| Literature DB >> 30424083 |
Alireza Karbalaei1, Hyoung Jin Cho2.
Abstract
Taxis has been reported in many cells and microorganisms, due to their tendency to migrate toward favorable physical situations and avoid damage and death. Thermotaxis and chemotaxis are two of the major types of taxis that naturally occur on a daily basis. Understanding the details of the thermo- and chemotactic behavioral response of cells and microorganisms is necessary to reveal the body function, diagnosing diseases and developing therapeutic treatments. Considering the length-scale and range of effectiveness of these phenomena, advances in microfluidics have facilitated taxis experiments and enhanced the precision of controlling and capturing microscale samples. Microfabrication of fluidic chips could bridge the gap between in vitro and in situ biological assays, specifically in taxis experiments. Numerous efforts have been made to develop, fabricate and implement novel microchips to conduct taxis experiments and increase the accuracy of the results. The concepts originated from thermo- and chemotaxis, inspired novel ideas applicable to microfluidics as well, more specifically, thermocapillarity and chemocapillarity (or solutocapillarity) for the manipulation of single- and multi-phase fluid flows in microscale and fluidic control elements such as valves, pumps, mixers, traps, etc. This paper starts with a brief biological overview of the concept of thermo- and chemotaxis followed by the most recent developments in microchips used for thermo- and chemotaxis experiments. The last section of this review focuses on the microfluidic devices inspired by the concept of thermo- and chemotaxis. Various microfluidic devices that have either been used for, or inspired by thermo- and chemotaxis are reviewed categorically.Entities:
Keywords: bio-inspired; chemocapillary; chemotaxis; microfluidic; microorganism; taxis; thermocapillary; thermotaxis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30424083 PMCID: PMC6187570 DOI: 10.3390/mi9040149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1(A) Schematic 3D picture of a sperm (Photo Credit: iStockphoto, modified). (B) Different parts of a sperm (Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.). (C) DIC Nomarski image (collage of multiple shots) of C. elegans N2 (wildtype) adult hermaphrodite (© Ian D. Chin-Sang, 2017). (D) Different parts of a C. elegans (photo credit is given to BodyFIG1B, and the name of the organs are from the work by Kaletta and Hengarter [17]). (E) Schematic 3D picture of the bacterium called Escherichia coli or E. coli (Photo Credit: 3DOcean, modified). (F) Different parts of an E. coli (Photo Credit: emaze.com).
Figure 2Sperm guidance mechanism in mammalian female genital tract, which shows the relative range of action of thermotaxis and chemotaxis. Reprinted from [18].
Figure 3Using the counterflow heat exchanger concept at the microscale for the generation of a constant temperature gradient across a microchannel for thermotaxis experiments on-chip. Reproduced from [79].
Figure 4Microfluidic device along with the experimental apparatus used by Li et al. to perform sperm thermotaxis. The device is comprised of two inlets, one for sperm samples and the other for air. Adjusting the air pressure can stop the swimming of sperm toward collection reservoirs N1 and N2 by the help of microposts. The parts in the experimental apparatus are: A, syringe pump; B, digital temperature controller; C, temperature gradient generator; D, inverted microscope. Different sections of the microfluidic device are: 1, glycerol; 2, aluminum alloy tank; 3, resistive heater; 4, thermistor; 5, microfluidic channel; 6, PDMS upper layer; 7, glass lower layer; 8, chip positioning chamber; 9, PMMA case. Reproduced from [80].
Figure 5Microfluidic chip enhanced with fluidic tweezers fabricated by McCormick et al. used for thermotaxis analysis of C. elegans. Reprinted with permission from [81].
Figure 6A microfluidic chip developed by Murugesan et al., which combines thermal and chemical gradients in a single chip to perform both thermotaxis and chemotaxis on E. coli bacteria at the same time. Reproduced from [16].
Figure 7Microfluidic device fabricated by Ko et al. for chemotaxis on mouse sperm. Each of the circumferential reservoirs is filled with a sperm chemoeffector, and semen is injected in the center of the chip. Reprinted with permission from [84].
Figure 8Picture on the left (© Lumen—Boundless Anatomy and Physiology) shows a schematic of the actual female reproductive system, while on the right is a microfluidic device concept in which two inlets are considered as the ovaries connected to the observation chamber (uterus) by microchannels (fallopian tubes) with an inlet at the bottom with which sperm samples are injected. The device is appropriate for the chemotaxis of sperm.
Figure 9Schematic PDMS-glass microfluidic device and the experimental apparatus for sperm chemotaxis. Reprinted with permission from [86].
Figure 10A sample platform for the chemotaxis study of C. elegans. In this study, the nematode is fixed by a vacuum, while its chemotactic response to different chemoattractants is analyzed. Reprinted from [77].
Figure 11This schematic picture shows that cells and microorganisms can be trapped inside a moving droplet for biological experiments such as different types of taxis. Reproduced from [15].
Figure 12Microfluidic device developed by Chronis and his group for single-organism qualitative study of the chemotactic response of C. elegans. The device consists of inlets, one for the chemoeffector, one for the buffer and two side ones for dye. The device structure, the schematics of its functionality, as well as the orienting chemotactic response of the worm are shown in this figure. Reprinted by permission from [87,88].
Figure 13A microfluidic device developed for chemotaxis on C. elegans. In this device, the chemical gradient is generated by using serpentine channels. In this device, dirt and colloids inside soil are modeled with an array of microposts in the observation chamber. The idea is adopted from the microfluidic device developed by Hwang et al. [89].
Figure 14Microfluidic platform for chemotaxis of a nematode called Meloidogyne incognita or M. incognita. In this design, the experiment chambers are separated from the main inlets by barriers, which act like one-way valves. Reproduced with permission from [91].
Figure 15Schematics of a microfluidic device developed by Mao et al. for chemotaxis of E. coli. Inlet configurations induce a chemical concentration gradient across the channel and lead the bacteria to move toward the upper outlets, generating a spectral concentration of bacteria in the outlet channels. Reprinted with permission from [93].
Figure 16Schematic of the microfluidic device fabricated by Nagy et al. to perform chemotaxis experiments on E. coli. The lower level of the device consists of two separate reservoirs for the chemoeffector and the buffer, while on the upper level, the bacteria inlet and outlet are connected by a straight observation channel. The reservoirs have overlaps with the sides of the observation channel and are separated from it by an aluminum-oxide membrane. Depending on the pore size of the membrane, the chemical and the buffer are fed to opposite sides of the observation channel, generating a uniform chemical concentration gradient across the observation channel. The exact behavior of the batch of bacteria toward this concentration gradient is analyzed. Reproduced from [94].
Figure 17PDMS microfluidic chip for the chemotaxis study of marine microbials. Drops are placed on each port on top of separate reservoirs filled with different chemoeffectors and the amount of microbials attracted by chemicals and entering the reservoirs is measured. Reprinted with permission from [95].
Figure 18Microfluidic device for the chemotaxis of cancer cells and the simulation of lymphatic capillary geometry. The device consists of choke points with variations of widths from 6 μm (narrowest) to 30 μm (no choke point). Migration behavior of MDA-MB-231 cells through the choke points is analyzed. The differences of the migration patterns between scrambled control (SCR) cells and the p38γ knockdown (GKD) cells (** refers to p < 0.01). Reprinted with permission from [96].
Figure 19Multi-layer paper-based microfluidic device developed by Mosadegh et al. for chemotaxis of A549 cancer cells. Reprinted from [97].
Figure 20Migration of binary drops on a solid substrate by inducing thermocapillarity (analogous to thermotaxis). Reproduced from [117].
Figure 21(A) Interplay of the Marangoni effect and gravity for the manipulation of levitated droplets on a carrier liquid using an indirect heat source. The idea was adopted [146]. (B) Introducing the concept of levitated droplets by Savino et al. Reproduced with permission of [147].
Figure 22Analysis of the dual stable state of a droplet on an immiscible liquid film and its different response to heat sources inspired by positive and negative thermotaxis. Reprinted with permission from [150,153].
Figure 23Chemotactic manipulation of water droplets encapsulated with crystals, cells and colloids in squalane oil with monoolein surfactant. Reprinted figure with permission from [163].
Figure 24Self-propulsion microfluidic system inspired by chemotaxis for the manipulation of marbles on water. The left figure shows a marble filled with camphor, and the right figure shows a sample physical configuration of the problem. Reprinted with permission from [165]. The middle figure shows a moving marble containing 70% ethanol. Reprinted with permission from [166].
Categories of microfluidic devices used for or inspired by thermo- and chemotaxis. HGF, hepatocyte growth factor.
| Object for Manipulation | Gradient Generation Method (Specsifications) | Application/Year/Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfluidics Used for Taxis | Thermotaxis | Nematodes | Liquid Convection | Single-Cell ASH Neuron Stimulation, 2011 [ |
| Sperm | Metal Sheet Conduction | High-Throughput Motility, 2014 [ | ||
| Bacteria | Heat Exchanger | High-Throughput Migration, 2017 [ | ||
| Heat Exchanger | High-Throughput Congregation, 2012 [ | |||
| Heat Exchanger | High-Throughput Migration with Au nanoparticles, 2016 [ | |||
| Cancer Cells | Heat Exchanger | High-Throughput Viability/Activity Screening, 2008 [ | ||
| Chemotaxis | Nematodes | Diffusion | Single-Cell ASER Neuron Stimulation, 2011 [ | |
| Diffusion | Single-Cell ASH Neuron Stimulation, 2011 [ | |||
| Diffusion | Single-Cell AVA and ASH Neurons Stimulation, 2007 [ | |||
| Diffusion | Single-Cell AWC, AIB and AIY Neurons Stimulation, 2007 [ | |||
| Diffusion (Glycerol) | Single-Cell ASH Neurons Stimulation, 2010 [ | |||
| Enhanced Diffusion | High-Throughput Migration, 2015 [ | |||
| Nematodes | Diffusion | High-Throughput Migration, 2017 [ | ||
| Nematodes | Diffusion (KNO3) | High-Throughput Migration, 2015 [ | ||
| Sperm | Diffusion | High-Throughput Motility vs. Concentration, 2012 [ | ||
| Diffusion | High-Throughput In Vitro Fertilization, 2010 [ | |||
| Diffusion | High-Throughput Motility, 2006 [ | |||
| Bacteria | Diffusion | High-Throughput Migration, 2017 [ | ||
| Diffusion (Aspartate, Serine, Leucine, Ni2+) | High-Throughput Migration, 2003 [ | |||
| Diffusion | High-Throughput Migration and Quorum Sensing with | |||
| Bacteria | Diffusion (Marine Broth, Methylaspartate) | High-Throughput Migration, 2017 [ | ||
| Cancer Cells | Diffusion (HGF) | Single-Cell Migration through Lymphatic Capillaries, 2015 [ | ||
| Cancer Cells (A549) | Diffusion (Oxygen) | High-Throughput Paper-based Migration, 2015 [ | ||
| Microfluidics Inspired by Taxis | Thermotaxis-Inspired Microfluidics | Liquid on Solid | Embedded | Thermocapillary Migration of Binary Drops, 2011 [ |
| Thermocapillary Router, Mixer and Valve, 2003 and 2010 [ | ||||
| Thermocapillary Droplet Migration, 2008 [ | ||||
| Thermocapillary Droplet Pumping, 1999 [ | ||||
| Droplet-based Microcapacitor, 2004 [ | ||||
| Droplet-based Micromirror, 2009 [ | ||||
| Liquid in Liquid | Embedded | Thermocapillary Droplet Migration, 2009 and 2010 [ | ||
| Remote | Droplet Switching, Sorting, Mixing, Merging and Splitting, 2007–2009 [ | |||
| Liquid on Liquid | Embedded | Droplet Storing, Routing, Trapping and Mixing, 2008 [ | ||
| Chemotaxis-Inspired Microfluidics | Substrate Surface Modification | Silanization | Fast Drop Migration on Modified Si Substrate, 2001 [ | |
| Liquid-Liquid Manipulation | Surfactant | Migration of Carrier Water Droplets, 2014 [ | ||
| PH Alteration | Self-propelled Capsules as Pollutant Sense-And-Act, 2014 [ | |||
| Gradual Release | Self-propelled Liquid Marbles on Thin Films, 2015 & 2017 [ | |||
| PH Gradient | Migration of Dye Particles in Maze, 2014 [ |