Literature DB >> 30430251

The effect of patient positioning on the relative position of the aorta to the thoracic spine.

N Plataniotis1,2, D S Evangelopoulos3, G Katzouraki1, S Pneumaticos1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the thoracic aorta is crucial for thoracolumbar spinal surgery. The purpose of the present study is to describe the relative displacement of the aorta to the spine in supine, prone and prone position with padding. Improved understanding of the magnitude and direction of this often-overlooked change could benefit preoperative planning and decision-making.
METHODS: A total of 200 patients underwent CT scan of the thoracic spine in the standard supine, prone and prone position with padding. Axial CT images from T4 to T12, in all three different positions, were selected and the following parameters were measured: (a) distance B connecting left pedicle entry point to the edge of the aortic wall and (b) projections Bx and By, representing the minimum AP depth and horizontal displacement of the aortic wall relative to the left pedicle entry point O.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the distance B between the three different positions across all thoracic vertebrae levels, confirming that positioning significantly affects aorta's relative position. Moreover, in the prone position with padding at the level of T6, the aortic wall lies at a minimum distance from the left pedicular axis and thus from the typical screw trajectory.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that prone positioning for posterior thoracolumbar approach affects significantly the anatomic relationship of the aorta to the spine. Surgeons should be aware that standard supine CT evaluation represents a static technique, which can differ considerably from surgical reality. These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient positioning; Relative position of thoracic aorta; Thoracolumbar spine surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 30430251     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5812-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

Review 1.  Results of thoracoscopic instrumented fusion versus conventional posterior instrumented fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing selective thoracic fusion.

Authors:  Hee-Kit Wong; Hwan-Tak Hee; Zhirong Yu; David Wong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Screw position after double-rod anterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis: an evaluation using computerized tomography.

Authors:  Geertje C Huitema; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; André van Ooij
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine before and after anterior instrumentation in right thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  Viola Bullmann; Eva M Fallenberg; Norbert Meier; Roman Fischbach; Thomas Lerner; Tobias L Schulte; Nani Osada; Ulf R Liljenqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anterior dual rod instrumentation in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: a computed tomography analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and the spinal canal.

Authors:  Viola Bullmann; Eva M Fallenberg; Norbert Meier; Roman Fischbach; Tobias L Schulte; Walter L Heindel; Ulf R Liljenqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Indications and techniques for anterior-only and combined anterior and posterior approaches for thoracic and lumbar spine deformities.

Authors:  Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2005

6.  The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  Weijun Wang; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Bin Wang; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Analysis of screw placement relative to the aorta and spinal canal following anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Sucato; Farid Kassab; Molly Dempsey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Sucato; Clark Duchene
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with left thoracic scoliosis: a comparison with normal patients.

Authors:  Todd A Milbrandt; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The position of the aorta relative to the spine: is it mobile or not?

Authors:  Geertje C Huitema; Erwin M J Cornips; Martijn H Castelijns; André van Ooij; Henk van Santbrink; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Different angular kyphosis locations have different relative positions of aorta to spine in patients with Pott's deformity.

Authors:  Heng Jiang; Taotao Liao; Zhengyu Lu; Ce Wang; Rui Gao; Jun Ma; Xuhui Zhou; Jianquan Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  Substantial Distortion of the Aorta During Celiac Plexus Stereotactic Body Radiation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Dana Keilty; Jeff D Winter; Sophie Weiwei Gao; Vickay Pfoh; Andrew Belanger; Teodor Stanescu; Aisling Barry; Yaacov Lawrence; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.