Literature DB >> 19704145

Nitrogen, tillage, and crop rotation effects on carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from irrigated cropping systems.

Francesco Alluvione1, Ardell D Halvorson, Stephen J Del Grosso.   

Abstract

Long-term effects of tillage intensity, N fertilization, and crop rotation on carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and methane (CH(4)) flux from semiarid irrigated soils are poorly understood. We evaluated effects of: (i) tillage intensity [no-till (NT) and conventional moldboard plow tillage (CT)] in a continuous corn rotation; (ii) N fertilization levels [0-246 kg N ha(-1) for corn (Zea mays L.); 0 and 56 kg N ha(-1) for dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.); 0 and 112 kg N ha(-1) for barley (Hordeum distichon L.)]; and (iii) crop rotation under NT soil management [corn-barley (NT-CB); continuous corn (NT-CC); corn-dry bean (NT-CDb)] on CO(2) and CH(4) flux from a clay loam soil. Carbon dioxide and CH(4) fluxes were monitored one to three times per week using vented nonsteady state closed chambers. No-till reduced (14%) growing season (154 d) cumulative CO(2) emissions relative to CT (NT: 2.08 Mg CO(2)-C ha(-1); CT: 2.41 Mg CO(2)-C ha(-1)), while N fertilization had no effect. Significantly lower (18%) growing season CO(2) fluxes were found in NT-CDb than NT-CC and NT-CB (11.4, 13.2 and 13.9 kg CO(2)-C ha(-1)d(-1) respectively). Growing season CH(4) emissions were higher in NT (20.2 g CH(4) ha(-1)) than in CT (1.2 g CH(4) ha(-1)). Nitrogen fertilization and cropping rotation did not affect CH(4) flux. Implementation of NT for 7 yr with no N fertilization was not adequate for restoring the CH(4) oxidation capacity of this clay loam soil relative to CT plowed and fertilized soil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19704145     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

1.  How do methane rates vary with soil moisture and compaction, N compound and rate, and dung addition in a tropical soil?

Authors:  Abmael da Silva Cardoso; Bruna Giovani Quintana; Estella Rosseto Janusckiewicz; Liziane de Figueiredo Brito; Eliane da Silva Morgado; Ricardo Andrade Reis; Ana Claudia Ruggieri
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The influence of plants on atmospheric methane in an agriculture-dominated landscape.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Xuhui Lee; Timothy J Griffis; John M Baker; Matt D Erickson; Ning Hu; Wei Xiao
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Impacts of crop rotational diversity and grazing under integrated crop-livestock system on soil surface greenhouse gas fluxes.

Authors:  Gandura Omar Abagandura; Songul Şentürklü; Navdeep Singh; Sandeep Kumar; Douglas G Landblom; Kris Ringwall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Initial nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane costs of converting conservation reserve program grassland to row crops under no-till vs. conventional tillage.

Authors:  Leilei Ruan; G Philip Robertson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Comparison of soil respiration in typical conventional and new alternative cereal cropping systems on the North China plain.

Authors:  Bing Gao; Xiaotang Ju; Fang Su; Fengbin Gao; Qingsen Cao; Oene Oenema; Peter Christie; Xinping Chen; Fusuo Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.