Literature DB >> 25943888

Glioblastoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers.

Kenneth Aldape1, Gelareh Zadeh, Sheila Mansouri, Guido Reifenberger, Andreas von Deimling.   

Abstract

Recent advances in genomic technology have led to a better understanding of key molecular alterations that underlie glioblastoma (GBM). The current WHO-based classification of GBM is mainly based on histologic features of the tumor, which frequently do not reflect the molecular differences that describe the diversity in the biology of these lesions. The current WHO definition of GBM relies on the presence of high-grade astrocytic neoplasm with the presence of either microvascular proliferation and/or tumor necrosis. High-throughput analyses have identified molecular subtypes and have led to progress in more accurate classification of GBM. These findings, in turn, would result in development of more effective patient stratification, targeted therapeutics, and prediction of patient outcome. While consensus has not been reached on the precise nature and means to sub-classify GBM, it is clear that IDH-mutant GBMs are clearly distinct from GBMs without IDH1/2 mutation with respect to molecular and clinical features, including prognosis. In addition, recent findings in pediatric GBMs regarding mutations in the histone H3F3A gene suggest that these tumors may represent a 3rd major category of GBM, separate from adult primary (IDH1/2 wt), and secondary (IDH1/2 mut) GBMs. In this review, we describe major clinically relevant genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in GBM-such as mutations in IDH1/2, EGFR, PDGFRA, and NF1 genes-altered methylation of MGMT gene promoter, and mutations in hTERT promoter. These markers may be incorporated into a more refined classification system and applied in more accurate clinical decision-making process. In addition, we focus on current understanding of the biologic heterogeneity and classification of GBM and highlight some of the molecular signatures and alterations that characterize GBMs as histologically defined. We raise the question whether IDH-wild type high grade astrocytomas without microvascular proliferation or necrosis might best be classified as GBM, even if they lack the histologic hallmarks as required in the current WHO classification. Alternatively, an astrocytic tumor that fits the current histologic definition of GBM, but which shows an IDH mutation may in fact be better classified as a distinct entity, given that IDH-mutant GBM are quite distinct from a biological and clinical perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25943888     DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1432-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


  213 in total

1.  REST represses miR-124 and miR-203 to regulate distinct oncogenic properties of glioblastoma stem cells.

Authors:  Anantha L Marisetty; Sanjay K Singh; Tran N Nguyen; Cristian Coarfa; Bin Liu; Sadhan Majumder
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Glioblastoma single extracellular vesicle analysis profiles: wading into new oceans of tumor data.

Authors:  Jennifer Jones
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Circular RNA-encoded oncogenic E-cadherin variant promotes glioblastoma tumorigenicity through activation of EGFR-STAT3 signalling.

Authors:  Xinya Gao; Xin Xia; Fanying Li; Maolei Zhang; Huangkai Zhou; Xujia Wu; Jian Zhong; Zheng Zhao; Kun Zhao; Dawei Liu; Feizhe Xiao; Qiang Xu; Tao Jiang; Bo Li; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Nu Zhang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Aging-related tumor associated fibroblasts changes could worsen the prognosis of GBM patients.

Authors:  Hongwang Song; Xiaojun Fu; Chenxing Wu; Shouwei Li
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  MiR-181b modulates chemosensitivity of glioblastoma multiforme cells to temozolomide by targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Yunxiang Chen; Rui Li; Minhong Pan; Zhumei Shi; Wei Yan; Ning Liu; Yongping You; Junxia Zhang; Xiefeng Wang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Transforming growth factor-β and stem cell markers are highly expressed around necrotic areas in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yasuo Iwadate; Tomoo Matsutani; Seiichiro Hirono; Natsuki Shinozaki; Naokatsu Saeki
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Label-Free Neurosurgical Pathology with Stimulated Raman Imaging.

Authors:  Fa-Ke Lu; David Calligaris; Olutayo I Olubiyi; Isaiah Norton; Wenlong Yang; Sandro Santagata; X Sunney Xie; Alexandra J Golby; Nathalie Y R Agar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: new insights.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pelosi; Angelica Sonzogni; Sergio Harari; Adriana Albini; Enrica Bresaola; Caterina Marchiò; Federica Massa; Luisella Righi; Gaia Gatti; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Namrata Vijayvergia; Fiorella Calabrese; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10

9.  Identification of a novel metabolic-related mutation (IDH1) in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brody; Cinthya S Yabar; Mahsa Zarei; Joseph Bender; Lynn M Matrisian; Lola Rahib; Craig Heartwell; Kimberly Mason; Charles J Yeo; Stephen C Peiper; Wei Jiang; Katelyn Varieur; Subha Madhavan; Emanuel Petricoin; Danielle Fortuna; Mark Curtis; Zi-Xuan Wang; Michael J Pishvaian; Jordan M Winter
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  Genetic, epigenetic, and molecular landscapes of multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma.

Authors:  Qun Liu; Yuexin Liu; Wenliang Li; Xiaoguang Wang; Raymond Sawaya; Frederick F Lang; W K Alfred Yung; Kexin Chen; Gregory N Fuller; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 17.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.