Literature DB >> 30423778

The design of additively manufactured lattices to increase the functionality of medical implants.

Hanna E Burton1, Neil M Eisenstein2, Bernard M Lawless3, Parastoo Jamshidi4, Miren A Segarra4, Owen Addison5, Duncan E T Shepherd3, Moataz M Attallah4, Liam M Grover6, Sophie C Cox6.   

Abstract

The rise of antibiotic resistant bacterial species is driving the requirement for medical devices that minimise infection risks. Antimicrobial functionality may be achieved by modifying the implant design to incorporate a reservoir that locally releases a therapeutic. For this approach to be successful it is critical that mechanical functionality of the implant is maintained. This study explores the opportunity to exploit the design flexibilities possible using additive manufacturing to develop porous lattices that maximise the volume available for drug loading while maintaining load-bearing capacity of a hip implant. Eight unit cell types were initially investigated and a volume fraction of 30% was identified as the lowest level at which all lattices met the design criteria in ISO 13314. Finite element analysis (FEA) identified three lattice types that exhibited significantly lower displacement (10-fold) compared with other designs; Schwartz primitive, Schwartz primitive pinched and cylinder grid. These lattices were additively manufactured in Ti-6Al-4V using selective laser melting. Each design exceeded the minimum strength requirements for orthopaedic hip implants according to ISO 7206-4. The Schwartz primitive (Pinched) lattice geometry, with 10% volume fill and a cubic unit cell period of 10, allowed the greatest void volume of all lattice designs whilst meeting the fatigue requirements for use in an orthopaedic implant (ISO 7206-4). This paper demonstrates an example of how additive manufacture may be exploited to add additional functionality to medical implants.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacture; Drug delivery; Finite element analysis; Lattice; Mechanical testing; Therapeutics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30423778     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  7 in total

Review 1.  Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi; Masoud Zhianmanesh; Osezua Ibhadode; Shahriar Imani Shahabad; Reza Esmaeilizadeh; Einollah Sarikhani; Sahar Toorandaz; Shima A Sarabi; Rohollah Nasiri; Yangzhi Zhu; Javad Kadkhodapour; Bingbing Li; Ali Khademhosseini; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-30

2.  Fabrication and Optimisation of Ti-6Al-4V Lattice-Structured Total Shoulder Implants Using Laser Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Oliver Bittredge; Hany Hassanin; Mahmoud Ahmed El-Sayed; Hossam Mohamed Eldessouky; Naser A Alsaleh; Nashmi H Alrasheedi; Khamis Essa; Mahmoud Ahmadein
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Physical-Mechanical Characteristics and Microstructure of Ti6Al7Nb Lattice Structures Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting.

Authors:  Cosmin Cosma; Igor Drstvensek; Petru Berce; Simon Prunean; Stanisław Legutko; Catalin Popa; Nicolae Balc
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Topology Optimisation for Compliant Hip Implant Design and Reduced Strain Shielding.

Authors:  Nathanael Tan; Richard J van Arkel
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Microstructural Evolution, Mechanical Properties, and Preosteoblast Cell Response of a Post-Processing-Treated TNT5Zr β Ti Alloy Manufactured via Selective Laser Melting.

Authors:  Weihuan Kong; Sophie C Cox; Yu Lu; Victor Villapun; Xiaoling Xiao; Wenyou Ma; Min Liu; Moataz M Attallah
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2022-05-10

6.  Surface Free Energy Dominates the Biological Interactions of Postprocessed Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Villapun Puzas; Luke N Carter; Christian Schröder; Paula E Colavita; David A Hoey; Mark A Webber; Owen Addison; Duncan E T Shepherd; Moataz M Attallah; Liam M Grover; Sophie C Cox
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  3D Printed Polyurethane Scaffolds for the Repair of Bone Defects.

Authors:  Megan E Cooke; Jose L Ramirez-GarciaLuna; Karla Rangel-Berridi; Hyeree Park; Showan N Nazhat; Michael H Weber; Janet E Henderson; Derek H Rosenzweig
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.