Literature DB >> 30420254

Results of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Unique Cohort at 19yr of Follow-up.

Daniël F Osses1, Sebastiaan Remmers2, Fritz H Schröder2, Theo van der Kwast3, Monique J Roobol2.   

Abstract

We assessed the effect of screening in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam pilot 1 study cohort with men randomized in 1991-1992. A total of 1134 men were randomized on a 1:1 basis to a screening (S) and control (C) arm after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing (PSA ≥10.0ng/ml was excluded from randomization). Further PSA testing was offered to all men in the S-arm with 4-yr intervals starting at age 55yr and screened up to the age of 74yr. Overall, a PSA level of ≥3.0ng/ml triggered biopsy. At time of analysis, 63% of men had died. Overall relative risk of metastatic (M+) disease and prostate cancer (PCa) death was 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.11) and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.17-1.36), respectively, in favor of screening. This ERSPC Rotterdam pilot 1 study cohort, screened in a period without noteworthy contamination, shows that PSA-based screening could result in considerable reductions of M+ disease and mortality which if confirmed in larger datasets should trigger further discussion on pros/cons of PCa screening. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In a cohort with 19yr of follow-up, we found indications for a more substantial reduction in metastatic disease and cancer-specific mortality in favor of prostate cancer screening than previously reported. If confirmed in larger cohorts, these findings should be considered in the ongoing discussion on harms and benefits of prostate cancer screening.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer-specific mortality; Metastatic disease; PSA-based screening; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30420254     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

1.  [Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) : A commentary on a systematic review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  A Borkowetz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Trivialization of prostate cancer? : Stage shift and possible causes].

Authors:  M Saar; M S K M Abdeen; C Niklas; Z T F Al-Kailani; S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Prostate cancer screening - is it time to change approach?

Authors:  Marek Vargovčák; Erik Dorko; Kvetoslava Rimárová; Viliam Knap
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  Personalized strategies in population screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Remmers; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Abandon the Label of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Mertens; Pim J van Leeuwen; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.