Adeline Le Cabec1,2, Nancy K Tang3, Valentin Ruano Rubio4, Simon Hillson5. 1. Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. 2. ID19 Beamline, Structure of Materials Group, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. 3. Unaffiliated. 4. Data Science Data Engineering, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 5. Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Adult age at death estimation continues to challenge physical anthropologists. One estimation method involves counting tooth cementum annulations (TCA). Non-destructively accessing TCA is a critical step to approaching fossil teeth of unknown age and to verifying life history profiles of human ancestors. This pilot study aims to (a) non-destructively image TCA in teeth from a known age archeological human population by propagation phase contrast X-ray synchrotron μCT (PPC-SR-μCT) (b) test the correlation between real and estimated ages, and the accuracy, precision and bias of age estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examine 20 permanent human canines (aged 20-81 years), from a 18th to 19th century known age collection from St. Luke's Church (London, England). We scanned transverse segments of acellular cementum in the apical portion of the middle root third using PPC-SR-μCT. We generated virtual transverse sections on which two observers perform two sessions of blind TCA counts. We calculate the estimated ages at death by adding 10 years to the TCA counts. RESULTS: A moderately strong positive linear relationship exists between real and estimated ages (r = 0.76, p < .001), with an average inaccuracy of 16.1 years and an average bias towards underestimation of 15.7 years. This difference is lower in individuals <50 years (6.8 and 6.5 years, respectively, n = 10) compared with those >50 years (24.9 years, n = 10). DISCUSSION: We reliably imaged and identified TCA in individuals <50 years from a known-age archeological sample. Scanning refinement will yield a promising alternative to current destructive methods of TCA analyses and to aid access to life history events in adult fossil hominins.
OBJECTIVES: Adult age at death estimation continues to challenge physical anthropologists. One estimation method involves counting tooth cementum annulations (TCA). Non-destructively accessing TCA is a critical step to approaching fossil teeth of unknown age and to verifying life history profiles of human ancestors. This pilot study aims to (a) non-destructively image TCA in teeth from a known age archeological human population by propagation phase contrast X-ray synchrotron μCT (PPC-SR-μCT) (b) test the correlation between real and estimated ages, and the accuracy, precision and bias of age estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examine 20 permanent humancanines (aged 20-81 years), from a 18th to 19th century known age collection from St. Luke's Church (London, England). We scanned transverse segments of acellular cementum in the apical portion of the middle root third using PPC-SR-μCT. We generated virtual transverse sections on which two observers perform two sessions of blind TCA counts. We calculate the estimated ages at death by adding 10 years to the TCA counts. RESULTS: A moderately strong positive linear relationship exists between real and estimated ages (r = 0.76, p < .001), with an average inaccuracy of 16.1 years and an average bias towards underestimation of 15.7 years. This difference is lower in individuals <50 years (6.8 and 6.5 years, respectively, n = 10) compared with those >50 years (24.9 years, n = 10). DISCUSSION: We reliably imaged and identified TCA in individuals <50 years from a known-age archeological sample. Scanning refinement will yield a promising alternative to current destructive methods of TCA analyses and to aid access to life history events in adult fossil hominins.
Authors: Elis Newham; Ian J Corfe; Kate Robson Brown; Neil J Gostling; Pamela G Gill; Philipp Schneider Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Robert C Power; Amanda G Henry; Julian Moosmann; Felix Beckmann; Heiko Temming; Anthony Roberts; Adeline Le Cabec Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2022-03-16
Authors: Alexandra Migga; Georg Schulz; Griffin Rodgers; Melissa Osterwalder; Christine Tanner; Holger Blank; Iwan Jerjen; Phil Salmon; William Twengström; Mario Scheel; Timm Weitkamp; Christian M Schlepütz; Jan S Bolten; Jörg Huwyler; Gerhard Hotz; Srinivas Madduri; Bert Müller Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2022-03-31
Authors: Elis Newham; Pamela G Gill; Philippa Brewer; Michael J Benton; Vincent Fernandez; Neil J Gostling; David Haberthür; Jukka Jernvall; Tuomas Kankaanpää; Aki Kallonen; Charles Navarro; Alexandra Pacureanu; Kelly Richards; Kate Robson Brown; Philipp Schneider; Heikki Suhonen; Paul Tafforeau; Katherine A Williams; Berit Zeller-Plumhoff; Ian J Corfe Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Elis Newham; Pamela G Gill; Kate Robson Brown; Neil J Gostling; Ian J Corfe; Philipp Schneider Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura Lleras-Forero; Elis Newham; Stefan Teufel; Koichi Kawakami; Christine Hartmann; Chrissy L Hammond; Robert D Knight; Stefan Schulte-Merker Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 5.682