Literature DB >> 23552714

Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.

Hasan H Eker1, Bibi M E Hansson, Mark Buunen, Ignace M C Janssen, Robert E G J M Pierik, Wim C Hop, H Jaap Bonjer, Johannes Jeekel, Johan F Lange.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Incisional hernia is the most frequent surgical complication after laparotomy. Up to 30% of all patients undergoing laparotomy develop an incisional hernia.
OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic vs open ventral incisional hernia repair with regard to postoperative pain and nausea, operative results, perioperative and postoperative complications, hospital admission, and recurrence rate.
DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial between May 1999 and December 2006 with a mean follow-up period of 35 months.
SETTING: All patients were operated on in a clinical setting at 1 of the 2 participating university medical centers or at the other 8 teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred six patients from 10 hospitals were randomized equally to laparoscopic or open mesh repair. Patients with an incisional hernia larger than 3 cm and smaller than 15 cm, either primary or recurrent, were included. Patients were excluded if they had an open abdomen treatment in their medical histories. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic or open ventral incisional hernia repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the trial was postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were use of analgesics, perioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, postoperative nausea, length of hospital stay, recurrence, morbidity, and mortality.
RESULTS: Median blood loss during the operation was significantly less (10 mL vs 50 mL; P = .05) as well as the number of patients receiving a wound drain (3% vs. 45%; P < .001) in the laparoscopic group. Operative time for the laparoscopic group was longer (100 minutes vs. 76 minutes; P = .001). Perioperative complications were significantly higher after laparoscopy (9% vs. 2%). Visual analog scale scores for pain and nausea, completed before surgery and 3 days and 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. At a mean follow-up period of 35 months, a recurrence rate of 14% was reported in the open group and 18%, in the laparoscopic group (P = .30). The size of the defect was found to be an independent predictor for recurrence (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: During the operation, there was less blood loss and less need for a wound drain in the laparoscopic group. However, operative time was longer during laparoscopy. Perioperative complications were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. Visual analog scores for pain and nausea did not differ between groups. The incidence of a recurrence was similar in both groups. The size of the defect was found to be an independent factor for recurrence of an incisional hernia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552714     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  51 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomized multicenter study of 1-month follow-up results.

Authors:  M Ahonen-Siirtola; T Nevala; J Vironen; J Kössi; T Pinta; S Niemeläinen; U Keränen; J Ward; P Vento; J Karvonen; P Ohtonen; J Mäkelä; T Rautio
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed.

Authors:  Samuel G Parker; C P J Wood; J W Butterworth; R W Boulton; A A O Plumb; S Mallett; S Halligan; A C J Windsor
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  [Indications for laparoscopic treatment of large incisional hernias].

Authors:  U A Dietz; A Wiegering; C-T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Watchful waiting vs surgical repair of oligosymptomatic incisional hernias: Current status of the AWARE study].

Authors:  J C Lauscher; M Leonhardt; P Martus; G Zur Hausen; K Aschenbrenner; U Zurbuchen; H Thielemann; T Kohlert; R Schirren; T Simon; H J Buhr; J-P Ritz; M E Kreis
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Anthony Gonzalez; Ernesto Escobar; Rey Romero; Gail Walker; Jacqueline Mejias; Michelle Gallas; Eugene Dickens; Christopher J Johnson; Jorge Rabaza; Omar Yusef Kudsi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  [Recurrence after hernia surgery: complication or natural course?].

Authors:  A Kohler; G Beldi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanyan Zhang; Haiyang Zhou; Yunsheng Chai; Can Cao; Kaizhou Jin; Zhiqian Hu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Surgical site occurrences, not body mass index, increase the long-term risk of ventral hernia recurrence.

Authors:  Joshua S Jolissaint; Bryan V Dieffenbach; Thomas C Tsai; Luise I Pernar; Brent T Shoji; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria.

Authors:  U A Dietz; A Fleischhacker; S Menzel; U Klinge; C Jurowich; K Haas; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer; A Wiegering
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.