Christopher A Penfold1,2, Anastasiya Sybirna1,3,4, John E Reid5,6, Yun Huang1,4, Lorenz Wernisch5, Zoubin Ghahramani7, Murray Grant8, M Azim Surani1,2,3. 1. Wellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge, UK. 2. Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. 3. Wellcome/MRC Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK. 4. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. 5. MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. 6. The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK. 7. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 8. School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abstract
Motivation: A common class of behaviour encountered in the biological sciences involves branching and recombination. During branching, a statistical process bifurcates resulting in two or more potentially correlated processes that may undergo further branching; the contrary is true during recombination, where two or more statistical processes converge. A key objective is to identify the time of this bifurcation (branch or recombination time) from time series measurements, e.g. by comparing a control time series with perturbed time series. Gaussian processes (GPs) represent an ideal framework for such analysis, allowing for nonlinear regression that includes a rigorous treatment of uncertainty. Currently, however, GP models only exist for two-branch systems. Here, we highlight how arbitrarily complex branching processes can be built using the correct composition of covariance functions within a GP framework, thus outlining a general framework for the treatment of branching and recombination in the form of branch-recombinant Gaussian processes (B-RGPs). Results: We first benchmark the performance of B-RGPs compared to a variety of existing regression approaches, and demonstrate robustness to model misspecification. B-RGPs are then used to investigate the branching patterns of Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression following inoculation with the hemibotrophic bacteria, Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, and a disarmed mutant strain, hrpA. By grouping genes according to the number of branches, we could naturally separate out genes involved in basal immune response from those subverted by the virulent strain, and show enrichment for targets of pathogen protein effectors. Finally, we identify two early branching genes WRKY11 and WRKY17, and show that genes that branched at similar times to WRKY11/17 were enriched for W-box binding motifs, and overrepresented for genes differentially expressed in WRKY11/17 knockouts, suggesting that branch time could be used for identifying direct and indirect binding targets of key transcription factors. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/cap76/BranchingGPs. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Motivation: A common class of behaviour encountered in the biological sciences involves branching and recombination. During branching, a statistical process bifurcates resulting in two or more potentially correlated processes that may undergo further branching; the contrary is true during recombination, where two or more statistical processes converge. A key objective is to identify the time of this bifurcation (branch or recombination time) from time series measurements, e.g. by comparing a control time series with perturbed time series. Gaussian processes (GPs) represent an ideal framework for such analysis, allowing for nonlinear regression that includes a rigorous treatment of uncertainty. Currently, however, GP models only exist for two-branch systems. Here, we highlight how arbitrarily complex branching processes can be built using the correct composition of covariance functions within a GP framework, thus outlining a general framework for the treatment of branching and recombination in the form of branch-recombinant Gaussian processes (B-RGPs). Results: We first benchmark the performance of B-RGPs compared to a variety of existing regression approaches, and demonstrate robustness to model misspecification. B-RGPs are then used to investigate the branching patterns of Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression following inoculation with the hemibotrophic bacteria, Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, and a disarmed mutant strain, hrpA. By grouping genes according to the number of branches, we could naturally separate out genes involved in basal immune response from those subverted by the virulent strain, and show enrichment for targets of pathogen protein effectors. Finally, we identify two early branching genes WRKY11 and WRKY17, and show that genes that branched at similar times to WRKY11/17 were enriched for W-box binding motifs, and overrepresented for genes differentially expressed in WRKY11/17 knockouts, suggesting that branch time could be used for identifying direct and indirect binding targets of key transcription factors. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/cap76/BranchingGPs. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Sean C Bendall; Kara L Davis; El-Ad David Amir; Michelle D Tadmor; Erin F Simonds; Tiffany J Chen; Daniel K Shenfeld; Garry P Nolan; Dana Pe'er Journal: Cell Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Eugenio Marco; Robert L Karp; Guoji Guo; Paul Robson; Adam H Hart; Lorenzo Trippa; Guo-Cheng Yuan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Shahid Mukhtar; Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis; Matija Dreze; Petra Epple; Jens Steinbrenner; Jonathan Moore; Murat Tasan; Mary Galli; Tong Hao; Marc T Nishimura; Samuel J Pevzner; Susan E Donovan; Lila Ghamsari; Balaji Santhanam; Viviana Romero; Matthew M Poulin; Fana Gebreab; Bryan J Gutierrez; Stanley Tam; Dario Monachello; Mike Boxem; Christopher J Harbort; Nathan McDonald; Lantian Gai; Huaming Chen; Yijian He; Jean Vandenhaute; Frederick P Roth; David E Hill; Joseph R Ecker; Marc Vidal; Jim Beynon; Pascal Braun; Jeffery L Dangl Journal: Science Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 47.728