| Literature DB >> 30426004 |
Soo Liang Ooi1, Ruth Green2, Sok Cheon Pak2.
Abstract
N-acetylcysteine, a sulphur-containing amino acid for the treatment of paracetamol overdose and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, is a widely available off-the-shelf oral antioxidant supplement in many countries. With the potential to modulate several neurological pathways, including glutamate dysregulation, oxidative stress, and inflammation that can be beneficial to the brain functions, N-acetylcysteine is being explored as an adjunctive therapy for many psychiatric conditions. This narrative review synthesises and presents the current evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and latest clinical trials on N-acetylcysteine for addiction and substance abuse, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, and mood disorders. Good evidence exists to support the use of N-acetylcysteine as an adjunct treatment to reduce the total and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. N-acetylcysteine also appears to be effective in reducing craving in substance use disorders, especially for the treatment of cocaine and cannabis use among young people, in addition to preventing relapse in already abstinent individuals. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, as well as on mood disorders, remain unclear with mixed reviews, even though promising evidence does exist. Larger and better-designed studies are required to further investigate the clinical effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in these areas. Oral N-acetylcysteine is safe and well tolerated without any considerable adverse effects. Current evidence supports its use as an adjunctive therapy clinically for psychiatric conditions, administered concomitantly with existing medications, with a recommended dosage between 2000 and 2400 mg/day.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30426004 PMCID: PMC6217900 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2469486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Structural formula of N-acetylcysteine.
Summary of included reviews: N-acetylcysteine for addiction and substance abuse disorders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asevedo et al. (2014) [ | SR | Clinical trials that assessed NAC with outcomes related to an addiction. | Total = 9 (n = 295): | Included studies suggest a potential role for NAC in the treatment of addiction, especially cocaine and cannabis dependence. |
|
| ||||
| Deepmala et al. (2015) [ | SR | Clinical trials of psychiatric and neurological disorders which reported a direct clinical effect of NAC as an outcome. | Total = 19 (n = 781): | Limited evidence for NAC as a treatment for addiction. Positive results for cocaine, but only for those who were abstinent. Some evidence for cannabis, even though results are inconsistent. Premature to make recommendations for or against the use of NAC in other types of addiction. |
|
| ||||
| Minarini et al. (2017) [ | SR | Clinical trials that assessed NAC use as the independent variable and clinical outcomes related to a psychiatric disorder. | Total = 18 (n = 711): | The clinical usefulness of NAC for SUDs, apart from cannabis use disorder in young people, is not currently supported by good enough evidence. |
|
| ||||
| Nocito Echevarria et al. (2017) [ | SR | Human or animal studies using NAC as an intervention for cocaine dependence. | Total (Cocaine) = 6 (n = 188) (Human trials only) | Promising data from preliminary studies, but results from a double-blind placebo trial was mainly negative. Current data suggest NAC may be better suited for avoiding relapse in already abstinent subjects. |
|
| ||||
| Duailibi et al. (2017) [ | SR+MA | RCTs of NAC for treatment of SUD with standardized assessment of craving. | Total = 7 (n = 245): | NAC was significantly superior for reducing craving symptoms compared to placebo (Hedges' g = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.55–1.33). NAC has a potential clinical use for craving in SUDs. |
. Confidence interval (CI); meta-analysis (MA); N-acetylcysteine (NAC); randomised control trial (RCT); substance use disorder (SUD); systematic review (SR).
Summary of included reviews: N-acetylcysteine for schizophrenia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen et al (2016) [ | SR | Double-blind RCTs of NAC in schizophrenia. | Total = 2 (n = 186) | Adjunctive NAC may be effective in reducing negative and general symptoms in schizophrenia. |
|
| ||||
| Zheng et al (2018) [ | SR+MA | All published randomised RCTs of NAC for major mental disorders with meta-analysable data. | Total = 3 (n = 307) | N-acetylcysteine significantly improved total psychopathology in schizophrenia (SMD = -0.74, 95% CI: -1.43, -0.06; I2 = 84%, P = 0.03). |
. Confidence interval (CI); meta-analysis (MA); N-acetylcysteine (NAC); randomised control trial (RCT); standard mean difference (SMD); systematic review (SR).
Summary of included reviews: N-acetylcysteine for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver el al. (2015) [ | SR | Human clinical trials or case reports involving diagnosed OCD or related disorders in which NAC was prescribed. | Total = 11 (n = 206): | Treatment with 2,400-3,000 mg/d of NAC in the included trials was found to reduce the severity of symptoms and demonstrate good tolerability with minimal adverse effects. |
|
| ||||
| Smith et al. (2016) [ | SR | Placebo RCTs investigated NAC for OCD and related disorders with behavioural outcome measures. | Total = 4 (n = 162): | Results remain inconclusive, but NAC may still be useful as a treatment for OCD and related disorders on an individual level given its safety records. |
|
| ||||
| Minarini et al. (2017) [ | SR | Clinical trials that assessed NAC use as the independent variable and clinical outcomes related to a psychiatric disorder. | Total = 20 (n = 421): | Promising results were found in trials testing the use of NAC as an add-on treatment for excoriation. Preliminary evidence warrants further investigation of the possible effectiveness NAC for OCD and related disorders. |
. Meta-analysis (MA); N-acetylcysteine (NAC); obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD); randomised control trial (RCT); systematic review (SR); tourette syndrome (TS); trichotillomania (TTM).
Summary of included reviews: N-acetylcysteine for mood disorders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernandes et al. (2016) [ | SR + MA | Double-blind RCTs of NAC versus placebo in adult subjects with presence of depressive symptoms. | Total = 5 (n = 574): | Treatment with NAC improved depressive symptoms as assessed by MADRS and HDRS compared to placebo (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.55; P < .001). |
|
| ||||
| Deepmala et al. (2015) [ | SR | Clinical trials of psychiatric and neurological disorders which reported a direct clinical effect of NAC as an outcome. | Total = 10 (n = 793): | NAC may lessen symptoms of bipolar disorder but may not affect the frequency of cycling between mood states. Results of NAC treatment for MDD is still mixed with further evidence required. |
|
| ||||
| Minarini et al. (2017) [ | SR | Clinical trials that assessed NAC use as the independent variable and clinical outcomes related to a psychiatric disorder. | Total = 12 (n = 868): | Results remain inconclusive with potential clinical application of NAC for depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder. |
|
| ||||
| Zheng et al. (2018) [ | SR+MA | All published randomised RCTs of NAC for major mental disorders with meta-analysable data. | Total = 3 (n = 394): | NAC had no significant effect on depressive and manic symptoms as assessed by the YMRS in bipolar disorder and only a small effect on major depressive symptoms. |
. Confidence interval (CI); standard mean difference (SMD); Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); major depressive disorder (MDD); meta-analysis (MA); Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); N-acetylcysteine (NAC); randomised control trial (RCT); systematic review (SR); Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).