N Plataniotis1,2, D S Evangelopoulos3, G Katzouraki1, S Pneumaticos1. 1. 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece. 2. Department of Radiology, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece. 3. 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT Hospital, Athens, Greece. ds.evangelopoulos@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the thoracic aorta is crucial for thoracolumbar spinal surgery. The purpose of the present study is to describe the relative displacement of the aorta to the spine in supine, prone and prone position with padding. Improved understanding of the magnitude and direction of this often-overlooked change could benefit preoperative planning and decision-making. METHODS: A total of 200 patients underwent CT scan of the thoracic spine in the standard supine, prone and prone position with padding. Axial CT images from T4 to T12, in all three different positions, were selected and the following parameters were measured: (a) distance B connecting left pedicle entry point to the edge of the aortic wall and (b) projections Bx and By, representing the minimum AP depth and horizontal displacement of the aortic wall relative to the left pedicle entry point O. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the distance B between the three different positions across all thoracic vertebrae levels, confirming that positioning significantly affects aorta's relative position. Moreover, in the prone position with padding at the level of T6, the aortic wall lies at a minimum distance from the left pedicular axis and thus from the typical screw trajectory. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that prone positioning for posterior thoracolumbar approach affects significantly the anatomic relationship of the aorta to the spine. Surgeons should be aware that standard supine CT evaluation represents a static technique, which can differ considerably from surgical reality. These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.
PURPOSE: Detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the thoracic aorta is crucial for thoracolumbar spinal surgery. The purpose of the present study is to describe the relative displacement of the aorta to the spine in supine, prone and prone position with padding. Improved understanding of the magnitude and direction of this often-overlooked change could benefit preoperative planning and decision-making. METHODS: A total of 200 patients underwent CT scan of the thoracic spine in the standard supine, prone and prone position with padding. Axial CT images from T4 to T12, in all three different positions, were selected and the following parameters were measured: (a) distance B connecting left pedicle entry point to the edge of the aortic wall and (b) projections Bx and By, representing the minimum AP depth and horizontal displacement of the aortic wall relative to the left pedicle entry point O. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the distance B between the three different positions across all thoracic vertebrae levels, confirming that positioning significantly affects aorta's relative position. Moreover, in the prone position with padding at the level of T6, the aortic wall lies at a minimum distance from the left pedicular axis and thus from the typical screw trajectory. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that prone positioning for posterior thoracolumbar approach affects significantly the anatomic relationship of the aorta to the spine. Surgeons should be aware that standard supine CT evaluation represents a static technique, which can differ considerably from surgical reality. These slides can be retrieved from electronic supplementary material.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient positioning; Relative position of thoracic aorta; Thoracolumbar spine surgery
Authors: Viola Bullmann; Eva M Fallenberg; Norbert Meier; Roman Fischbach; Thomas Lerner; Tobias L Schulte; Nani Osada; Ulf R Liljenqvist Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Viola Bullmann; Eva M Fallenberg; Norbert Meier; Roman Fischbach; Tobias L Schulte; Walter L Heindel; Ulf R Liljenqvist Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Weijun Wang; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Bin Wang; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-05-31 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Geertje C Huitema; Erwin M J Cornips; Martijn H Castelijns; André van Ooij; Henk van Santbrink; Lodewijk W van Rhijn Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Dana Keilty; Jeff D Winter; Sophie Weiwei Gao; Vickay Pfoh; Andrew Belanger; Teodor Stanescu; Aisling Barry; Yaacov Lawrence; Laura A Dawson Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-03-06