| Literature DB >> 30428603 |
Vera L S Freitas1, Maria D M C Ribeiro da Silva2.
Abstract
The present work addresses computational research focused on the energetic and structural properties of four isomers monohydroxyxanthone, using the G3(MP2)//B3LYP method, in order to evaluate the influence of the hydroxyl (-OH moiety) functional group on the xanthone molecule. The combination of these computational results with previous experimental data of these compounds enabled the determination of their enthalpies, entropies and Gibbs energies of formation, in the gaseous phase, and consequently to infer about the relative thermodynamic stability of the four isomers. Other issues were also addressed for the hydroxyxanthone isomers, namely the conformational and the tautomeric equilibrium analysis of the optimized molecular structures, the frontier orbitals, and the electrostatic potential energy maps. Complementarily, an energetic study of the intramolecular O - H ⋯ O hydrogen bond for 1-hydroxanthone was also performed.Entities:
Keywords: conformers; gas-phase enthalpy of formation; intramolecular hydrogen bond; monooxygenated xanthones; tautomers; thermodynamic properties
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30428603 PMCID: PMC6280152 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23112962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1General molecular formulae of the monohydroxyxanthones studied in this work: 1-hydroxyxanthone (1OHXT), 2-hydroxyxanthone (2OHXT), 3-hydroxyxanthone (3OHXT), and 4-hydroxyxanthone (4OHXT).
Conformational composition, χi, for most stable molecular geometries obtained by G3(MP2)//B3LYP composite method for monohydroxyxanthone isomers (1OHXT, 2OHXT, 3OHXT, and 4OHXT) .
| I | II | |
|---|---|---|
| 1OHXT |
|
|
| χi | 1.000 | 0 |
| 2OHXT |
|
|
| χi | 0.834 | 0.166 |
| 3OHXT |
|
|
| χi | 0.558 | 0.442 |
| 4OHXT |
|
|
| χi | 0.991 | 0.009 |
Spheres colour code: grey, C; red, O; white, H.
Figure 2Electrostatic potential energy surfaces mapped onto an electron density isosurface (isovalue for spin density of 0.0004 e·a0−3; where a0 is the Bohr radius and corresponds to 5.2917721067 × 10−11 m [28] and e is the electron charge, 1.6021766208 × 10−19 C [28]), and dipole moment values for the global minimum conformer of each monohydroxyxanthone isomer.
HOMO and LUMO maps (isovalue for molecular orbitals of 0.06 e⋅a0−3, where a0 is the Bohr radius) with the correspondent energies values, EHOMO and ELUMO, and the calculated energy gap, EGAP. 1 eV corresponds to 1.6021766208 × 10−19 J [28] .
| 1OHXT | 2OHXT | 3OHXT | 4OHXT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOMO |
|
|
|
|
| −6.91 | −6.65 | −6.52 | −6.72 | |
| LUMO |
|
|
|
|
| −0.05 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.37 | |
| 6.85 | 7.18 | 7.04 | 7.09 |
Spheres colour code: grey, C; red, O; white, H.
Energies values for 1-hydroxyxanthone conformers cis and trans, at T = 298.15 K, , obtained from G3(MP2)//B3LYP composite method for the calculation of the intramolecular hydrogen bond energy, . 1 a. u. (Hartree) corresponds to 2625.50 kJ mol−1 .
| Conformer |
| Conformer |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −724.834474 |
| −724.815651 | 49.4 |
Spheres colour code: grey, C; red, O; white, H.
Hypothetical gas-phase reactions for the theoretical study of monohydroxyxanthones.
| Reaction | Equations No. | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Y = CH | R1 |
| Y = N | R2 | |
|
| R3 | |
|
| Y = CH2 | R4 |
| Y = O | R5 | |
| Y = S | R6 | |
|
| Z = 1-OH | R7 |
| Z = 2-OH | R8 | |
|
| Z = 1-OH | R9 |
| Z = 2-OH | R10 | |
|
| R11 | |
|
| R12 | |
|
| Y = CH2 | R13 |
| Y = O | R14 | |
| Y = S | R15 | |
| Y = NH | R16 | |
|
| Z = 1-OH | R17 |
| Z = 2-OH | R18 | |
| Z = 9-OH | R19 |
Estimated standard gas-phase molar enthalpies of formation, , at T = 298.15 K for the monohydroxyxanthone conformers derived from hypothetical gas-phase reactions.
| 1OHXT | 2OHXT | 3OHXT | 4OHXT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conformer | I | I | II | I | II | I | II |
|
| |||||||
|
| −302.51 | −271.02 | −266.60 | −276.94 | −276.44 | −272.15 | −260.33 |
|
| −297.90 | −266.41 | −261.99 | −272.33 | −271.83 | −267.54 | −255.72 |
|
| −301.77 | −270.28 | −265.87 | −276.20 | −275.71 | −271.42 | −259.59 |
|
| −298.20 | −266.71 | −262.29 | −272.63 | −272.13 | −267.84 | −256.01 |
|
| −303.61 | −272.12 | −267.70 | −278.04 | −277.54 | −273.25 | −261.43 |
|
| −300.76 | −269.27 | −264.85 | −275.19 | −274.69 | −270.40 | −258.58 |
|
| −297.85 | −266.36 | −261.94 | −272.28 | −271.78 | −267.49 | −255.67 |
|
| −299.24 | −267.75 | −263.33 | −273.67 | −273.17 | −268.88 | −257.06 |
|
| −303.50 | −272.01 | −267.59 | −277.93 | −277.43 | −273.14 | −261.32 |
|
| −304.89 | −273.40 | −268.98 | −279.32 | −278.82 | −274.53 | −262.71 |
|
| −304.91 | −273.42 | −269.00 | −279.34 | −278.84 | −274.55 | −262.73 |
|
| −307.42 | −275.93 | −271.51 | −281.85 | −281.35 | −277.06 | −265.24 |
|
| −302.20 | −270.71 | −266.29 | −276.63 | −276.13 | −271.84 | −260.02 |
|
| −296.25 | −264.76 | −260.34 | −270.68 | −270.18 | −265.89 | −254.07 |
|
| −305.62 | −274.13 | −269.71 | −280.05 | −279.55 | −275.26 | −263.43 |
|
| −299.62 | −268.13 | −263.71 | −274.05 | −273.55 | −269.26 | −257.44 |
|
| −301.90 | −270.41 | −265.99 | −276.33 | −275.84 | −271.55 | −259.72 |
|
| −301.34 | −269.85 | −265.43 | −275.77 | −275.27 | −270.98 | −259.16 |
|
| −299.49 | −268.00 | −263.58 | −273.92 | −273.42 | −269.13 | −257.31 |
| Mean value | −301.5 ± 2.9 | −270.0 ± 2.9 | −265.6 ± 2.9 | −276.0 ± 2.9 | −275.5 ± 2.9 | −271.2 ± 2.9 | −259.3 ± 2.9 |
| X | 1.000 | 0.834 | 0.166 | 0.558 | 0.442 | 0.991 | 0.009 |
| Final value | −301.5 ± 2.9 | −269.3 ± 2.9 | −275.8 ± 2.9 | −271.1 ± 2.9 | |||
The uncertainty assigned correspond to the expanded uncertainty determined from the estimated standard deviation of the mean for 19 reactions and the coverage factor k = 2.101 (0.95 level of confidence and 18 degrees of freedom); Conformational composition; Final values for the gas-phase enthalpies of formation considering the conformation composition.
Estimated standard gas-phase molar enthalpies, entropies, and Gibbs energies of formation, respectively, for the monohydroxyxanthone isomers. at T = 298.15 K.
| Isomers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1OHXT | −301.5 ± 2.9 | −475.8 | −159.6 |
| 2OHXT | −269.3 ± 2.9 | −466.8 | −130.2 |
| 3OHXT | −275.8 ± 2.9 | −467.1 | −136.6 |
| 4OHXT | −271.1 ± 2.9 | −467.5 | −131.7 |
Final value obtained in Table 5; The calculation method of is given in more detail in Supplementary Materials (Table S1); Calculated from .