 at concentrations in the range of 20–100 ng/mL. Inset image shows the DPV responses of the sensor towards the different concentrations of CFP10. (b) Calibration curve of the relative change in current with estimated LOD.
Linearity range and LOD of CFP10 antigen using different immunoassay method.
| No. | Detection Method | Linear Range | LOD | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) | Not reported | 0.35 IU/mL | [ |
| 2. | Plasmonic ELISA | 0–0.1 µg/mL | 0.01 µg/mL | [ |
| 3. | Magnetophoretic immunoassay | 1 pM–1 mM | 0.3 pM | [ |
| 4. | Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) | 0.1 to 1 μg/mL | 100 ng/mL | [ |
| 5. | Electrochemical | 20–100 ng/mL | 15 ng/mL | This work |
Figure 7DPV response of sandwich electrochemical immunosensor for CFP10 detection using GP/PANI-modified SPGE in real sample application.
Reproducibility of 60 ng/mL of CFP10 antigen.
| Replicate | Peak Current (µA) | Mean, µ | Standard Deviation, σ | Relative Standard Deviation, RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.09 | 6.13 | 0.034 | 0.55 |
| 2 | 6.16 | |||
| 3 | 6.16 | |||
| 4 | 6.14 | |||
| 5 | 6.10 |