Literature DB >> 30421078

Emergency laparoscopic and open repair of incarcerated ventral hernias: a multi-institutional comparative analysis with coarsened exact matching.

Arash Azin1, Dhruvin Hirpara1, Timothy Jackson1,2, Allan Okrainec1,2, Ahmad Elnahas1,2, Sami A Chadi1,2, Fayez A Quereshy3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety of emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernias is not well established. The objective of this study was to determine if emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernias is comparable to open repair with respect to short-term clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Patients undergoing emergency repair of an incarcerated ventral hernia with associated obstruction and/or gangrene were identified using the ACS-NSQIP 2012-2016 dataset. One-to-one coarsened exact matching (CEM) was conducted between patients undergoing laparoscopic and open repair. Matched cohorts were compared with respect to morbidity, mortality, readmission, reoperation, missed enterotomies, and length of stay. Missed enterotomy was defined as any re-operative procedure within 30 days that required resection of large or small bowel segments, based on CPT codes. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine adjusted predictors of morbidity.
RESULTS: A total of 1642 patients were identified after CEM. Laparoscopic compared to open repair was associated with a lower rate of 30-day wound-morbidity (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22-0.57, p < 0.001). Laparoscopic repair was not associated with lower 30-day non-wound morbidity (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.51-1.06, p = 0.094). Laparoscopic repair was associated with shorter LOS (3.6 days vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.014). A higher rate of missed enterotomies was observed in the laparoscopic cohort (0.7% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.031). There were no group differences with respect to 30-day readmission, reoperation, or mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernias is associated with lower rates of wound-morbidity and shorter hospital stays compared to open repair. However, laparoscopic repair is associated with a higher rate of missed enterotomies; a rate which is low and comparable to elective non-incarcerated ventral hernia repairs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency surgery; Incarceration; Incisional hernia; Laparoscopy; Obstruction; Ventral hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30421078     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6573-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh.

Authors:  S S Forbes; C Eskicioglu; R S McLeod; A Okrainec
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Choi; Nandini C Palaniappa; Kai B Dallas; Tamara B Rudich; Modesto J Colon; Celia M Divino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kamal M F Itani; Kwan Hur; Lawrence T Kim; Thomas Anthony; David H Berger; Domenic Reda; Leigh Neumayer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mylan T Nguyen; Rachel L Berger; Stephanie C Hicks; Jessica A Davila; Linda T Li; Lillian S Kao; Mike K Liang
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  The safety and efficacy of prosthetic hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds.

Authors:  Michael E Kelly; Stephen W Behrman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  The chosen few: disproportionate resource use in ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Benjamin K Poulose; William C Beck; Sharon E Phillips; Kenneth W Sharp; William H Nealon; Michael D Holzman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hasan H Eker; Bibi M E Hansson; Mark Buunen; Ignace M C Janssen; Robert E G J M Pierik; Wim C Hop; H Jaap Bonjer; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Is laparoscopic repair of incarcerated abdominal hernias safe? Analysis of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Elnahas; Song Hon H Kim; Allan Okrainec; Fayez Quereshy; Timothy D Jackson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated incisional and ventral hernia.

Authors:  O Landau; S Kyzer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Enterotomy and mortality rates of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Karl Andrew LeBlanc; Melvin Joseph Elieson; James M Corder
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Complications following regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for the treatment of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Ryan Lee; Danny Lee; Pradip Ramamurti; Safa Fassihi; Jessica H Heyer; Monica Stadecker; Michael Webber; Alice Hughes; Rajeev Pandarinath
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Outcomes of obstructed abdominal wall hernia: results from the UK national small bowel obstruction audit.

Authors: 
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-07-10

Review 3.  Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Brij Madhok; Kushan Nanayakkara; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-01-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.