Literature DB >> 30421852

Relationships among tongue volume, hyoid position, airway volume and maxillofacial form in paediatric patients with Class-I, Class-II and Class-III malocclusions.

Tomonori Iwasaki1, Hokuto Suga1, Ayaka Yanagisawa-Minami1, Hideo Sato1, Makiko Sato-Hashiguchi1, Yoshito Shirazawa1, Toshiya Tsujii1, Yuushi Yamamoto1, Ryuzo Kanomi2, Youichi Yamasaki1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the associations among tongue volume, hyoid position, airway volume and maxillofacial form using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data for children with Class-I, Class-II and Class-III malocclusion. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Sixty children (mean age, 9.2 years) divided into Class-I, Class-II and Class-III malocclusion groups according to the A-nasion-B angle.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography was used for three-dimensional reconstruction of the maxillofacial region and airway. The hyoid position and the tongue, airway and oral cavity volumes were evaluated. Upper airway ventilation status was calculated using computational fluid dynamics. The groups were compared using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests; relationships among the parameters were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's rank correlation tests.
RESULTS: The tongue volume was larger in Class-III patients (50.63 cm3 ) than in Class-I patients (44.24 cm3 ; P < 0.05). The hyoid position was lower (49.44 cm), and anatomical balance (AB; tongue volume/oral cavity volume; 85.06%) was greater in Class-II patients than in Class-I patients (46.06 cm, 80.57%, respectively; P < 0.05 for both). The hyoid height showed a positive correlation with AB (r = 0.614; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Children with Class-III malocclusion have large tongue volumes and small AB; the reverse is true for children with Class-II malocclusion. The hyoid position is closely associated with AB in children with malocclusion.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway volume; anatomical balance; hyoid position; malocclusion; tongue volume

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30421852     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

1.  Screening of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk in adolescent population and study of association with craniofacial and upper airway morphology.

Authors:  Lubna Ahmad; Priyanka Kapoor; Sejal Bhaskar; Himani Khatter
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-10-15

2.  Three-dimensional evaluation of hyoid bone position in nasal and mouth breathing subjects with skeletal Class I, and Class II.

Authors:  Amin S Mohamed; Janvier Habumugisha; Bo Cheng; Minyue Zhao; Yucheng Guo; Rui Zou; Fei Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Head position classification of medical imaging studies: an assessment and development of a protocol.

Authors:  Courtney A Miller; Yen Lee; Gregory D Avey; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Differences in the factors associated with tongue pressure between children with class I and Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  Yuko Fujita; Yoma Ohno; Keitaro Ohno; Tomohiro Takeshima; Kenshi Maki
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Oropharynx and hyoid bone changes in female extraction patients with distinct sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Runzhi Guo; Shuo Wang; Liwen Zhang; Linwei Li; Qianyao Yu; Yiping Huang; Weiran Li
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.