| Literature DB >> 30420895 |
Young Ju Jeong1, Min Ah Kwak2, Jung Chul Seo3, Seong Hoon Park3, Jin Gu Bong4, Im Hee Shin5, Sung Hwan Park1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Some chemotherapy drugs can damage the nerves and cause peripheral neuropathy which is accompanied by severe neuropathic pain or gait impairment. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and the safety of acupuncture for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy following chemotherapy in Korean breast cancer patients.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30420895 PMCID: PMC6215569 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5367014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1A schema of the study visits and measurements.
Acupuncture points prescriptions and their anatomical position.
| Prescription | Location | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name (English/Han Geul) | Point | Meridian | |
| Joining Valley/hap gok | LI 4 | Large intestine meridian | On the dorsum of the hand, between 1st and 2nd metacarpal bones, in the middle of the 2nd metacarpal bone on the radial side |
|
| |||
| Pool at the Crook/gok ji | LI 11 | Large intestine meridian | At the lateral end of the transverse cubital crease midway between the cubital crease on the radial side of the biceps brachii tendon and the lateral epicondyle of the humerus |
|
| |||
| Leg Three Miles/jok sam ni | ST 36 | Stomach meridian | 3 cuna below ST 35b, one finger width lateral from the anterior border of the tibia |
|
| |||
| Middle Margin/tae chung | LV 3 | Liver meridian | On the dorsum of the foot, in the depression proximal to the 1st metatarsal space |
|
| |||
| Eight Evils/pal sa | M-UE 9 ( | Extra points | On the dorsum of the hand, at the webs between each finger, at the junction of the red and white skin |
|
| |||
| Eight Winds/pal poong | M-LE 8 ( | Extra points | On the dorsum of the foot between the web and metatarsophalangeal joint |
a3 cun, the width of all four fingers except the thumb, measured at the level of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger.
bST 35, with knee flexed, below the patella in a depression lateral to the patellar ligament.
cSP 5, a point in a depression distal and inferior to the medial malleolus midway between the tuberosity of the navicular bone and the tip of the medial malleolus.
dST 41, a point on the midpoint of the transverse crease of the ankle, approximately level with the tip of the external malleolus, in a depression between the tendons of extensor digitorum longus and hallucis longus.
Figure 2Anatomical position of acupuncture points prescriptions.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.
| Variable | N (%) or Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 58.7 ± 7.5 |
|
| |
| Height, cm | 153.9 ± 5.3 |
|
| |
| Weight, kg | 59.9 ± 7.5 |
|
| |
| Menopausal status | |
| Premenopause | 1 (10) |
| Postmenopause | 9 (90) |
|
| |
| Comorbidity | |
| Yes | 8 (80) |
| No | 2 (20) |
|
| |
| Type of surgery | |
| Mastectomy w/ axillary lymph node dissection | 6 (60) |
| Breast conserving surgery w/axillary lymph node dissection | 3 (30) |
| Breast conserving surgery w/sentinel node biopsy | 1 (10) |
|
| |
| Grade of CIPN | |
| Grade I | 4 (40) |
| Grade II | 5 (50) |
| Grade III | 1 (10) |
| Grade IV | 0 (0) |
SD, standard deviation; CIPN, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.
Figure 3Changes in mean scores of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) over time: (a) mean NPSI score for burning pain, (b) pressing pain, (c) paroxysmal pain, (d) evoked pain, (e) dysesthesia/paresthesia, and (f) total NPSI score.
Results of nerve conduction study from baseline to the end of the final acupuncture session.
| Participants | Findings of nerve conduction study | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | At the end of the last treatment | Results | |
| 1 | No electrophysiological evidencea of peripheral neuropathy in all extremities | No electrophysiological evidencea of peripheral neuropathy in all extremities | Normal |
|
| |||
| 2 | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb in all extremities | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb in upper and lower extremities | No interval change |
|
| |||
| 3 | Suggestive of right distal median neuropathy | No electrophysiological evidencea of peripheral neuropathy in all extremities | Improved |
|
| |||
| 4 | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb in all extremities | Suggestive of right distal median neuropathy | Improved |
|
| |||
| 5 | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb in all extremities | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb | No interval change |
|
| |||
| 6 | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb in lower extremities | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb in lower extremities | No interval change |
|
| |||
| 7 | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb | Suggestive of sensory polyneuropathyb | No interval change |
|
| |||
| 8 | No definite electro-physiologic evidencea of neuropathy | No definite electro-physiologic evidencea of neuropathy | Normal |
|
| |||
| 9 | Indicative of left median neuropathy | Suggest left median neuropathy | Improved |
|
| |||
| 10 | No electrophysiological evidencea of polyneuropathy, radiculopathy, myopathy | No definite electro-physiologic evidencea of polyneuropathy | Normal |
aNo electrophysiological evidence, normal nerve conduction studies (NCS) including motor NCS, sensory NCS, F wave study, and H-reflex study.
bSuggestive of sensory polyneuropathy, decreased sensory nerve action potential amplitude and sensory nerve conduction velocity with normal motor NCS, F wave, and H-reflex study.
Changes of quality of life of breast cancer patients with CIPN assessed by the SF-36 from baseline to the end of the final acupuncture session.
| Variable | SF-36 score, mean (SD) | F ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | At the end of the last treatment | ||
| Physical functioning | 70.00 | 77.50 | 5.548 |
|
| |||
| Role limitations due to physical health problems | 54.38 | 69.38 | 11.676 |
|
| |||
| Role limitations due to emotional problems | 58.33 | 71.67 | 1.595 |
|
| |||
| Vitality | 48.13 | 51.88 | 0.503 |
|
| |||
| Emotional well-being | 55.50 | 64.50 | 4.734 |
|
| |||
| Social functioning | 60.00 | 82.50 | 12.356 |
|
| |||
| Bodily pain | 47.50 | 127.25 | 1.258 |
|
| |||
| General health perceptions | 50.00 | 58.00 | 16.000 |
Indicates statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Summary of the studies investigating the use of for the treatment of CIPN from the literature.
| Study | Design of the study | Number of patients | Included cancer types | Intervention and control | Protocol of acupuncture | Acupoint | Outcome measurement | Effects of acupuncture/Other results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shiqiang et al., 2017 [ | Prospective, randomized, single-blind | 27 | Stomach, intestine, lung, ovary, breast | Acupuncture vs EA | Two courses of treatment: once per day for 7 days (starting at the day before chemotherapy) then 14 days off, for total of 21 days per course | LI4, LV3 | PN, clinical symptoms, QoL, immune function | Improved/EA better than acupuncture |
|
| ||||||||
| Donald et al., 2011 [ | Retrospective, case series | 18 | MM, ALL, CML, colon, caecum, breast, ovary | Acupuncture, no control | Once a week for 6 weeks | SP6, ST36, LV3, LI4, BL60, | Subjective symptoms | Improved (82%) |
|
| ||||||||
| Schroeder et al., 2012 [ | Prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded, pilot study | 11 | Breast, colon, bronchial, lymphoma | Acupuncture and best medical care vs best medical care | for 10 weeks | ST34, EX-LE12, | NCS | Improved/Acupuncture better than control |
|
| ||||||||
| Wong et al., 2006 [ | Prospective case series | 5 | Gynecological cancer | Acupuncture, no control | Two courses of treatment: once a week for 6 weeks, then 4 weeks off, for total of 16 weeks | CV6, ST36, LI11, | Pain score, WHO CIPN grade | Improved |
|
| ||||||||
| Ben-Horin et al., 2017 [ | Retrospective analysis | 30 | Breast | Acupuncture and Reflexology (joint protocol) | 1 to 2 weekly, no available duration | LU11, LI1, PC9, TE1, HT9, SI1, SP1, LR1, ST45, GB44, BL67, KI1 | Symptom severity assessed by physician | Improved/Symptom-free at 6 months after starting treatment |
|
| ||||||||
| Xiong et al., 2016 [ | Prospective, randomized | 90 | Breast | Acupuncture vs mecobalamin injection vs acupoint injection | Once every 3 days for 10 times | LI11, LI4, ST36, SP6, SP10 | NCS, hemorrheology indicators | Improved/Acupoint injection with mecobalamin better than acupuncture |
|
| ||||||||
| Bao et al., 2011 [ | Case report | 1 | MM | Acupunctur, no control | Once per week for 6 treatments, then every other week for 4 treatments, then once every three weeks for 2 treatments, then once per month for 2 treatments, for total 14 acupuncture treatments | Shen men, point zero, two additional auricular acupuncture point, LI4, SJ5, LI11, ST40, | VAS pain score | Improved |
|
| ||||||||
| Jeong et al. (this study) | Prospective, single arm, pilot study | 10 | Breast | Acupuncture, no control | Three times a week for 4 weeks | LI4, LI11, ST36, LV3, | NPSI, NCS, SF-36 | Improved |
CIPN, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy; EA, electroacupuncture; PN, peripheral neuropathy; QoL, quality of life; MM, multiple myeloma; ALL, acute lymphoblastic lymphoma; CML, chronic myeloid lymphoma; WHO, World Health Organization; NCS, nerve conduction study; VAS, visual analogue scale; NPSI, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory; SF-36, 36-Item Short From Health Survey.