Hye Jin Kim1, Hyo Jung Cho2, Bohyun Kim1, Myung-Won You3, Jei Hee Lee1, Jimi Huh1, Jai Keun Kim1. 1. Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complex-based chemical shift imaging-based magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) is emerging as a preferred method for noninvasively quantifying proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a promising quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) for longitudinal hepatic steatosis measurement. PURPOSE: To determine linearity, bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of the PDFF measurement using CSE-MRI (CSE-PDFF) across scan intervals, MR field strengths, and readers in phantom and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. STUDY TYPE: Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective. SUBJECTS: Fat-water phantom and 20 adult patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR systems and a commercially available CSE-MRI sequence (IDEAL-IQ). ASSESSMENT: Two independent readers measured CSE-PDFF of fat-water phantom and NAFLD patients across two field strengths and scan intervals (same-day and 2-week) each and in a combination of both. MR spectroscopy-based PDFF (MRS-PDFF) was used as the reference standard for phantom PDFF. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linearity and bias of measurement were evaluated by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by coefficient of variance and repeatability / reproducibility coefficients (RC). The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to validate intra- and interobserver agreements. RESULTS: CSE-PDFF showed high linearity and small bias (-0.6-0.4 PDFF%) with 95% limits of agreement within ±2.9 PDFF% across field strengths, 2-week interscan period, and readers in the clinical scans. CSE-PDFF was highly repeatable and reproducible both in phantom and clinical scans, with the largest observed RC across field strengths and 2-week interscan period being 3 PDFF%. DATA CONCLUSION: CSE-PDFF is a robust QIB with high linearity, small bias, and excellent repeatability/reproducibility. A change of more than 3 PDFF% across field strengths within 2 weeks of scan interval likely reflects a true change, which is well within the clinically acceptable range. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:305-314.
BACKGROUND: Complex-based chemical shift imaging-based magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) is emerging as a preferred method for noninvasively quantifying proton density fat fraction (PDFF), a promising quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) for longitudinal hepatic steatosis measurement. PURPOSE: To determine linearity, bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of the PDFF measurement using CSE-MRI (CSE-PDFF) across scan intervals, MR field strengths, and readers in phantom and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. STUDY TYPE: Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective. SUBJECTS: Fat-water phantom and 20 adult patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T and 3.0 T MR systems and a commercially available CSE-MRI sequence (IDEAL-IQ). ASSESSMENT: Two independent readers measured CSE-PDFF of fat-water phantom and NAFLDpatients across two field strengths and scan intervals (same-day and 2-week) each and in a combination of both. MR spectroscopy-based PDFF (MRS-PDFF) was used as the reference standard for phantom PDFF. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linearity and bias of measurement were evaluated by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots, respectively. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by coefficient of variance and repeatability / reproducibility coefficients (RC). The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to validate intra- and interobserver agreements. RESULTS: CSE-PDFF showed high linearity and small bias (-0.6-0.4 PDFF%) with 95% limits of agreement within ±2.9 PDFF% across field strengths, 2-week interscan period, and readers in the clinical scans. CSE-PDFF was highly repeatable and reproducible both in phantom and clinical scans, with the largest observed RC across field strengths and 2-week interscan period being 3 PDFF%. DATA CONCLUSION: CSE-PDFF is a robust QIB with high linearity, small bias, and excellent repeatability/reproducibility. A change of more than 3 PDFF% across field strengths within 2 weeks of scan interval likely reflects a true change, which is well within the clinically acceptable range. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:305-314.
Authors: Houchun H Hu; Takeshi Yokoo; Mustafa R Bashir; Claude B Sirlin; Diego Hernando; Dariya Malyarenko; Thomas L Chenevert; Mark A Smith; Suraj D Serai; Michael S Middleton; Walter C Henderson; Gavin Hamilton; Jean Shaffer; Yunhong Shu; Jean A Tkach; Andrew T Trout; Nancy Obuchowski; Jean H Brittain; Edward F Jackson; Scott B Reeder Journal: Radiology Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Anton Faron; Nils Lehnen; Alois Martin Sprinkart; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Alexander Radbruch; Ulrike Attenberger; Guido Matthias Kukuk; Petra Mürtz Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Lavanya Athithan; Gaurav S Gulsin; Michael J House; Wenjie Pang; Emer M Brady; Joanne Wormleighton; Kelly S Parke; Matthew Graham-Brown; Tim G St Pierre; Eylem Levelt; Gerry P McCann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240