| Literature DB >> 30419634 |
Jong Soo Han1, Su Jin Kim1, Yoonjin Nam1, Hak Yeong Lee1, Geon Min Kim1, Dong Min Kim1, Uy Dong Sohn1.
Abstract
Most diabetic patients experience diabetic mellitus (DM) urinary bladder dysfunction. A number of studies evaluate bladder smooth muscle contraction in DM. In this study, we evaluated the change of bladder smooth muscle contraction between normal rats and DM rats. Furthermore, we used pharmacological inhibitors to determine the differences in the signaling pathways between normal and DM rats. Rats in the DM group received an intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg streptozotocin and measured blood glucose level after 14 days to confirm DM. Bladder smooth muscle contraction was induced using acetylcholine (ACh, 10⁻⁴ M). The materials such as, atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist), U73122 (a phospholipase C inhibitor), DPCPX (an adenosine A₁ receptor antagonist), udenafil (a PDE5 inhibitor), prazosin (an α₁-receptor antagonist), papaverine (a smooth muscle relaxant), verapamil (a calcium channel blocker), and chelerythrine (a protein kinase C inhibitor) were pre-treated in bladder smooth muscle. We found that the DM rats had lower bladder smooth muscle contractility than normal rats. When prazosin, udenafil, verapamil, and U73122 were pre-treated, there were significant differences between normal and DM rats. Taken together, it was concluded that the change of intracellular Ca²⁺ release mediated by PLC/IP3 and PDE5 activity were responsible for decreased bladder smooth muscle contractility in DM rats.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder; Contractility; Diabetes; PLC; Smooth muscle
Year: 2019 PMID: 30419634 PMCID: PMC6319557 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.Representative traces and tension comparison for ACh-induced contraction of bladder smooth muscle in normal and DM rats. (A) ACh-induced contraction. (B) Average tension for ACh-induced contraction in normal and DM rats. The left- and right-hand sides of 1A represent normal and DM rats, respectively. ACh was added at a concentration of 10−4 M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=13). *p<0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Fig. 2.Changes in contraction following atropine treatment of bladder smooth muscle from normal or DM rats. ACh-induced contraction. Atropine was added at 10−6 M. ACh was added at 10−4 M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=6).
Fig. 3.Changes in contraction following prazosin treatment of bladder smooth muscle from normal or DM rats. ACh-induced contraction. Prazosin was added at 10−6 M. ACh was added at 10−4 M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=6). *p<0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Fig. 4.Changes in contraction following DPCPX treatment of bladder smooth muscle from normal or DM rats. ACh-induced contraction. DPCPX was added at 10−6 M. ACh was added at 10−4 M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=6).
Fig. 5.Changes in contraction following verapamil treatment of bladder smooth muscle from normal or DM rats. ACh-induced contraction. (A) Verapamil, (B) U73122, (C) Chelerythrine was added at 10−6 M. ACh was added at 10−4 M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=6). *p<0.05 by Student’s t-test.
Fig. 6.Changes in contraction following udenafil treatment of bladder smooth muscle from normal or DM rats. ACh-induced contraction. (A) Udenafil, (B) NaHS, (C) Papaverine was added at 10−6 M. ACh was added at 10−4 M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=6). *p<0.05 by Student’s t-test.