| Literature DB >> 30419729 |
Won Gi Yoo1, Sun-Min Kim2, Eun Jeong Won3, Ji-Yun Lee1,4, Fuhong Dai1,5, Ho Choon Woo6, Ho-Woo Nam7, Tae Im Kim1,8, Jeong-Hee Han9, Dongmi Kwak10, Yun Sang Cho11, Seung-Won Kang12, Tong-Soo Kim13, Xing-Quan Zhu14, Chunren Wang15, Heejeong Youn2, Sung-Jong Hong1.
Abstract
To investigate the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pork on the market in Korea, an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for tissue fluid (CAU-tf-ELISA) was developed using a soluble extract of T. gondii RH strain tachyzoites. As the standard positive controls, the piglets were experimentally infected with T. gondii: Group A (1,000 cysts-containing bradyzoites), Group B (500 cysts-containing bradyzoites) and Group C (1.0×103 or 1.0×104 tachyzoites). The CAU-tf-ELISA demonstrated infection intensity-dependent positivity toward tissue fluids with average cut-off value 0.15: 100% for Group A, 93.8% for Group B and 40.6% for Group C. When tissue-specific cut-off values 0.066-0.199 were applied, CAU-tf-ELISA showed 96.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive and 90.0% negative predictive values. When compared with the same tissue fluids, performance of CAU-tf-ELISA was better than that of a commercial ELISA kit. Of the 583 Korea domestic pork samples tested, anti-T. gondii antibodies were detected from 9.1% of whole samples and 37.9% from skirt meat highest among pork parts. In the 386 imported frozen pork samples, 1.8% (skirt meat and shoulder blade) were positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies. In Korea, prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in the pork on retail markets appeared high, suggesting that regulations on pig farming and facilities are necessary to supply safe pork on the tables.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; Korean; Toxoplasma gondii; imported; pork; tissue fluid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30419729 PMCID: PMC6243190 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2018.56.5.437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Fig. 1Increase of anti-T. gondii antibodies in the sera of standard positive controls in the early phase of infection.
Fig. 2Antibody titer of each part of the T. gondii-infected piglets using CAU-tf-ELISA kit and Commercial kit S. (A) The mean±2 standard deviations of the antibody titer of Group D was designated as the cut-off value (0.15) for CAU-tf-ELISA. (B) The cut-off value (0.3) for the OD450 was used for the Commercial kit S according to the manufacturer’s guideline. Tissue-specific cut-off values were applied for CAU-tf-ELISA (C) and Commercial kit S (D) according to each meat portion (See the details in Table 3).
Comparison of the functionality of CAU-tf-ELISA kit and Commercial kit S for tissue fluids samples from the standard positive controls
| Pork Part | No. of positive samples (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Subtotal (Groups A-C) | Group D | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| CAU-tf-ELISA | Commercial kit S | CAU-tf-ELISA | Commercial kit S | CAU-tf-ELISA | Commercial kit S | CAU-tf-ELISA | Commercial kit S | CAU-tf-ELISA | Commercial kit S | |
| Heart | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 1 (25.0) | 10 (100) | 7 (70.0) | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Skirt meat | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 3 (75.0) | 1 (25.0) | 9 (90.0) | 7 (70.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Tenderloin | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 4 (100) | 3 (75.0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (90.0) | 5 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Sirloin | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 4 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (70.0) | 2 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Pork belly | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | 4 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (70.0) | 1 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Shoulder picnic | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | 4 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (60.0) | 1 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Ham | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 3 (75.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (50.0) | 3 (30.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Shoulder blade | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (60.0) | 1 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Total | 16 (100) | 13 (81.3) | 30 (93.8) | 12 (37.5) | 13 (40.6) | 2 (6.3) | 59 (73.8) | 27 (33.8) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Serum | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 1 (25.0) | 10 (100) | 7 (70.0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) |
Positive rate (%) was determined by a cut-off value of 0.15 for the CAU-tf-ELISA kit and 0.3 for the Commercial kit S.
As supporting data.
Diagnostic performance of the CAU-tf-ELISA kit and Commercial kit S in terms of detection of anti-T. gondii antibodies
| ELISA (cut-off value) | Results | No. of specimens with | Diagnostic performance [95% confidence interval] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Positive | Negative | Subtotal | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | ||
| CAU-tf-ELISA (0.15) | Positive | 69 | 2 | 71 | ||||
| Negative | 21 | 25 | 46 | |||||
| Subtotal | 90 | 27 | 117 | 76.70% [66.6% to 84.9%] | 92.60% [75.7% to 99.1%] | 97.20% [90.1% to 99.3%] | 54.40% [44.6% to 63.7%] | |
|
| ||||||||
| Commercial kit S (0.3) | Positive | 34 | 0 | 34 | ||||
| Negative | 56 | 27 | 83 | |||||
| Subtotal | 90 | 27 | 117 | 37.80% [27.8% to 48.6%] | 100% [87.2% to 100%] | 100% | 32.50% [29.1% to 36.2%] | |
|
| ||||||||
| CAU-tf-ELISA (tissue-specific values) | Positive | 87 | 0 | 87 | ||||
| Negative | 3 | 27 | 30 | |||||
| Subtotal | 90 | 27 | 117 | 96.70% [90.6% to 99.3%] | 100% [87.2% to 100%] | 100% | 90.00% [74.7% to 96.5%] | |
Functionality of CAU-tf-ELISA kit and Commercial kit S applied with tissue-specific cut-off values
| Pork Part | CAU-tf-ELISA | Commercial kit S | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Cut-off value | No. of positive (%) | Cut-off value | No. of positive (%) | |||
|
|
| |||||
| Groups A-C | Group D | Groups A-C | Group D | |||
| Heart | 0.199 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.005 | 10 (100) | 2 (66.6) |
|
| ||||||
| Skirt meat | 0.068 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.072 | 9 (90.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Tenderloin | 0.088 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.006 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Sirloin | 0.073 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.005 | 9 (90.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Belly | 0.079 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.006 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Shoulder picnic | 0.074 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.005 | 9 (90.0) | 1 (33.3) |
|
| ||||||
| Ham | 0.115 | 7 (70.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.016 | 7 (70.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Shoulder blade | 0.066 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.006 | 9 (90.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 77 (96.3) | 0 (0.0) | 73 (91.3) | 43 (12.5) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Serum | 0.207 | 10 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0.005 | 10 (100) | 1 (33.3) |
As supporting data.
Fig. 3Correlation between T. gondii antibody levels of the standard positive controls assayed using the CAU-tf-ELISA kit and Commercial kit S.
Prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in the tissue fluid of local and imported pork determined by CAU-tf-ELISA
| Pork | No. of samples collected | Positivity (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Meat | Tissue fluid | ||
| Local | |||
| Skirt meat | 120 | 116 | 44 (37.9) |
| Heart | 120 | 120 | 8 (6.7) |
| Belly | 124 | 117 | 1 (0.9) |
| Shoulder picnic | 120 | 113 | 0 (0.0) |
| Loin | 120 | 117 | 0 (0.0) |
| Subtotal | 604 | 583 | 53 (9.1) |
|
| |||
| Imported (Country) | |||
| Belly | 186 | 183 | 0 (0.0) |
| Skirt meat (Mexico) | 20 | 20 | 2 (10.0) |
| Skirt meat (Canada) | 20 | 20 | 0 (0.0) |
| Skirt meat (France) | 20 | 20 | 0 (0.0) |
| Shoulder picnic (USA) | 22 | 22 | 0 (0.0) |
| Shoulder blade (Chile) | 62 | 62 | 0 (0.0) |
| Shoulder blade (Mexico) | 50 | 49 | 4 (8.2) |
| Shoulder blade (Spain) | 10 | 10 | 1 (10.0) |
| Subtotal | 390 | 386 | 7 (1.8) |
|
| |||
| Total | 994 | 969 | 60 (6.2) |
Twenty imported pork belly samples analyzed from Austria, Belgium, USA, Chile, France, Hungary, the Netherlands, and Spain each, and 26 samples from Germany were analyzed.
Prevalence of T. gondii antibodies in the tissue fluid of local pork using CAU-tf-ELISA according to the surveyed region
| Pork | No. examined | No. of positive samples (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seoul | Daejeon | Daegu | Busan | Gwangju | Jeju | Subtotal | ||
| Skirt | 116 | 2 (10.0) | 3 (15.8) | 10 (58.8) | 12 (60.0) | 6 (30.0) | 11 (55.0) | 44 (37.9) |
| Heart | 120 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (15.0) | 3 (15.0) | 1 (5.0) | 1 (5.0) | 8 (6.7) |
| Belly | 117 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) |
| Shoulder picnic | 113 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Loin | 117 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Total | 583 | 2 (2.0) | 4 (4.0) | 13 (15.1) | 15 (15.5) | 7 (7.0) | 12 (11.9) | 53 (9.1) |