Literature DB >> 3044036

CT diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma: the importance of detecting small amounts of fat.

M A Bosniak1, A J Megibow, D H Hulnick, S Horii, B N Raghavendra.   

Abstract

Six patients were reviewed who had renal angiomyolipoma (1.2-4.0 cm) in which only minimal amounts of fat were evident on CT. The fat content of the lesion was appreciated because tissue attenuation measurements of small areas of low attenuation within the tumors were performed and because thin-section (5-mm) and nonenhanced CT scans were used. The fat content of the lesions could be identified on 10-mm sections in three cases but only on 5-mm sections in three others. In two cases, fat was seen only on the nonenhanced 5-mm thin sections. Careful sampling of low-density regions within the mass must be performed because a single region of interest over the entire tumor will produce an average attenuation in the soft-tissue range. The use of 5-mm thin sections and thin, nonenhanced CT sections increases spatial and density resolution and decreases susceptibility to partial-volume effects. In a correlative study, no areas of fat were detected in a review of 100 well-circumscribed (4.0 cm or smaller) renal cell carcinomas. Detecting the existence of fat in a renal lesion will establish the diagnosis of angiomyolipoma and is the only radiologic finding that can differentiate it from renal cell carcinoma. Thus, unnecessary surgery will be avoided in these cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3044036     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.3.497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  39 in total

1.  Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: a clinical enigma in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  C D George; M Darby; E J Adam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Imaging features of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: diagnostic pitfalls.

Authors:  Nilo A Avila; Andrew J Dwyer; Joel Moss
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Aggressive renal angiomyolipoma extending into the renal vein and inferior vena cava - an uncommon entity.

Authors:  S S Bakshi; K Vishal; V Kalia; J S Gill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  MR classification of renal masses with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Ivan Pedrosa; Mary T Chou; Long Ngo; Ronaldo H Baroni; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Galaburda; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Spontaneous perirenal hemorrhage: what radiologists need to know.

Authors:  Jesus R Diaz; Demetrios J Agriantonis; Jorge Aguila; Jesus E Calleros; Anoop P Ayyappan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-02-23

Review 6.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours.

Authors:  F Cornelis; E Tricaud; A S Lasserre; F Petitpierre; J C Bernhard; Y Le Bras; M Yacoub; M Bouzgarrou; A Ravaud; N Grenier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Epithelioid angiomyolipoma: imaging appearances.

Authors:  N Bharwani; T J Christmas; C Jameson; N Moat; S A Sohaib
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Biopsy of renal masses: when and why.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Imaging and management of the incidentally discovered renal mass.

Authors:  Jonathon Willatt; Isaac R Francis
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.