| Literature DB >> 30426855 |
Hyun-Yong Kim1,2, Jung-Ran Noh1, Sung-Je Moon1, Dong-Hee Choi1, Yong-Hoon Kim1,3, Kyoung-Shim Kim1,3, Hong-Sun Yook2, Jin-Pyo An4, Won-Keon Oh4, Jung Hwan Hwang1,3, Chul-Ho Lee1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of Sicyos angulatus (SA) ethanolic extracts as antioxidants and potential treatments for liver disease.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; apoptosis; enzyme; extracts; injury; liver; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30426855 PMCID: PMC6748690 DOI: 10.1080/13510002.2018.1546986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Rep ISSN: 1351-0002 Impact factor: 4.412
Figure
1.Effects of SA on ROS production in t-BHP-treated HepG2 cell. (A) The effects of SA on ROS production in t-BHP-treated HepG2 cells in 6-well plates were monitored using a florescence microscope (magnification 100×). (B) Total ROS production of t-BHP-treated HepG2 cells was measured using a fluorometer. The data are shown as the means ± SEM of three indicated experiments. *** p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test).
Figure
2.Effects of SA on ROS production in the liver after Con A exposure. Mice were subjected to Con A (15 mg/kg, IV) treatment with or without SA (IP). (A) Total production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the hepatic cytosolic fractions from vehicle- or SA-treated mice was assayed by measuring the fluorescence produced by 20 μM DCFH-DA. (B) H2O2 and (C) O2- production were estimated in the hepatic cytosolic fractions of liver from vehicle (n = 5) and SA treated mice (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared to Con A + Veh mice by Student’s t-test. (D) ALT and (E) AST levels were measured 6 h after Con A injection in mice. Normal: non-treated group (n = 5), Con A + Veh (n = 5): Vehicle- and Con A-treated group (n = 5), Con A + SA100 (n = 5): SA (100 mg/kg)- and Con A-treated group, Con A + SA300 (n = 5): SA (300 mg/kg)- and Con A-treated group.
Figure 3.Effects of SA on intracellular antioxidant enzyme activities. Mice were treated with 15 mg/kg of Con A with or without SA (100, 300 mg/kg). Six hours after Con A exposure, liver samples were taken from the mice. (A) MnSOD, Mn superoxide dismutase; (B) CAT, catalase; (C) GPx, glutathione peroxidase; and (D) GR, glutathione reductase levels, were measured by enzymatic assays. * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01 compared with the group treated with Con A-Veh (Student’s ttest).
Figure 4.Effect of SA on histological alterations and apoptosis in the liver after Con A exposure. Histological assessments were performed by H&E (magnification: 200× or 400×) (A) and TUNEL staining to detect apoptotic cells (magnification: 100×) (B). Scale bars, 100 μm or 200 μm. *p < 0.05 compared to Con A + Veh mice by Student’s t-test. Injury area and necrotic area presented as the percentage of liver section.
Figure 5.Effects of SA on apoptotic protein levels and neutrophil infiltration in Con A-treated HepG2 cells. The expression levels of apoptotic proteins was measured by western blotting. Concentration-dependent induction of (A) markers of apoptosis (Bax, Bcl-2, Bad, and Bim) in the HepG2 cells following treatment with SA and (B) mitochondrial release of apoptosis-related proteins (Smac/DIABLO, cytochrome C, and AIF) were detected in the cytosolic cell fractions by western blotting. β-actin was used as a loading control for each experiment. The data are representatives of three independent experiments. (C) Histological assessment was performed by immunohistochemical staining using an antibody against neutrophils, and representative images are displayed (original magnification: 100×). Arrows indicate neutrophils. Neutrophil counts in the liver tissues (right grape). ** Significantly different from the group treated with Con A-Veh, p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).