Literature DB >> 30430711

Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample.

Nathaniel E Anderson1, Keith A Harenski1, Carla L Harenski1, Michael R Koenigs2, Jean Decety3, Vince D Calhoun1,4, Kent A Kiehl1,4.   

Abstract

Differences between males and females have been extensively documented in biological, psychological, and behavioral domains. Among these, sex differences in the rate and typology of antisocial behavior remains one of the most conspicuous and enduring patterns among humans. However, the nature and extent of sexual dimorphism in the brain among antisocial populations remains mostly unexplored. Here, we seek to understand sex differences in brain structure between incarcerated males and females in a large sample (n = 1,300) using machine learning. We apply source-based morphometry, a contemporary multivariate approach for quantifying gray matter measured with magnetic resonance imaging, and carry these parcellations forward using machine learning to classify sex. Models using components of brain gray matter volume and concentration were able to differentiate between males and females with greater than 93% generalizable accuracy. Highly differentiated components include orbitofrontal and frontopolar regions, proportionally larger in females, and anterior medial temporal regions proportionally larger in males. We also provide a complimentary analysis of a nonforensic healthy control sample and replicate our 93% sex discrimination. These findings demonstrate that the brains of males and females are highly distinguishable. Understanding sex differences in the brain has implications for elucidating variability in the incidence and progression of disease, psychopathology, and differences in psychological traits and behavior. The reliability of these differences confirms the importance of sex as a moderator of individual differences in brain structure and suggests future research should consider sex specific models.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; antisocial behavior; gender; machine learning; sex; source-based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30430711      PMCID: PMC6397072          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  52 in total

1.  Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments.

Authors:  Jorge Moll; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Ivanei E Bramati; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Nopoulos; M Flaum; D O'Leary; N C Andreasen
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2000-02-28       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 3.  Unmixing fMRI with independent component analysis.

Authors:  Vince D Calhoun; Tülay Adali
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

4.  Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain.

Authors:  Madhura Ingalhalikar; Alex Smith; Drew Parker; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Ragini Verma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Anderson; Keith A Harenski; Carla L Harenski; Michael R Koenigs; Jean Decety; Vince D Calhoun; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression.

Authors:  John Archer; Sarah M Coyne
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2005

7.  Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray-white composition of the human cerebrum.

Authors:  John S Allen; Hanna Damasio; Thomas J Grabowski; Joel Bruss; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Source-based morphometry analysis of group differences in fractional anisotropy in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Arvind Caprihan; Chris Abbott; Jeremy Yamamoto; Godfrey Pearlson; Nora Perrone-Bizzozero; Jing Sui; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

9.  Mutually temporally independent connectivity patterns: a new framework to study the dynamics of brain connectivity at rest with application to explain group difference based on gender.

Authors:  Maziar Yaesoubi; Robyn L Miller; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Testosterone and aggressive behavior in man.

Authors:  Menelaos L Batrinos
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-30
View more
  11 in total

1.  Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Anderson; Keith A Harenski; Carla L Harenski; Michael R Koenigs; Jean Decety; Vince D Calhoun; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Sex is predicted by spatial memory multivariate activation patterns.

Authors:  Dylan S Spets; Scott D Slotnick
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Development of sex differences in the human brain.

Authors:  Florian Kurth; Christian Gaser; Eileen Luders
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.550

4.  Editorial: Bridging Gaps Between Sex and Gender in Neurosciences.

Authors:  Annie Duchesne; Belinda Pletzer; Marina A Pavlova; Meng-Chuan Lai; Gillian Einstein
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Findings from machine learning in clinical medical imaging applications - Lessons for translation to the forensic setting.

Authors:  Carlos A Peña-Solórzano; David W Albrecht; Richard B Bassed; Michael D Burke; Matthew R Dimmock
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Cross-sex shifts in two brain imaging phenotypes and their relation to polygenic scores for same-sex sexual behavior: A study of 18,645 individuals from the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Christoph Abé; Alexander Lebedev; Ruyue Zhang; Lina Jonsson; Sarah E Bergen; Martin Ingvar; Mikael Landén; Qazi Rahman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.399

7.  Brain structure changes associated with sexual orientation.

Authors:  Mikhail Votinov; Katharina S Goerlich; Andrei A Puiu; Elke Smith; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat; Birgit Derntl; Ute Habel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Patch individual filter layers in CNNs to harness the spatial homogeneity of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Fabian Eitel; Jan Philipp Albrecht; Martin Weygandt; Friedemann Paul; Kerstin Ritter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Is it left or is it right? A classification approach for investigating hemispheric differences in low and high dimensionality.

Authors:  Patrick Friedrich; Kaustubh R Patil; Lisa N Mochalski; Xuan Li; Julia A Camilleri; Jean-Philippe Kröll; Lisa Wiersch; Simon B Eickhoff; Susanne Weis
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Are Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure Associated With Sex Differences in Behavior?

Authors:  Liza van Eijk; Dajiang Zhu; Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Lachlan T Strike; Anthony J Lee; Narelle K Hansell; Paul M Thompson; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie L McMahon; Margaret J Wright; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.