| Literature DB >> 30420726 |
Anne M Weaver1, Yi Wang2, Gregory A Wellenius3, Bessie Young4, Luke D Boyle5, DeMarc A Hickson6, Clarissa J Diamantidis7.
Abstract
Renal dysfunction is prevalent in the US among African Americans. Air pollution is associated with renal dysfunction in mostly white American populations, but has not been studied among African Americans. We evaluated cross-sectional associations between 1-year and 3-year fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) concentrations, and renal function among 5090 African American participants in the Jackson Heart Study. We used mixed-effect linear regression to estimate associations between 1-year and 3-year PM2.5 and O3 and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), serum creatinine, and serum cystatin C, adjusting for: sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, and medical history and accounting for clustering by census tract. At baseline, JHS participants had mean age 55.4 years, and 63.8% were female; mean 1-year and 3-year PM2.5 concentrations were 12.2 and 12.4 µg/m3, and mean 1-year and 3-year O3 concentrations were 40.2 and 40.7 ppb, respectively. Approximately 6.5% of participants had reduced eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73m2) and 12.7% had elevated UACR (> 30 mg/g), both indicating impaired renal function. Annual and 3-year O3 concentrations were inversely associated with eGFR and positively associated with serum creatinine; annual and 3-year PM2.5 concentrations were inversely associated with UACR. We observed impaired renal function associated with increased O3 but not PM2.5 exposure among African Americans.Entities:
Keywords: Renal; eGFR; ozone; particulate matter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30420726 PMCID: PMC6511484 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-018-0092-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ISSN: 1559-0631 Impact factor: 5.563
Descriptive characteristics of participants in Jackson Heart Study by eGFR status
| eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 (n = 322) | eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 (n = 4604) | Total (N = 5090) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Mean (SD) or % | Mean (SD) or % | Mean (SD) or % |
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 67.9 (9.6) | 54.5 (12.5) | 55.4 (12.8) |
| Female | 171 (53.1) | 2948 (64.0) | 3245 (63.8) |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 32.0 (6.8) | 31.7 (7.3) | 31.7 (7.2) |
| Highest level of education completed | |||
| Less than high school | 136 (42.6) | 841 (18.3) | 1023 (20.2) |
| High school/GED | 103 (32.3) | 1710 (37.3) | 1866 (36.8) |
| College degree/certificate | 40 (12.5) | 1273 (27.7) | 1352 (26.7) |
| Graduate/professional school | 40 (12.5) | 767 (16.7) | 832 (16.4) |
| Household income status | |||
| Low | 63 (23.7) | 575 (14.7) | 670 (15.5) |
| Lower-middle | 84 (31.6) | 930 (23.8) | 1049 (24.3) |
| Upper-middle | 67 (25.2) | 1180 (30.1) | 1283 (29.8) |
| High | 52 (19.6) | 1230 (31.4) | 1310 (30.4) |
| Neighborhood SES z-score, mean (SD)1 | −1.42 (4.88) | −0.22 (5.01) | −0.29 (5.01) |
| Medical Insurance Access | 302 (94.4) | 3952 (86.2) | 4394 (86.7) |
| Smoking status | |||
| Never | 197 (61.8) | 3117 (68.3) | 3436 (68.1) |
| Former | 90 (28.2) | 832 (18.2) | 942 (18.7) |
| Current | 32 (10.0) | 616 (13.5) | 667 (13.2) |
| Physical activity2 | |||
| Poor | 203 (63.2) | 2224 (48.3) | 2515 (49.5) |
| Intermediate | 81 (25.2) | 1471 (32.0) | 1601 (31.5) |
| Ideal | 37 (11.5) | 907 (19.7) | 970 (19.1) |
| Nutritional status | 165 (51.2) | 2811 (61.1) | 3082 (60.6) |
| Poor | |||
| Intermediate | 150 (46.6) | 1752 (38.1) | 1958 (38.5) |
| Ideal | 7 (2.2) | 41 (0.9) | 50 (1.0) |
| Alcohol consumption, past 12 months | 78 (24.3) | 2177 (47.5) | 2318 (45.8) |
| Occupation | |||
| Management/professional | 83 (25.9) | 1674 (36.4) | 1811 (35.6) |
| Service | 98 (30.5) | 1134 (24.6) | 1277 (25.1) |
| Sales | 40 (12.5) | 820 (17.8) | 890 (17.5) |
| Other | 100 (31.2) | 974 (21.2) | 1108 (21.8) |
| Hypertension | 293 (91.0) | 2669 (58.0) | 3053 (60.0) |
| Diabetes | 145 (45.0) | 928 (20.2) | 1103 (21.9) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 136 (42.5) | 1338 (29.1) | 1505 (29.7) |
| PM2.5 1-year mean (μg/m3) | 12.3 (0.6) | 12.2 (0.6) | 12.2 (0.6) |
| PM2.5 3-year mean (μg/m3) | 12.5 (0.5) | 12.4 (0.5) | 12.4 (0.5) |
| O3 1-year mean (ppb) | 40.3 (3.0) | 40.2 (2.7) | 40.2 (2.7) |
| O3 3-year mean (ppb) | 40.6 (2.9) | 40.7 (2.6) | 40.7 (2.6) |
Percent missing: BMI 0.2, Education level 0.3, Household income status 15.3, medical insurance access 0.4, smoking 0.9, physical activity 0.08, alcohol consumption 0.6, occupation 0.08, hypertension 0.08, diabetes 1.2, hyperlipidemia 0.3
p<0.05
Markers of renal function of participants in Jackson Heart (N = 5090)
| Mean (SD) or n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Mean (SD), mL/min/1.73m2 | 92.9 (21.8) |
| Abnormal <60 mL/min/1.73m2 | 322 (6.5) |
| Normal ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 | 4604 (93.4) |
| Median (IQR), mg/g | 6.0 (9.0) |
| Normal ≤30 mg/g | 2759 (87.3) |
| Abnormal >30 mg/g | 401 (12.7) |
| Mean (SD), mg/dL | 1.00 (0.6) |
| Mean (SD), mg/L | 0.76 (0.38) |
Percent missing: eGFR 3.2, Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio 37.9, serum creatinine 1.7, serum cystatin C 2.8
Calculated from spot urine samples of 2434 participants and 24-hour urine samples of 726 participants (37.9% missing urine)
Results from linear regression of PM2.5 and O3 and markers of renal function among Jackson Heart Study participants (N = 5090).
| Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year PM2.5 | 3-year PM2.5 | 1-year O3 | 3-year O3 | |
| Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | |
| Model 1[ | −3.0 (−4.5, −1.6)[ | −2.9 (−5.8, −2.0)[ | −0.1 (−0.3, 0.1) | 0.2 (−0.08, 0.4) |
| Model 2[ | 0.7 (−0.2, 1.6) | 0.8 (−0.4, 2.0) 0.3 | −0.2 (−0.4, 0.01) | −0.2 (−0.4, −0.02)[ |
| Model 3[ | 0.3 (−0.8, 1.3) | (−0.9, 1.6) | −0.3 (−0.5, −0.01)[ | −0.3 (−0.6, −0.04)[ |
| Model 4[ | 0.6 (−0.3, 1.5) | 0.8 (−0.4, 1.9) | (−0.4, 0.03) | −0.2 (−0.4, −0.004)[ |
| Model 5[ | 0.8 (−0.08, 1.7) | 0.8 (−0.4, 2.0) | −0.2 (−0.4, −0.01)[ | −0.2 (−0.4, −0.02)[ |
| Model 1[ | −0.0008 (−0.08, 0.08) | −0.007 (−0.1, 0.1) | 0.005 (−0.02, 0.03) | −0.003 (−0.03, 0.02) |
| Model 2[ | −0.09 (−0.2, −0.02)[ | −0.2 (−0.3, −0.06)[ | −0.009 (−0.03, 0.01) | −0.006 (−0.03, 0.02) |
| Model 3[ | −0.09 (−0.2, 0.009) | −0.1 (−0.3, 0.004) | −0.0004 (−0.03, 0.03) | 0.01 (−0.02, 0.04) |
| Model 4[ | −0.1 (−0.2, −0.03)[ | −0.2 (−0.3, −0.09)[ | −0.008 (−0.03, 0.01) | −0.005 (−0.03, 0.02) |
| Model 5[ | −0.09 (−0.2, −0.02)[ | (−0.3, −0.06)[ | 0.004 (−0.02, 0.03) | 0.0008 (−0.02, 0.03) |
| Model 1[ | 0.002 (−0.01, 0.02) | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.01) | 0.003 (−0.002, 0.008) | 0.002 (−0.003, 0.006) |
| Model 2[ | −0.009 (−0.03, 0.007) | −0.02 (−0.04, 0.001) | 0.004 (−0.0005, 0.008) | 0.004 (−0.0001, 0.007) |
| Model 3[ | 0.009 (−0.02, 0.04) | 0.008 (−0.02, 0.04) | 0.005 (0.0006, 0.01)[ | 0.005 (0.0005, 0.01)[ |
| Model 4[ | −0.008 (−0.02, 0.008) | −0.02 (−0.04, 0.002) | 0.004 (−0.0008, 0.008) | 0.003 (−0.0004, 0.007) |
| Model 5[ | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.004) | −0.02 (−0.04, 0002) | 0.004 (−0.0002, 0.009) | 0.004 (−0.0002, 0.007) |
| Model 1[ | 0.02 (0.005, 0.04)[ | 0.02 (0.005, 0.05)[ | 0.002 (−0.002, 0.005) | −0.001 (−0.004, 0.002) |
| Model 2[ | −0.008 (−0.02, .005) | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.005) | 0.002 (−0.002, 0.005) | 0.002 (−0.001, 0.004) |
| Model 3[ | 0.004 (−0.01, 0.02) | 0.009 (−0.01, 0.03) | 0.002 (−0.0006, 0.005) | 0.003 (−0.0007, 0.006) |
| Model 4[ | −0.007 (−0.02, 0.006) | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.006) | 0.001 (−0.002, 0.004) | 0.001 (−0.002, 0.004) |
| Model 5[ | −0.009 (−0.02, 0.004) | −0.01 (−0.03, 0.005) | 0.002 (−0.001, 0.005) | 0.002 (−0.001, 0.004) |
Model 1 unadjusted, accounting for clustering on census tract
Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, NSES z-score, medical insurance, smoking status, physical activity, alcohol consumption, occupation, and hyperlipidemia, accounting for clustering by census tract
Model 3 adjusted for all covariates in model 2, plus use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, diuretic medication, and statin medications, accounting for clustering by census tract
Model 4 adjusted for all covariates in model 2, plus diabetes and hypertension, accounting for clustering by census tract
Model 5 adjusted for all covariates in model 2, plus the other pollutant, O3 in PM2.5 models, and PM2.5 in O3 models, accounting for clustering by census tract
p<0.05