Literature DB >> 30441046

Effect of Aging on Cortical Current Flow Due to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Considerations for Safety.

Chris Thomas, Abhishek Datta, Adam Woods.   

Abstract

While intracranial volume is thought to be fixed throughout the lifespan, there is little doubt that the brain shrinks with age and it is most precipitous after about the age of 50. This as a consequence reflects an increase in cranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with age. Of the myriad factors influencing brain current flow, these changes in CSF volume are expected to play a profound role given its high electrical conductivity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of agerelated morphological changes on brain current flow patterns due to transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Anatomical MRI data were collected for 5 healthy subjects spanning 5 decades of life (ages: 43 to 85). Finite element models derived from the MRI were used to calculate cortical electrical field values during tDCS. The widely used C3-Fp2 (M1-SO) and the F3-F4 montage along with two High Definition-tDCS electrode montages 4X1 (C3-centered) and 4X1 (F3-centered) were simulated. Peak induced electrical field at the intended brain target (assumed to be directly underneath the electrode) and at non-intended brain regions was compared with the individual brain atrophy coefficients. Findings across 4 subjects (ages: 43 to 75) indicate reduced peak electrical field with increasing age. However, this trend reverses for the oldest subject. While age-related morphological changes lead to significant changes in current flow distribution, they are not substantially different than younger adults. The predictions of this study are the first step to assess safety of tDCS in elderly subjects and provide a rational path in customizing stimulation dose for trials involving them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30441046     DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 2375-7477


  10 in total

Review 1.  Managing Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in the Elderly: Intrathecal Therapy.

Authors:  Barbara Kleinmann; Tilman Wolter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use.

Authors:  Giuseppina Pilloni; Leigh E Charvet; Marom Bikson; Nikhil Palekar; Min-Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Alicia M Goodwill; Beth Ann O'Brien; Brenda Rapp; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.184

4.  Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Alejandro Albizu; Andrew O'Shea; Megan A Forbes; Nicole R Nissim; Jessica N Kraft; Nicole D Evangelista; Hanna K Hausman; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  i-SATA: A MATLAB based toolbox to estimate current density generated by transcranial direct current stimulation in an individual brain.

Authors:  Rajan Kashyap; Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Ramaswamy Arumugam; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; Sh Annabel Chen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Remediate Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Cheshire Hardcastle; Alejandro Albizu; Stacey Alvarez-Alvarado; Emanuel M Boutzoukas; Nicole D Evangelista; Hanna K Hausman; Jessica Kraft; Kailey Langer; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over S1 Differentially Modulates Proprioceptive Accuracy in Young and Old Adults.

Authors:  Toni Muffel; Franziska Kirsch; Pei-Cheng Shih; Benjamin Kalloch; Sara Schaumberg; Arno Villringer; Bernhard Sehm
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Júlia Schirmer Saldanha; Maxciel Zortea; Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Age-Related EEG Power Reductions Cannot Be Explained by Changes of the Conductivity Distribution in the Head Due to Brain Atrophy.

Authors:  Mingjian He; Feng Liu; Aapo Nummenmaa; Matti Hämäläinen; Bradford C Dickerson; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response.

Authors:  Alejandro Albizu; Ruogu Fang; Aprinda Indahlastari; Andrew O'Shea; Skylar E Stolte; Kyle B See; Emanuel M Boutzoukas; Jessica N Kraft; Nicole R Nissim; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 8.955

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.