| Literature DB >> 30430010 |
Laura D Klein1,2, Jincui Huang3, Elizabeth A Quinn4, Melanie A Martin5,6, Alicia A Breakey1, Michael Gurven5, Hillard Kaplan7, Claudia Valeggia8, Grazyna Jasienska9, Brooke Scelza10, Carlito B Lebrilla3, Katie Hinde1,11,12.
Abstract
LAYEntities:
Keywords: SIgA; human milk; lactoferin; maternal ecology; milk immunofactors
Year: 2018 PMID: 30430010 PMCID: PMC6222208 DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoy031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Med Public Health ISSN: 2050-6201
Selected functions of acquired and innate immune proteins in human milk
| Protein | Functions | References |
|---|---|---|
| Lactoferrin | Bacteriostatic, antibacterial, and antiviral activities Modulates inflammation Regulates intestinal cell proliferation and differentiation | [ |
| Lysozyme | Disrupts cell membranes in gram-positive bacteria Acts in conjunction with lactoferrin to kill gram-negative bacteria Stimulates maturation of intestinal tract Promotes beneficial gut microbiome profiles in animal models | [ |
| Lactalbumin | Primary role as a regulatory subunit of lactase synthase Alpha-lactalbumin can also combine with oleic acid to form a protein complex (HAMLET) capable of killing tumor cells | [ |
| SIgA | Primary antibody for mucosal defense and the most abundant immunoglobulin in human milk Specific antibodies have been identified to most major classes of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and yeasts Reflect pathogens encountered by the mother during her lifetime Thought to have lasting beneficial effects on the infants’ gut microbiome and immune system regulation | [ |
| IgG | Present in human milk at much lower concentrations than SIgA Unlikely to resist digestion in the small intestine and likely plays a small role in providing passive immunity to the infant | [ |
| IgM | Present in human milk at much lower concentrations than SIgA Unlikely to resist digestion in the small intestine and likely plays a small role in providing passive immunity to the infant | [ |
Variation in pathogen exposures across populations
| USA | Argentina | Philippines | Poland | Bolivia | Namibia | Nepal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston | Qom | Cebu | Rural Polish | Tsimane | Himba | Nubri Tibetan | |
| Routine exposure to livestock | |||||||
| Subsistence Horticulture/Agriculture | |||||||
| Routine hunting of wild animals | |||||||
| Dirt flooring in the home | |||||||
| Lack of indoor plumbing | |||||||
| Limited access to modern, western biomedical care |
This table is a visual summary of environmental characteristics that are suspected to contribute to increased pathogen exposure within these populations. No mark indicates the exposure is not present or rare in the population, a gray check mark (✓) indicates the exposure is variably present in the population, and a black check mark (✓) indicates the exposure is widespread in the population.
Summary of participant characteristics
| Country | Population | Infant sex (male) | Infant age (days) ( | Parity ( | Primiparous | Subsistence Strategy | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Boston, MA | 21 | 7 (33%) | 197.8 ± 21.5 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 11 (52%) | Urban-industrial | |
| Argentina | Qom (Toba) | 18 | 9 (50%) | 236.5 ± 22.8 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3 (17%) | Rural-shop | [ |
| Philippines | Cebu | 17 | 8 (47%) | 190.0 ± 25.2 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 4 (24%) | Rural-shop | [ |
| Poland | Mogielica Human Ecology Study Site | 22 | 12 (55%) | 187.4 ± 20.3 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 10 (45%) | Rural-shop | [ |
| Bolivia | Tsimane | 47 | 28 (60%) | 265.1 ± 23.4 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 6 (13%) | Horticulturalist- forager | [ |
| Namibia | Himbaa | 11 | 5 (45%) | 172.0 ± 40.7 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 2 (18%) | Agro-pastoralist | [ |
| Nepal | Nubri Tibetan | 28 | 13 (46%) | 240.5 ± 34.0 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 13 (46%) | Agro-pastoralist | [54, 55] |
| TOTAL | 164 | 82 (50%) | 224.7 ± 10.8 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 49 (21%) |
Indicates an indigenous population.
Figure 1.Milk immune protein concentrations visualized for all participants. This heatmap shows the relative protein concentrations for all individuals. Each column is an individual and each row is a protein (LA, lactalbumin; LF, lactoferrin; LZ, lysozyme; SIgA, Secretory Immunoglobulin A; IgG, Immunoglobulin G; IgM, Immunoglobulin M). Shading represents individual’s value as a z-score above (more yellow) or below (more purple) the mean for that protein across all individuals in the study
Summary of population immune protein concentrations
| INNATE | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactalbumin (mg/L) | Lysozyme (mg/L) | Lactoferrin (mg/L) | |||||||||||
| mean | SD | min | max | mean | SD | min | max | mean | SD | min | max | ||
| USA | 21 | 570.39 | 64.49 | 436.84 | 667.65 | 18.13 | 11.07 | 5.36 | 54.77 | 436.63 | 87.53 | 258.04 | 613.78 |
| Argentina | 18 | 559.98 | 111.09 | 232.62 | 710.51 | 18.69 | 14.05 | 3.86 | 58.40 | 556.24 | 260.33 | 192.05 | 1082.19 |
| Philippines | 17 | 534.09 | 111.54 | 248.57 | 679.75 | 14.86 | 10.00 | 3.29 | 42.47 | 238.80 | 70.63 | 106.11 | 351.45 |
| Poland | 22 | 585.83 | 75.14 | 417.75 | 731.60 | 20.05 | 12.40 | 5.77 | 47.66 | 478.41 | 103.29 | 329.12 | 709.22 |
| Bolivia | 47 | 565.70 | 105.62 | 216.40 | 754.04 | 15.11 | 9.33 | 5.36 | 54.14 | 444.20 | 110.40 | 138.11 | 671.21 |
| Namibia | 11 | 574.83 | 67.81 | 484.73 | 702.72 | 16.51 | 9.23 | 3.67 | 35.00 | 464.73 | 163.45 | 194.06 | 731.16 |
| Nepal | 28 | 565.25 | 115.69 | 144.50 | 843.90 | 18.25 | 12.79 | 2.80 | 53.07 | 245.50 | 73.84 | 46.30 | 452.90 |
| TOTAL | 164 | 565.63 | 97.80 | 144.50 | 843.90 | 17.16 | 11.21 | 2.80 | 58.40 | 406.28 | 164.83 | 46.30 | 1082.19 |
Figure 2.Between-group principal components analysis plots. The four plots display a visualization of the between-group principal components analysis used to create a composite measure of the composition of innate (top row) or acquired (bottom row) immune proteins for each population (left column) or subsistence group (right column). The shaded area depicts the convex hull for each population or subsistence group
Pair-wise comparisons of immune protein composition between populations: η2 values (P-values)
| Country | USA | Argentina | Philippines | Poland | Bolivia | Namibia | Nepal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.12 (1) | 0.07 (1) | 0.04 (1) | 0.00 (1) | ||||
| 0.18 (0.411) | 0.06 (1) | 0.10 (1) | |||||
| 0.10 (0.613) | 0.02 (1) | ||||||
| 0.08 (0.852) | 0.03 (1) | ||||||
| 0.10 (0.193) | 0.04 (0.613) | 0.01 (1) | |||||
| 0.03 (0.613) |
The blue shaded boxes indicate the composition of innate immune proteins while the red shaded boxes indicate the composition of acquired immune proteins. Comparisons that are significantly different (P < 0.01) among subsistence patterns are bolded. P-values have been adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Holm method.
Pair-wise comparisons of immune protein composition between subsistence patterns: η2 values (P-values)
| Urban | Rural-shop | Horticulturalist-forager | Agro-pastoralist | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 (0.601 | 0.13 (0.029 | |||
| 0.09 (0.029) | 0.10 (0.029) | |||
| 0.04 (0.018) | ||||
The comparisons in the blue shaded boxes are for the composition of innate immune proteins. The comparisons in the red shaded boxes are for the composition of acquired immune proteins. Comparisons that are significantly different (P < 0.01) among subsistence patterns are bolded. P-values have been adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Holm method.