Literature DB >> 17515812

The position of the aorta relative to the spine: is it mobile or not?

Geertje C Huitema1, Erwin M J Cornips, Martijn H Castelijns, André van Ooij, Henk van Santbrink, Lodewijk W van Rhijn.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study analyzes the mobility of the aorta relative to the spine in patients with a herniated thoracic disc requiring surgical intervention.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the mobility of the aorta relative to the spine with the patient in prone and supine position. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In anterior scoliosis surgery, safe screw placement is important and knowledge of the position of the aorta relative to the spine is crucial. To the authors' knowledge, there are no studies on the mobility of the aorta relative to the spine with the patient in different positions.
METHODS: All 50 patients before surgery had a computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) scans of the involved spinal segment in supine position, as well as a CT with intrathecal contrast in prone position. The aorta-vertebral angle and the aorta-vertebral distance were measured on as many levels as possible.
RESULTS: In supine position, the aorta is positioned left lateral to the vertebral body at midthoracic levels (T4-T8) and more anterior to the vertebral body at lower thoracic levels (T9-L2). In prone position, the aorta moves to a more anteromedial position relative to the vertebra, which is most significant at levels T4 to T8. The mediolateral aorta-vertebral distance according to Sevastik is shorter in prone position, whereas the anterior-posterior distance according to Sucato is larger, especially at levels T5 to T10.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a substantial difference in the position of the aorta relative to the spine in prone and in supine position, which is most markedly seen at levels T4 to T8. The aorta is positioned posterolateral to the spine in supine position and more anteromedial in prone position. Before performing anterior thoracolumbar spine surgery, we suggest to measure vertebral body width, as well as the position of the aorta in the prone and in the supine patient to decide if his approach is technically feasible, or if an alternative (contralateral) approach is preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17515812     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180592c4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Toru Maruyama; Takashi Ono; Satoshi Ogihara; Hirotaka Chikuda; Naoki Shoda; Yusuke Nakao; Ko Matsudaira; Atsushi Seichi; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of patient positioning on the relative position of the aorta to the thoracic spine.

Authors:  N Plataniotis; D S Evangelopoulos; G Katzouraki; S Pneumaticos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  How to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar vertebrae: analysis base on three-dimensional CT reconstruction of patients in the prone position.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Qingxian Hou; Yanchen Chu; Xiuling Huang; Wenjiu Yang; Jinglong Ma; Zhijie Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Substantial Distortion of the Aorta During Celiac Plexus Stereotactic Body Radiation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Dana Keilty; Jeff D Winter; Sophie Weiwei Gao; Vickay Pfoh; Andrew Belanger; Teodor Stanescu; Aisling Barry; Yaacov Lawrence; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.