Rafaella F Xavier1, Ana Carolina A C Pereira1, Aline C Lopes1, Vinícius Cavalheri2,3, Regina M C Pinto4, Alberto Cukier4, Ercy M C Ramos5, Celso R F Carvalho6,7. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia. 3. Institute for Respiratory Health, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia. 4. Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Clinics Hospital, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Physical Therapy, State University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. cscarval@usp.br. 7. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455, Room 1210, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil. cscarval@usp.br.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) present high prevalence of physical inactivity that leads to a negative effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study investigated COPD phenotypes according to their levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, as well as body composition and skeletal muscle strength. METHODS: This is an observational and cross-sectional study. Anthropometric data and COPD clinical control were collected and all participants underwent assessments of lung function, HRQoL, dyspnoea, levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, body composition and skeletal muscle strength. Participants were classified using hierarchical cluster analysis. Age, dyspnoea and obstruction (ADO) index was used to determine prognosis and calculated for each cluster. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Three distinct phenotypes were identified. Participants in phenotype 1 were more physically active, less sedentary and had better body composition and lower ADO index (p < 0.0001 for all variables). Overall, participants in phenotypes 2 and 3 were less physically active, more sedentary having a higher ADO index. However, participants in phenotype 2 were older, whereas participants in phenotype 3 had worse HRQoL, clinical control and body composition. Lung function did not differ across the three phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that physical activity, sedentary behaviour and body composition should be considered to determine phenotypes in people with COPD and are involved in the prognosis of the disease. Less sedentary patients have better prognosis while age, body composition and clinical control seems to differentiate physically inactive patients.
INTRODUCTION:People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) present high prevalence of physical inactivity that leads to a negative effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study investigated COPD phenotypes according to their levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, as well as body composition and skeletal muscle strength. METHODS: This is an observational and cross-sectional study. Anthropometric data and COPD clinical control were collected and all participants underwent assessments of lung function, HRQoL, dyspnoea, levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, body composition and skeletal muscle strength. Participants were classified using hierarchical cluster analysis. Age, dyspnoea and obstruction (ADO) index was used to determine prognosis and calculated for each cluster. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Three distinct phenotypes were identified. Participants in phenotype 1 were more physically active, less sedentary and had better body composition and lower ADO index (p < 0.0001 for all variables). Overall, participants in phenotypes 2 and 3 were less physically active, more sedentary having a higher ADO index. However, participants in phenotype 2 were older, whereas participants in phenotype 3 had worse HRQoL, clinical control and body composition. Lung function did not differ across the three phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that physical activity, sedentary behaviour and body composition should be considered to determine phenotypes in people with COPD and are involved in the prognosis of the disease. Less sedentary patients have better prognosis while age, body composition and clinical control seems to differentiate physically inactive patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Daily life physical activity; Health-related quality of life; Muscle mass; Prognosis
Authors: MeiLan K Han; Alvar Agusti; Peter M Calverley; Bartolome R Celli; Gerard Criner; Jeffrey L Curtis; Leonardo M Fabbri; Jonathan G Goldin; Paul W Jones; William Macnee; Barry J Make; Klaus F Rabe; Stephen I Rennard; Frank C Sciurba; Edwin K Silverman; Jørgen Vestbo; George R Washko; Emiel F M Wouters; Fernando J Martinez Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Pierre-Régis Burgel; Jean-Louis Paillasseur; Bernard Peene; Daniel Dusser; Nicolas Roche; Johan Coolen; Thierry Troosters; Marc Decramer; Wim Janssens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hans Van Remoortel; Yogini Raste; Zafeiris Louvaris; Santiago Giavedoni; Chris Burtin; Daniel Langer; Frederick Wilson; Roberto Rabinovich; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Thierry Troosters Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thys van der Molen; Brigitte W M Willemse; Siebrig Schokker; Nick H T ten Hacken; Dirkje S Postma; Elizabeth F Juniper Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2003-04-28 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Rafael Mesquita; Gabriele Spina; Fabio Pitta; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Brenda M Deering; Mehul S Patel; Katy E Mitchell; Jennifer Alison; Arnoldus Jr van Gestel; Stefanie Zogg; Philippe Gagnon; Beatriz Abascal-Bolado; Barbara Vagaggini; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Sue C Jenkins; Elisabeth Apm Romme; Samantha Sc Kon; Paul S Albert; Benjamin Waschki; Dinesh Shrikrishna; Sally J Singh; Nicholas S Hopkinson; David Miedinger; Roberto P Benzo; François Maltais; Pierluigi Paggiaro; Zoe J McKeough; Michael I Polkey; Kylie Hill; William D-C Man; Christian F Clarenbach; Nidia A Hernandes; Daniela Savi; Sally Wootton; Karina C Furlanetto; Li W Cindy Ng; Anouk W Vaes; Christine Jenkins; Peter R Eastwood; Diana Jarreta; Anne Kirsten; Dina Brooks; David R Hillman; Thaís Sant'Anna; Kenneth Meijer; Selina Dürr; Erica Pa Rutten; Malcolm Kohler; Vanessa S Probst; Ruth Tal-Singer; Esther Garcia Gil; Albertus C den Brinker; Jörg D Leuppi; Peter Ma Calverley; Frank Wjm Smeenk; Richard W Costello; Marco Gramm; Roger Goldstein; Miriam Tj Groenen; Helgo Magnussen; Emiel Fm Wouters; Richard L ZuWallack; Oliver Amft; Henrik Watz; Martijn A Spruit Journal: Chron Respir Dis Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 2.444
Authors: Xin Zhang; Ke Deng; Yulai Yuan; Lei Liu; Shuwen Zhang; Changyong Wang; Gang Wang; Hongping Zhang; Lei Wang; Gaiping Cheng; Lisa G Wood; Gang Wang Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Alda Marques; Sara Souto-Miranda; Ana Machado; Ana Oliveira; Cristina Jácome; Joana Cruz; Vera Enes; Vera Afreixo; Vitória Martins; Lília Andrade; Carla Valente; Diva Ferreira; Paula Simão; Dina Brooks; Ana Helena Tavares Journal: Respir Res Date: 2022-02-14