Literature DB >> 30426206

How do methane rates vary with soil moisture and compaction, N compound and rate, and dung addition in a tropical soil?

Abmael da Silva Cardoso1, Bruna Giovani Quintana2, Estella Rosseto Janusckiewicz2, Liziane de Figueiredo Brito2, Eliane da Silva Morgado3, Ricardo Andrade Reis2, Ana Claudia Ruggieri2.   

Abstract

Soil moisture and compaction, and source of N and bovine urine can reduce methane (CH4) rates from agricultural soils. However, the magnitude of the effect is unknown in tropical soil under different conditions, as well as the potential of different urine-N concentration, volume, and sources of N in such an effect. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different soil conditions (moist, dry, compacted, moist-dung, moist-dung-compacted), N concentration in urine (2.5, 5.0, 10.0, and 15.0 g N L-1), volume of urine (25, 50, 100, and 200 ml kg-1 dry soil), and source of N (ammonium, nitrate, and urea) on CH4 emissions. A tropical Ferralsol soil from marandu-grass pasture was incubated during 106 days and the CH4 concentration determined by gas chromatography. The CH4 rates varied significantly according to the soil conditions when manipulated the urine-N (p < 0.01) and averaged 0.75, - 0.50, 1.14, 6.23, and 8.17 μg C-CH4 m-2 h-1for the moist, dry, compacted, moist-dung, and moist-dung-compacted soil, respectively, and, not responded to the level of N (p = 0.73) averaging 2.57 μg C-CH4 m-2 h-1. When evaluated, the volumes of urine cumulative CH4 averages were - 0.52, - 1.24, - 0.88, 14.48, and 18.56 μg C-CH4 m-2 h-1 for the moist, dry, compacted, moist-dung, and moist-dung-compacted, respectively. Soils were affected by soil treatments (p < 0.001) but not by urine volumes (p = 0.30). The source of N did not influence the CH4 rates (p = 0.1) averaging 0.88, - 1.26, and - 1.19 μg C-CH4 m-2 h-1 respectively, for urea, nitrate, and ammonium. The CH4 fluxes in tropical Ferralsols are controlled by the soil characteristics and dung addition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon cycle; Ferralsol; Greenhouse gas; Nitrogen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30426206     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1641-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  9 in total

1.  Effect of land use on methane flux from soil.

Authors:  A S Chan; T B Parkin
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of methanogenic Archaea.

Authors:  J L Garcia; B K Patel; B Ollivier
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.331

3.  Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related.

Authors:  A J Holmes; A Costello; M E Lidstrom; J C Murrell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Changes in methane oxidation activity and methanotrophic community composition in saline alkaline soils.

Authors:  Nancy Serrano-Silva; César Valenzuela-Encinas; Rodolfo Marsch; Luc Dendooven; Rocio J Alcántara-Hernández
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Methane emission factors from cattle manure in Mexico.

Authors:  E González-Avalos; L G Ruiz-Suárez
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 6.  Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments.

Authors:  Paul L E Bodelier; Hendrikus J Laanbroek
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 7.  A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: the CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission.

Authors:  Lingli Liu; Tara L Greaver
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Effects of long-term nitrogen fertilization on the uptake kinetics of atmospheric methane in temperate forest soils.

Authors:  Jay Gulledge; Yarek Hrywna; Colleen Cavanaugh; Paul A Steudler
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  Nitrogen, tillage, and crop rotation effects on carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from irrigated cropping systems.

Authors:  Francesco Alluvione; Ardell D Halvorson; Stephen J Del Grosso
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 2.751

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.