Literature DB >> 30421343

Time-lapse imaging reveals delayed development of embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations.

Hadar Amir1, Shiri Barbash-Hazan1, Yael Kalma1, Tsvia Frumkin1, Mira Malcov1, Nivin Samara1, Joseph Hasson1, Adi Reches1, Foad Azem1, Dalit Ben-Yosef2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the morphokinetic parameters of embryos carrying balanced chromosomal translocations with those carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations using time-lapse microscopy.
METHODS: The study group included 270 embryos that underwent biopsies on day 3 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for chromosomal translocations in our unit between 2013 and 2015. All embryos were incubated under time-lapse microscopy and evaluated for timing of developmental events up to day 5. The timing of these events was compared between balanced and unbalanced embryos, potentially viable and nonviable variants, and maternal versus paternal inheritance of the translocation.
RESULTS: The PGD analysis found that 209 (77%) of the 270 biopsied embryos carried an unbalanced translocation. Embryos carrying unbalanced translocations, which are expected to lead to implantation failure or miscarriage, cleaved less synchronously and were delayed in time of cleavage to the 4-cell stage (t4) and in time of start of blastulation (tSB) compared with balanced embryos (P < 0.05). Furthermore, embryos carrying nonviable translocations demonstrated a significant delay at the time of pronuclei fading (tPNf) compared with those carrying potentially viable translocations (P < 0.05). Embryos whose unbalanced translocations were of maternal origin were significantly delayed in most of the morphokinetic parameters (including tPNf, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, cc2, s2, and tSB) compared with embryos carrying balanced translocations (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations mainly of maternal origin undergo delayed development and asynchronous cleavage that may lead to implantation failure or miscarriage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal translocations; Morphokinetic parameters; Preimplantation development; Time-lapse imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30421343      PMCID: PMC6420524          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1361-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  7 in total

1.  Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR).

Authors:  E Mateu-Brull; L Rodrigo; V Peinado; A Mercader; I Campos-Galindo; F Bronet; S García-Herrero; M Florensa; M Milán; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nakano; Michiko Ammae; Manabu Satoh; Satoshi Mizuno; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype.

Authors:  Gang Li; Weiyi Shi; Wenbin Niu; Jiawei Xu; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  The Relationship between Human Embryo Parameters and De Novo Chromosomal Abnormalities in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles.

Authors:  Yanli Liu; Junhan Shen; Rujing Yang; Yuchao Zhang; Liting Jia; Yichun Guan
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.257

5.  Sperm selection with hyaluronic acid improved live birth outcomes among older couples and was connected to sperm DNA quality, potentially affecting all treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Robert West; Arri Coomarasamy; Lorraine Frew; Rachel Hutton; Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Martin Lawlor; Sheena Lewis; Riitta Partanen; Alex Payne-Dwyer; Claudia Román-Montañana; Forough Torabi; Sofia Tsagdi; David Miller
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.353

Review 6.  Time-Lapse Embryo culture: A better understanding of embryo development and clinical application.

Authors:  Silvana Márquez-Hinojosa; Luis Noriega-Hoces; Luis Guzmán
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-08-04

7.  Oocytes With Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum Aggregates May Not Impact Blastocyst Euploidy Rate.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Li Yang; Zhi-Heng Chen; Min-Na Yin; Juan Chen; Ling Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.055

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.