| Literature DB >> 30425684 |
Wen Chen1, Graham Wilkes1, Izhar U H Khan1, Katarina D M Pintar2, Janis L Thomas3, C André Lévesque1, Julie T Chapados1, Edward Topp4, David R Lapen1.
Abstract
This study applied a 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding approach to characterize bacterial community compositional and functional attributes for surface water samples collected within, primarily, agriculturally dominated watersheds in Ontario and Québec, Canada. Compositional heterogeneity was best explained by stream order, season, and watercourse discharge. Generally, community diversity was higher at agriculturally dominated lower order streams, compared to larger stream order systems such as small to large rivers. However, during times of lower relative water flow and cumulative 2-day rainfall, modestly higher relative diversity was found in the larger watercourses. Bacterial community assemblages were more sensitive to environmental/land use changes in the smaller watercourses, relative to small-to-large river systems, where the proximity of the sampled water column to bacteria reservoirs in the sediments and adjacent terrestrial environment was greater. Stream discharge was the environmental variable most significantly correlated (all positive) with bacterial functional groups, such as C/N cycling and plant pathogens. Comparison of the community structural similarity via network analyses helped to discriminate sources of bacteria in freshwater derived from, for example, wastewater treatment plant effluent and intensity and type of agricultural land uses (e.g., intensive swine production vs. dairy dominated cash/livestock cropping systems). When using metabarcoding approaches, bacterial community composition and coexisting pattern rather than individual taxonomic lineages, were better indicators of environmental/land use conditions (e.g., upstream land use) and bacterial sources in watershed settings. Overall, monitoring changes and differences in aquatic microbial communities at regional and local watershed scales has promise for enhancing environmental footprinting and for better understanding nutrient cycling and ecological function of aquatic systems impacted by a multitude of stressors and land uses.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural watersheds; aquatic bacterial community; land use; metabarcoding; stream order
Year: 2018 PMID: 30425684 PMCID: PMC6218688 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Land use and water physiochemcial/environmental variables used for data mining.
| SITE_ID | Independent variable site identifier |
| STRAHLER | Numeric size of sample site stream/watercourse (Strahler, |
| SEASON | Sampling time based on solstice and equinox dates |
| WAT_AMIA_AMN | NH3 (ammonia) + NH4 (ammonium) concentration in sample water (mg L−1) |
| WAT_SUSSOL | Suspended sediments/solids in sample water (mg L−1) |
| WAT_NITRATE | NO |
| WAT_REA_PHOS | Reactive phosphorus concentration in sample water (mg L−1) |
| WAT_TOTKN | Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) concentration in sample water (mg L−1) |
| WAT_TOTPHO | Total phosphorus concentration in sample water (mg L−1) |
| WAT_TEMP_C | Temperature of sample water (°C) |
| WAT_PH | pH of sample water |
| WAT_CONDUCTIVITY_MSC | Specific conductivity of sample water (mS cm−1) |
| WAT_DISS_OXYGEN_MGL | Dissolved oxygen in sample water (mg L−1) |
| WAT_ORP_MV | Oxidation reduction potential of sample water (mV) |
| WAT_TURBIDITY_NTU | Cloudiness of sample water as measured with a nephelometer sensor (NTU; nephelometric turbidity units) |
| RU_DISM3S | Mean daily river discharge at Russell hydrometric station (m3 s−1) |
| WEBS_RAIN_MM WEBS_RAIN_MM_xD | Total rainfall at WEBs for day of sampling; total rainfall for day of sampling and × = 1, 2, 3, and 5 days in advance of sampling day (mm) |
| WEBS_MX_TEMP_CWEBS_MIN_TEMP_C | Daily maximum, minimum air temperature at WEBs |
| WEBS_SLR_RAD_WM2 | Daily average incoming solar radiation at WEBs (W m−2) |
| BASIN_(land use) | Proportion of year 2012 land use (determined via RS) in total sample site catchment area: agriculture (BASIN_AGRICULTURE), urban/developed (BASIN_URBDEV), treed/forest (BASIN_TREE), wetland (BASIN_WETLAND), and other land uses (BASIN_OTHER) (km2 km−2) |
| DEVELP_05K | Proportion of developed land, identified via RS, in catchment areas upstream of site with MUFL of 5 km (km2 km−2) in year in which sample was collected |
| AG_05K | Proportion of agricultural land, identified via RS, in catchment areas upstream of site with MUFL of 5 km (km2 km−2) in year in which sample was collected |
All variables (sans SITE_ID) were used as independent predictor variables in CART analyses. x, number of days in advance of sample; K, km; RS, remote sensing; MUFL, maximum upstream flow length.
Figure 1The sampling sites in the current study. (A) Southern Ontario and Québec; (B–D) the sampling sites at (B) the Bras d'Henri (BH) River, (C) the Grand River (GR); and (D) the South Nation River area (SNRA); (E) the relative location of the sampling sites in North America.
Bacterial diversity indices at each watershed.
| SN_1 | Drinking water intake (~6 m from surface) | 2371 | 9 | 52 | 2 | 42 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0.99 ± 0 | 276 ± 23 | 560 ± 69 | 30 ± 2 | 14 ± 1 |
| SN_5 | Tributary, Mixed Urban/Agricultrue development | 81 | 6 | 65 | 2 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 328 ± 72 | 968 ± 251 | 36 ± 19 | 13 ± 5 |
| SN_6 | Tributary, Mixed Urban/Agricultrue development | 176 | 7 | 54 | 1 | 43 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 262 ± 57 | 737 ± 267 | 23 ± 9 | 8 ± 1 |
| SN_8 | Main river | 1413 | 8 | 49 | 1 | 46 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.99 ± 0 | 235 ± 29 | 382 ± 30 | 32 ± 6 | 15 ± 3 |
| SN_9 | Tributary, Mixed Urban/Agricultrue development | 54 | 6 | 72 | 1 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0.99± | 96± | 190± | 9± | 5± |
| SN_18 | Agriculture stream (Dairy cattle farms) | <5 | 3 | 90 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 504 ± 130 | 1491 ± 327 | 110 ± 79 | 41 ± 33 |
| SN_20 | Agriculture stream | <5 | 4 | 90 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 500 ± 120 | 1383 ± 304 | 82 ± 35 | 26 ± 13 |
| SN_22 | Agriculture stream (Dairy cattle farms) | <5 | 3 | 90 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.89± | 256± | 664± | 35± | 10± |
| SN_24 | Forest/wetland | <5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 378 ± 94 | 1059 ± 244 | 24 ± 10 | 7 ± 2 |
| BH_1 | Tributary of BH-5 | 2.4 | 2 | 85 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.81± | 544± | 1520± | 188± | 64± |
| BH_2 | Tributary of BH-5 | 4.2 | 2 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.62± | 736± | 2690± | 333± | 94± |
| BH_3 | Agriculture stream of BH-1 | 1.6 | 1 | 78 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.87 ± 0.1 | 493 ± 276 | 1426 ± 991 | 97 ± 67 | 19 ± 5 |
| BH_4 | Agriculture stream of BH-1 | 0.8 | 1 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 1050 ± 430 | 2941 ± 1226 | 448 ± 170 | 133 ± 20 |
| BH_5 | Main river | 167 | 3 | 66 | 5 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.83± | 779± | 1562± | 311± | 99± |
| GR_1 | Drinking water intake | 2485 | 7 | 74 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0.99 ± 0 | 226 ± 28 | 408 ± 64 | 26 ± 2 | 12 ± 1 |
| GR_2 | WWTP outflow | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 0.9 ± 0.01 | 224 ± 39 | 733 ± 150 | 31 ± 3 | 12 ± 3 | |
| GR_6 | Recreation beach (Shade Mill) | 100 | 6 | 34 | 7 | 50 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 0.99 ± 0 | 176 ± 27 | 314 ± 71 | 28 ± 4 | 14 ± 3 |
| GR_7 | Recreation beach (Laurel Creek) | 31 | 5 | 48 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0.99 ± 0 | 211 ± 28 | 384 ± 48 | 21 ± 2 | 9 ± 1 |
| GR_8 | Recreation main river (Elora Gorge) | 1020 | 7 | 71 | 2 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 238 ± 36 | 652 ± 65 | 31 ± 8 | 12 ± 4 |
Land use summaries for year 2013.
Figure 2(A) The true diversity converted from Shannon-Wiener index (TD-SW) of bacterial communities at each SNRA site. (B) CART regression tree predicting TD-SW from independent variables given in Table 1.
Figure 3The taxonomic compositional structure of bacterial communities. (A) The correlations between STRAHLER stream order and the relative abundance of bacterial families. (B) The relative abundance of the top 20 most abundant bacterial families. The panel labels of the faceted plot represent sampling site IDs (first row) and STRAHLER stream order (second row). Only one sample was collected from each of the following two sites: SN_22 and SN_9.
Figure 4RDA of surface water bacterial community at SNRA based on (A) Hellinger-transformed OTUs, and (B) relative abundance of functional groups identified by FAPROTAX 1.0.
Figure 5(A) OTU richness in each functional group at the class level. The warmer color represents higher OTU numbers from a class contributed to a function. (B) The average relative abundance of chemoheterotrophic genera at each sampling site. The genera are grouped by the phyla they belong to. (C) The average relative abundance of OTUs belonging to methylotrophic bacteria.
Figure 6(A) The correlations between the relative abundance of 49 functional groups and the environmental/land use variables. Each circle represents the association between a selected variable and a particular functional group, with the size representing the strength of correlation (absolute value of spearman's rho), red color a negative correlation, and blue color a positive correlation. Solid dots show significant (p ≤ 0.05) correlation and circles indicate the correlation was not significant. (B) The variance of the compositional structure of each functional bacterial group explained by each environmental/land use variable. Each solid dot represents the community variance of a functional group explained by the variable, with blue color representing significant impact (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 7(A) A network showing similarity of the bacterial communities recovered at each sampling site. Each symbol represents one sample. Samples sharing more than 30% community similarity were connected by green edges and were placed closer to each other; the darker the edges, the higher the community resemblance. The overlaid circles are 50% confidence regions of ellipses of samples from each sampling site. (B) Ecological association networks of 97%-identity OTUs at SNRA, BH, and GR based on RMT-approach. The size of each node (OTU) is proportional to the degree (linked edges). The color of each node was determined by phylum. The green edges represent positive correlations between two nodes, while red edges represent negative correlations. The network plots are arranged by the proportion of agricultural land uses around the sampling watersheds.
Topological properties of molecular ecological networks (MENs) of microbial communities.
| Sample size | 7 | 71 | 30 | 28 | 13 | 16 | |
| Number of original OTUs | 82 | 471 | 271 | 174 | 148 | 158 | |
| Similarity threshold (Spearman's rho) | 0.31 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.76 | |
| Number of nodes | 70 | 91 | 103 | 101 | 103 | 95 | |
| Number of edges | 1247 | 396 | 629 | 255 | 297 | 268 | |
| R square of power-law | |||||||
| Power-law (free-scale) | – | 0.439 | 0.498 | 0.542 | 0.825 | 0.745 | |
| Truncated power-law (broad scale) | – | 0.343 | 0.013 | 0.824 | 0.723 | 0.796 | |
| Exponential (faster-decaying) | – | 0.544 | 0.542 | 0.786 | 0.844 | 0.819 | |
| Empirical | Modularity (no. of modules) | 0.091 (2) | 0.377 (5) | 0.256 (6) | 0.673 (9) | 0.532 (8) | 0.537 (6) |
| Average clustering coefficient (C) | 0.562 | 0.485 | 0.461 | 0.468 | 0.359 | 0.399 | |
| Harmonic geodesic distance (L) | 1.319 | 2.47 | 2.218 | 3.194 | 2.876 | 3.061 | |
| Random | Average modularity ± SD | 0.057 ± 0.025 | 0.233 ± 0.009 | 0.168 ± 0.005 | 0.381 ± 0.011 | 0.335 ± 0.009 | 0.333 ± 0.011 |
| Average clustering coefficient (Cr) ± SD | 0.522 ± 0.002 | 0.238 ± 0.020 | 0.367 ± 0.021 | 0.080 ± 0.016 | 0.111 ± 0.014 | 0.126 ± 0.018 | |
| Harmonic geodesic distance (Lr) ± SD | 1.319 ± 0.000 | 2.124 ± 0.014 | 2.019 ± 0.014 | 2.622 ± 0.026 | 2.487 ± 0.026 | 2.472 ± 0.028 | |