Literature DB >> 30419073

Functional diversity and nutritional content in a deep-sea faunal assemblage through total lipid, lipid class, and fatty acid analyses.

Camilla Parzanini1, Christopher C Parrish1, Jean-François Hamel2, Annie Mercier1.   

Abstract

Lipids are key compounds in marine ecosystems being involved in organism growth, reproduction, and survival. Despite their biological significance and ease of measurement, the use of lipids in deep-sea studies is limited, as is our understanding of energy and nutrient flows in the deep ocean. Here, a comprehensive analysis of total lipid content, and lipid class and fatty acid composition, was used to explore functional diversity and nutritional content within a deep-sea faunal assemblage comprising 139 species from 8 phyla, including the Chordata, Arthropoda, and Cnidaria. A wide range of total lipid content and lipid class composition suggested a diversified set of energy allocation strategies across taxa. Overall, phospholipid was the dominant lipid class. While triacylglycerol was present in most taxa as the main form of energy storage, a few crustaceans, fish, jellyfishes, and corals had higher levels of wax esters/steryl esters instead. Type and amount of energy reserves may reflect dietary sources and environmental conditions for certain deep-sea taxa. Conversely, the composition of fatty acids was less diverse than that of lipid class composition, and large proportions of unsaturated fatty acids were detected, consistent with the growing literature on cold-water species. In addition, levels of unsaturation increased with depth, likely suggesting an adaptive strategy to maintain normal membrane structure and function in species found in deeper waters. Although proportions of n-3 fatty acids were high across all phyla, representatives of the Chordata and Arthropoda were the main reservoirs of these essential nutrients, thus suggesting health benefits to their consumers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30419073      PMCID: PMC6231680          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Lipids represent the densest form of energy in marine ecosystems since they provide about 1.5 and 2 times more energy per gram than proteins and carbohydrates, respectively [1, 2]. They are also key components of cell membranes [1], and are involved in numerous cellular and physiological processes crucial to the reproduction, growth, and general survival of organisms [2, 3]. For example, lipids are deposited during oogenesis in fish and zooplankton [1, 2], and several other marine taxa [1, 2], and they can be transferred as lipoprotein from mother to oocytes to provide energy to embryos [4]. By definition, lipids are insoluble in polar solvents, but soluble in non-polar organic solvents which makes them relatively easy to extract from biological tissues for analysis [5]. For this reason, they have become useful in investigations of the drivers of ecosystem health and functioning [6], food web structure and dynamics [7], as well as carbon cycling [8] and contaminant bioaccumulation [9] in the marine environment. While a vast body of literature exists for shallow-water species [10-14], the study of lipids in deep-sea taxa lags behind, and is mostly limited to the analysis of fatty acids as trophic biomarkers [15-17] with a focus on certain deep-water taxa or faunal groups, such as fish, corals, and zooplankton [18-21]. Lipid extracts of aquatic samples can be separated into different classes, including phospholipids (PL) and triacylglycerols (TAG), which are of primary interest in studies of marine ecosystems [1]. Specifically, PL are the principal constituents of animal cell membranes and are found in all animal phyla [3, 6]; while TAG are the main form of energy storage in both terrestrial and marine animals [6]. Other lipid classes, such as sterols (ST) and wax esters (WE), also play important roles in marine organisms. ST are key constituents of animal cell surface membranes [22]. They are also precursors of steroid hormones, and represent essential dietary nutrients for bivalves [23], crustaceans [23] and other marine taxa [1]. Conversely, WE constitute the primary energy storage of certain shallow-water corals and sea anemones [24], as well as deep-sea crustaceans and fish [16, 21]. Wax esters also control buoyancy in myctophid fish [25] and diapausing zooplankton which overwinter in deep waters and re-enter the surface layers in spring to feed [21]. Not only single lipid classes, but also lipid class composition provides useful information about the biology and ecology of organisms. For example, the triacylglycerol to sterol ratio (TAG:ST) can assess the physiological condition of fish, bivalve, and crustacean larvae exposed to various stressors [26]; and the phospholipid to sterol ratio (PL:ST) provides an indication of membrane fluidity in fish and bivalves [21]. As major components of most lipids, fatty acids (FA) are commonly referred to as “building blocks” [27, 28]. Two FA chains (or acyl chains) are for instance attached to the glycerol backbone of a PL molecule, whereas TAG is comprised of three FA chains. Dietary FA can be either oxidized to produce high-energy molecules (i.e. ATP), or they can be transferred into membrane PL, where they play a major role in membrane structure and function [3]. In addition, certain FA are considered essential nutrients because required for optimal health and most organisms are unable to synthesize them de novo [5, 27, 28]. In marine ecosystems, three major essential FA can be identified, including docosahexaenoic (DHA; 22:6n-3) and eicosapentaenoic (EPA; 20:5n-3) acids from the n-3 series, and arachidonic acid (ARA; 20:4n-6) from the n-6 series. These specific polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) are precursors of docosanoids and eicosanoids, which regulate numerous cell processes [5]. Through biochemical and biophysical processes, 22:6n-3, 20:5n-3, and 20:4n-6 are involved in neurological development and signaling [29], and support immunity [30] and growth [5]. However, the extent to which these three essential FA are required and occur within tissues may vary across taxa, or even intraspecifically with age, sex, season, and habitat [28, 31, 32]. Typically, marine organisms present higher levels of n-3 PUFA than terrestrial counterparts, which instead have larger proportions of n-6 PUFA [28]. While a latitudinal trend has been found, whereby marine species from polar regions have higher levels of PUFA than those from tropical areas [28], a limited number of studies has compared shallow and deep-water species. Stowasser et al. [33] observed that shallower (<4000 m) individuals of deep-sea macrourid and morid fish species, collected in the Northeast Atlantic, had higher proportions of PUFA in their liver than their deeper counterparts. Conversely, monounsaturated FA (MUFA) increased with depth, while no bathymetric trends were detected for either PUFA or MUFA when analyzing muscle tissue [33]. The Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador is located in a cold-temperate region of the Northwest Atlantic, where species with subarctic/Arctic affinities are common. While several studies have been carried out in coastal and other shallow-water ecosystems of the region [11–13, 34–39], information on the lipid content and composition of the deep-sea counterparts remains fragmentary. Data only exist for total lipid contents and classes (50–1500 m) [19], as well as FA composition in corals (770–1370 m) [40]; and lipid contents, classes, and FA signatures in deep-sea gastropods and their epibiotic sea anemones (191–627 m) [41]. In order to provide novel information and baseline data for a broader range of deep dwelling taxa, the present investigation assessed total lipid content, lipid classes, and FA composition inside a deep-sea macrofaunal assemblage sampled within a tight temporal and spatial window in the Northwest Atlantic. The rich diversity analyzed here included 139 species across 8 major phyla, collected on the upper and mid-slope area off the east coast of Newfoundland. We explored the lipid profiles of a wide range of deep-sea taxa, most of which have not been studied in these terms yet, such as the Ascidiacea, and conducted both a broad cross-taxa comparative analysis, and an in-depth phylum-specific study of selected lipid and FA groups indicative of energy-storage strategies, physiological processes and dietary value for consumers, including humans. High levels of variability in lipid class and FA compositions were expected to occur within and across taxa, given the broad taxonomic range represented. Moreover, it was hypothesized that both lipid class and FA composition would vary along the bathymetric gradient covered (~1000 m), with higher levels of unsaturation occurring at greater depths to compensate for pressure/temperature variations.

Materials and methods

Sampling

Organisms belonging to various taxa were opportunistically collected within 7 days in November-December 2013, during one of the annual multispecies bottom-trawl surveys conducted by Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), Canada, onboard the CCGS Teleost. Sampling followed a stratified random design with a minimum of two sets per stratum, and tow durations of ~ 15 min (~ 4.8 km h−1 gear opened and closed at sampling depth). Individuals were collected from a total of 23 tows inside a 100 km radius with a mean depth range of 313 to 1407 m. The gear used included a 16.9 m wide net with four panels of polyethylene twine. Further details are found in Walsh and McCallum [42]. Mean bottom temperature at the sampling site was 4.0 ± 0.3°C, with a slight decrease with depth. The sampling area, referred to as NAFO Division 3K, is located off Newfoundland, eastern Canada, in the Northwest Atlantic (49° 31’- 51° 51’N, 49° 32’- 51° 13’W). Once on board, individuals were immediately vacuum packed and frozen at -20°C to minimize lipid oxidation and hydrolysis. Individuals were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level from direct observation and through photo-identification. A total of 284 deep-sea organisms, belonging to 139 species and 8 phyla, were weighed for total wet mass (post-freezing), once in the lab, and processed for lipid analysis at the CREAIT-ARC Facility of Memorial University (Table 1). Tissues characterized by low turnover rates were purposely selected for analysis, since they provide longer-term information. Specifically, the following tissues were sampled, as recommended by previous investigators [43]: dorsal white muscle from fish; body wall and tube feet from echinoderms; foot muscle from gastropods; mantle from cephalopods; non-gonad soft tissues or body walls from cnidarians; and dorsal abdominal muscle from crustaceans. When collection of target tissues was not feasible due to small body size, whole individuals were processed after being rinsed with distilled water. This was the case for 5 individuals of the phylum Annelida (i.e. Alitta succinea, Nereididae sp. 1, Polychaeta sp. 1, Polynoidae sp. 3, and Prionospio sp.), 10 of the Arthropoda (species of Arcoscalpellum michelottianum and Nymphon spp.), 2 of the Chordata (i.e. Ascidiacea sp. 3, and Eudistoma vitreum), and 3 of the Echinodermata (species of Gorgonocephalus sp., and Ophioscolex glacialis).
Table 1

Deep-sea macrofauna analyzed.

Phylum, class, and species analyzed, together with sample size, mean depth of collection, and mean values ±sd of wet mass and total lipid content are shown. Data are reported from the phylum containing the highest amounts of lipids to the phylum characterized by the lowest contents.

PhylumClassSpeciesNDepthMeanwet massMeantotal lipid content
    mg±sdmg g-1 wm±sd
Chordata      
 Actinopterygii    
  Alepocephalus bairdii2707–1321161.2±140.041.0±31.2
  Anoplogaster cornuta4919–136580.2±26.9148.0±30.6
  Antimora rostrata31090263.2±92.32.9±0.3
  Arctozenus risso2109015.1±15.667.3±75.2
  Bathylagus euryops210907.5±2.419.7±11.7
  Bathytroctes macrolepis2128267.3±35.26.0±2.1
  Borostomias antarcticus41090–132144.9±46.722.1±17.5
  Caristius macropus11365176.3172.4
  Chauliodus sloani6*889–136536.7±12.325.9±15.9
  Chiasmodon niger3136578.9±45.4568.9±417.4
  Coryphaenoides rupestris375954.3±23.44.8±1.9
  Cottunculus microps2889–91972.4±12.27.7±8.3
  Cottunculus thomsonii110901379.334.2
  Cyclothone microdon210906.6±0.126.4±11.2
  Gaidropsarus ensis4919–1090174.6±139.12.1±1.1
  Glyptocephalus cynoglossus3488321.54.8±2.1
  Haplophryne mollis1108419.02.4
  Lampadena speculigera1109012.490.5
  Lampanyctus spp.4109024.9±6.552.2±32.2
  Lepidion eques1868130.64.7
  Macrourus berglax5*759–109090.6±39.04.4±0.7
  Magnisudis atlantica21122–1321342.5±28.861.9±8.3
  Malacosteus niger2313–109438.8±0.968.0±2.9
  Melanocetus johnsonii11407178.87.4
  Myctophum sp.110906.2215.4
  Nezumia bairdii3*109097.2±54.54.7±2.8
  Notacanthus chemnitzii 3* -691.3±84.412.8±7.3
  Notoscopelus spp.2109021.7±6.8270.1±9.2
  Oneirodes macrosteus1759119.06.3
  Polyacanthonotus rissoanus3*1090–132194.2±34.633.0±17.6
  Reinhardtius hippoglossoides2*759–1090542.9141.7±148.2
  Scopeloberyx opisthopterus210903.8±0.222.8±2.8
  Scopelosaurus lepidus1*759128.843.6
  Sebastes mentella3488200.0±108.113.8±2.2
  Serrivomer beanii 3 -49.5±20.811.7±2.8
  Synaphobranchus kaupii31090100.0±14.7156.6±99
  Trachyrincus murrayi386894.2±5.42.8±0.4
  Xenodermichthys copei4759–88918.6±4.828.2±11
 Ascidiacea     
  Ascidiacea sp 14**759–140769.0±80.50.8±0.6
  Ascidiacea sp 21*7594.10.3
  Ascidiacea sp 31*3130.91.4
  Ascidiacea sp 427597.4±0.63.9±0.9
  Didemnum sp.17590.91.9
  Eudistoma vitreum111220.93.1
 Chondrichthyes    
  Amblyraja jenseni1919796.78.1
  Apristurus profundorum31324–13651805.4±249.59.0±3.1
  Centroscyllium fabricii29191177.7±72.86.8±0.5
  Malacoraja senta175981.711.1
  Rajella fyllae4919–13654.5±0.912.0±3.9
Arthropoda      
 Hexanauplia     
  Arcoscalpellum michelottianum31094–13656.6±1.510.6±5.1
 Malacostraca    
  Acanthephyra pelagica3*10907.0±0.934.0±7.7
  Anonyx sp 1113650.694.6
  Anonyx sp 2113210.7281.6
  Gnathophausia zoea3*1090–12821.5±0.620.5±2.3
  Munida tenuimana18681.11.3
  Munidopsis curvirostra31084–12821.6±0.433.5±42.7
  Notostomus robustus1136511.95.2
  Pandalus borealis34885.6±0.215.8±7.5
  Pasiphaea tarda3132129.2±15.58.7±5.4
  Sabinea hystrix31090–10947.0±3.211.6±3.1
  Stereomastis sculpta31094–13214.6±2.14.4±2.3
  Themisto libellula13130.18.5
 Pycnogonida     
  Nymphon spp.6*347–8680.3±0.28.7±6
Echinodermata     
 Asteroidea     
  Astropecten americanus3112214.3±3.0218.2±13.0
  Brisingida spp.21084–136552.6±41.924.1±16.8
  Cheiraster sp.113653.50.4
  Ctenodiscus crispatus33133.1±1.02.6±0.4
  Freyella microspina1140770.2103.8
  Leptychaster arcticus33532.4±0.35.9±1.3
  Mediaster bairdi bairdi3109014.8±3.54.2±0.2
  Myxaster sol191971.15.7
  Psilaster andromeda2*868–136519.6±19.131.5±42.7
  Zoroaster fulgens3759–128216.8±17.816.6±26.6
 Echinoidea     
  Brisaster fragilis2*7593.7±2.51.9±2.6
  Phormosoma placenta388919.6±7.46.0±2.7
  Strongylocentrotus pallidus2353–37920.5±22.12.6±0.9
 Ophiuroidea     
  Gorgonocephalus sp.15951.242.4
  Ophiopholis aculeata23530.9±0.517.3±13.3
  Ophioscolex glacialis23530.7±0.315.3±2.6
  Ophiura sarsii312826.7±1.41.5±0.6
Annelida      
 Polychaeta     
  Alitta succinea110270.316.8
  Laetmonice filicornis15953.17.4
  Nereididae sp 11*8680.08.5
  Nereididae sp 213471.617.5
  Polynoidae sp 113471.96.3
  Polynoidae sp 225954±0.35.3±0.3
  Polynoidae sp 315950.715.6
  Polychaeta sp 115950.711.5
  Prionospio sp.18680.14.7
Cnidaria      
 Anthozoa     
  Acanella arbuscula3*759–11225.5±3.63.3±0.2
  Actinauge cristata2*759–889101.9±44.50.8±0.4
  Actinoscyphia aurelia3**796–102733.9±21.10.4±0.2
  Actinostola callosa3**75971.4±26.70.3±0.1
  Anthomastus agaricus3102712.2±7.14.1±1.9
  Anthomastus sp.18685.25.4
  Anthoptilum grandiflorum17594.835.4
  Duva florida1 -15.814.5
  Flabellum alabastrum27596.5±2.311.7±0.4
  Funiculina sp.110842.113.1
  Paragorgia arborea159590.313.3
  Pennatula aculeata312822.0±0.614.7±4.7
  Pennatula grandis2759–12824.2±2.218.7±8.2
  Umbellula sp.111223.831.1
 Scyphozoa     
  Atolla wyvillei3*109025.5±24.50.7±0.7
  Periphylla periphylla4**759–128258.9±94.21.8±0.8
  Scyphozoa sp.1*109059.70.6
Mollusca      
 Cephalopoda     
  Bathypolypus arcticus3464–132119.2±14.17.4±1.0
  Bathypolypus bairdii170750.14.3
  Cephalopoda sp 111282410.99.2
  Cephalopoda sp 211407986.8±127.42.8±1.4
  Chiroteuthis veranii11090151.212.0
  Illex coindetii3128254.2±7.210.2±3.2
  Neorossia caroli148817.25.2
  Rossia megaptera1140736.74.5
  Stauroteuthis syrtensis31090–140722.17.2
 Gastropoda     
  Arrhoges occidentalis 112826.24.4
  Buccinum sp.37595.8±2.66.9±1.3
  Colus spp.3759–88922±30.34.8±1.0
  Neptunea despecta18897.14.8
Porifera      
 Demospongiae    
  Cliona sp.1102776.06.1
  Craniella cranium3464–59513.1±6.16.9±1.0
  Geodia sp.11027577.95.1
  Haliclona sp.2132414.8±0.43.9±1.6
  Hamacantha (Vomerula) carteri148844.70.8
  Histodermella sp.1 -3.113.3
  Iophon piceum1353157.27.8
  Mycale (Mycale) lingua175955.44.1
  Phakellia sp.131393.35.2
  Polymastia spp.235319.7±14.39.9±0.7
  Polymastia hemisphaerica148829.74.5
  Stelletta sp.1112226.14.3
  Stryphnus ponderosus1 -14.810.6
  Tentorium semisuberites13536.113.8
  Thenea muricata435316.22.6±1.2
 Hexactinellida    
  Euplectella sp.21407–109487.7±107.44.3±3.7
  Hexactinellida sp 111027228.64.8
  Hexactinellida sp 21*140721.90.3
Sipuncula      
 Sipunculidea     
  Sipunculidea sp 1114073.57.3
  Sipunculidea sp 2111222.03.0

*, ** n = 1, 2 individual(s) removed from analysis of lipid composition

Deep-sea macrofauna analyzed.

Phylum, class, and species analyzed, together with sample size, mean depth of collection, and mean values ±sd of wet mass and total lipid content are shown. Data are reported from the phylum containing the highest amounts of lipids to the phylum characterized by the lowest contents. *, ** n = 1, 2 individual(s) removed from analysis of lipid composition

Lipid extraction

An aliquot of tissue (0.7 ± 0.2 g) was sampled from each still-frozen individual to limit lipid oxidation and hydrolysis. Prior to lipid extraction, each sample was immersed in chloroform (4 or 8 ml, depending on tissue amount), sealed under nitrogen gas, and stored in a freezer (-20ºC). Lipids were extracted and analyzed based on Parrish [44]. Briefly, samples were homogenized in a chloroform:methanol:water (2:1:1) mixture, sonicated, and centrifuged four times. Lipid extracts were pooled in a lipid-clean vial following each wash, and the total amount was concentrated down to volume under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Vials were sealed and stored at -20ºC until further analysis.

Total lipid content and lipid classes

Lipid extracts were analyzed using the Chromarod-Iatroscan TLC/FID system [45]. In detail, the lipid extracts were spotted on silica-gel coated rods (Chromarods-SIII) and developed in three solutions of different polarity, to allow lipid class separation. Samples were first developed in a mixture of hexane:diethyl ether:formic acid (98.95:1:0.05), which allowed the separation of hydrocarbons (HC), wax esters/steryl esters (WE/SE), ethyl esters (EE), methyl esters (ME), as well as ethyl and methyl ketones (EK and MK, respectively). Wax esters and steryl esters were considered together in this study as WE/SE, since the method used does not allow the separation of the two lipid classes. The second development, consisting of hexane, diethyl ether, and formic acid 79.9:20:0.1 led to the separation of diacyl glyceryl ethers (GE), triacyglycerols (TAG), free fatty acids (FFA), alcohols (AL), sterols (ST), and diacylglycerols (DAG). Lastly, acetone-mobile polar lipids (AMPL) and phospholipids (PL), the most polar among the lipid classes, were separated by the third development of 100% acetone followed by chloroform:methanol:chloroform-extracted-water (5:4:1). After each development, lipid classes were scanned on the rods using an Iatroscan MK V and quantified by combustion in a flame ionization detector. Lipid classes were identified and quantified through comparison with known standards, such as n-nonadecane for hydrocarbons, cholesteryl palmitate for SE, 3-hexadecanone for ketones, tripalmitin for triacyglycerols, palmitic acid for FFA, 1-hexadecanol for alcohols, cholesterol for sterols, 1-monopalmitoyl-rac-glycerol for acetone-mobile polar lipids, and DL-α-phosphatidylcholine dipalmitoyl for phospholipids. The sum of the amount of all the lipid classes in each sample provided the total lipid content (mg g-1 wet mass), while each lipid class was measured as percent of total lipids. Proportions of lipid classes were then used to calculate the triacylglycerol to sterol ratio (TAG:ST), or condition index [26], and the phospholipid to sterol ratio (PL:ST) as a measure of membrane fluidity [46, 47].

FA analysis

FA were derivatized at 100ºC with H2SO4 in methanol, and quantified as methyl esters by gas chromatography. Briefly, an aliquot of the lipid extract, calculated in relation to the total amount of lipids within each tissue sample, was transferred into a lipid clean vial and evaporated under N2, to dryness. After adding 1.5 ml of dichloromethane and 3 ml of Hilditch reagent (i.e. H2SO4 dissolved in methanol) to samples, vials were sonicated, sealed, and heated for 1 hour at 100ºC. On cooling, 0.5 ml of saturated sodium bicarbonate and 1.5 ml of hexane were added to the solution, thus creating two layers. The upper, organic layer was removed and transferred into a new lipid-clean vial. Finally, the solution was blown dry under N2, and hexane (0.5 ml) was added to each vial. Samples were then sealed and loaded into a HP 6890 GC-FID equipped with a 7683 autosampler, for FA identification and quantification. Briefly, the column temperature was initially set at 65°C and held for 0.5 min. The temperature was raised to 195°C at a rate of 40°C min-1, held for 15 min, and then to a final temperature of 220°C at a rate of 2°C min-1, held for 0.75 min. Hydrogen was the carrier gas, which flowed at a rate of 2 ml min-1. The injector temperature started at 150°C and then raised to a final temperature of 250°C, at a rate of 120°C min-1. The detector temperature remained constant at 260°C. Peaks were identified comparing retention times from standards purchased from Supelco, including 37 component FAME mix (Product number 47885-U), Bacterial acid methyl ester mix (47080-U), PUFA 1 (product 47033) and PUFA 3 (47085-U). In this study, FA were reported as sums, whereas individual proportions may be found in Parzanini (unpublished; S4 Table). In detail, the sum of the saturated (∑Sat) was measured by summing the proportions of the following FA: 14:0, trimethyltridecanoic acid, 15:0, pristanic acid, 16:0, phytanic acid, 17:0, 18:0, 19:0, 20:0, 21:0, 22:0, 23:0, and 24:0. The sum of the monounsaturated FA (∑MUFA) was obtained by summing 14:1, 15:1, 16:1n-11, 16:1n-9, 16:1n-7, 16:1n-5, 17:1, 18:1n-11, 18:1n-9, 18:1n-7, 18:1n-6, 18:1n-5, 20:1n-11(13), 20:1n-9, 20:1n-7, 22:1n-11(13), 22:1n-9, 22:1n-7, and 24:1; whereas the polyunsaturated 16:2n-4, 16:3n-3?, 16:4n-3?, 16:4n-1, 18:2a, 18:2b, 18:2n-6, 18:2n-4, 18:3n-6, 18:3n-4, 18:3n-3, 18:4n-3, 18:4n-1?, 18:5n-3, 20:2α?, 20:2β?, 20:2n-6, 20:3n-6, 20:4n-6, 20:3n-3, 20:4n-3, 20:5n-3, 21:5n-3?, 22:4n-6, 22:5n-6, 22:4n-3?, 22:5n-3, 22:6n-3, and the non-methylene-interrupted-dienoic 22:2 (i.e. 22:2NIMDa?, 22:2NIMDb?) were summed to calculate ∑PUFA. For the sum of the n-3 and n-6 FA, only those acids involved in the desaturation/elongation pathway were used, including 18:3n-3, 18:4n-3, 20:4n-3, 20:5n-3, 22:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 for ∑n-3, and 18:2n-6 18:3n-6, 20:3n-6, 20:4n-6, 22:4n-6 and 22:5n-6 for ∑n-6. Lastly, DHA+EPA represents the sum of the amounts of docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) and eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) reported in g per 100-g of wet mass.

Statistical analysis

Two types of mean values were reported in Results and Tables: i) averages per phylum ± se and ii) averages per species ± sd; and phyla are listed in decreasing order of mean lipid contents in the Results as well as in the Tables. To study the relative magnitude of data variability among and within phyla, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for selected metrics (i.e. wet mass, total lipid content, and proportions of PL, FFA, ST, TAG, WE/SE). Due to analytical artifacts related to blank correction and the consequent underestimation of the proportion of PL in individuals with low lipid content, n = 28 samples were removed from all the analyses involving lipid class composition (Table 1). Based on non-normal data distributions and heterogeneity of variances, Spearman rank correlations were run to test for the presence of any relationship among depth of collection (mean value for each depth strata), total lipid content, lipid classes (PL, FFA, ST, TAG, and WE/SE), lipid ratios (TAG:ST and PL:ST), fatty acid indices (∑Sat, ∑MUFA, ∑PUFA, ∑n-3, ∑n-6), and wet mass of whole individuals. Furthermore, PERMANOVA (permutational multivariate ANOVA) and PCO (principal coordinate analysis) were performed to explore differences in lipid and FA composition across taxa. Specifically, a 1-factor PERMANOVA was initially run to test which factor, among “Phylum”, “Class”, or “Species” better explained the variability across organisms in terms of lipid class and FA composition. As “Phylum” was the best descriptor, a 2-factor PERMANOVA was subsequently performed to assess whether and to what extent “Depth”, in addition to “Phylum”, influenced the variability. Univariate analyses were run using the software Sigmaplot 11.0, and multivariate statistics was conducted in Primer 6 + PERMANOVA [48].

Ethical approval

Field collections were performed by the Canadian Government's Fisheries and Oceans under their rules, regulations and permits.

Results

Lipid and FA composition across phyla

Lipid analysis was performed on deep-sea organisms across a wide range of taxa, body masses and depths (Table 1), and inside a tight temporal and geographical window. Representatives of the phyla Chordata and Arthropoda exhibited the highest mean concentrations of total lipids in their tissues, with marked variability (± se: Table 2). In particular, the Chordata displayed both the greatest lipid amounts (56.0 ± 12.1 mg g-1 wm, n = 105) and highest CV (221%), followed by Arthropoda (24.8 ± 9.0 mg g-1 wm, n = 32; 206%). Conversely, the Porifera (5.9 ± 0.7 mg g-1 wm, n = 25) and the Sipuncula (5.1 ± 2.2 mg g-1 wm, n = 2) contained the lowest lipid quantities. Lipid contents of all remaining taxa along with CVs are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Wet mass and lipid profiles in deep-sea macrofauna phyla under study.

Sample number (n), and mean values of wet mass, total lipids, and mean proportion of phospholipids (PL), free fatty acids (FFA), sterols (ST), triacylglycerols (TAG), wax esters or steryl esters (WE/SE). Coefficients of variation (CV; %) are also reported for each mean value, as well as grand means related to each variable.

PhylumnWet massTotal lipidsPL FFA ST TAG WE/SE
  g±seCVmg g-1 wm±seCV%±seCV%±seCV%±seCV%±seCV%±seCV
Chordata105186.0±36.720256.0±12.122124.7±2.18520.5±1.67911.0±0.98424.9±2.71133.7±1.1311
Arthropoda326.2±1.614624.8±9.020631.7±3.86825.1±2.65915.2±1.6587.3±2.31808.8±3.1199
Echinodermata3516.2±3.512914.3±3.615145.6±3.44414.7±1.56114.3±1.4587.1±1.91550.1±0.0297
Annelida91.8±0.58510.1±1.85338.2±6.34921.6±4.76521.5±4.9686.8±2.81233.5±2.3193
Cnidaria2516.9±5.21549.8±1.99828.5±3.15420.1±2.45912.2±0.9375.4±1.412812.7±1.871
Mollusca23172.4±70.01956.4±0.64466.4±2.82015.0±1.95916.9±1.1310.4±0.3288- 
Porifera2573.3±25.61745.9±0.75945.6±3.74117.6±1.64517.9±1.2355.3±1.11073.2±1.2181
Sipuncula22.8±0.8395.1±2.25952.8±16.4445.1±2.87935.9±14.858-- 
Mean CV  141 111 51 63 54 156 209

Wet mass and lipid profiles in deep-sea macrofauna phyla under study.

Sample number (n), and mean values of wet mass, total lipids, and mean proportion of phospholipids (PL), free fatty acids (FFA), sterols (ST), triacylglycerols (TAG), wax esters or steryl esters (WE/SE). Coefficients of variation (CV; %) are also reported for each mean value, as well as grand means related to each variable. A total of 14 lipid classes were represented within the faunal assemblage. Overall, PL (35.3 ± 1.5%), FFA (19.4 ± 0.9%), ST (13.9 ± 0.6%), TAG (13.4 ± 1.3%), and WE/SE (4.3 ± 0.7%) were the most abundant lipid classes across all individuals analyzed (n = 256). The remaining lipid classes (i.e. HC, EE, ME, EK, MK, GE, AL, DAG, and AMPL) occurred in smaller mean proportions (< 1.7%) and, for this reason, they were not further considered in the analysis; nonetheless, their proportions within each phylum is reported in S1 Table of the Supplementary Material. PL dominated the lipid class composition of all phyla analyzed, with mean proportions ranging from 24.7 ± 2.1% in the Chordata to 66.4 ± 2.8% in the Mollusca (Table 2). FFA and ST were similarly detected in all the phyla, although to a generally lower extent than PL, ranging from 5.1 ± 2.8% in the Sipuncula to 25.1 ± 2.6% in the Arthropoda, for the former, and from 11.0 ± 0.9% in the Chordata to 35.9 ± 14.8% in the Sipuncula, for the latter (Table 2). While the Chordata had high levels of TAG in their tissues, i.e. 24.9 ± 2.7, this lipid class was less abundant in the other phyla (< 8%), and it was absent in the Sipuncula (Table 2). WE/SE were detected in all phyla except for the Mollusca and Sipuncula, with the Arthropoda and Cnidaria having the highest mean proportions (8.8 ± 3.1 and 12.7 ± 1.8%, respectively; Table 2). Overall, the lipid class composition varied significantly among phyla and depths at collection (PERMANOVA, Pseudo-F = 4.8, p(perm) = 0.0001, with “Phylum” as factor; Pseudo-F = 1.4, p(perm) = 0.0031, with “Depth” as factor; and Pseudo-F = 1.4, p(perm) = 0.0031, “Depth X Phylum” as factor). PL and TAG influenced PCO1, which accounted for 50.9% of the variation among samples (Fig 1). In addition, the mean CV measured for TAG and WE/SE was higher (> 150%) than that measured for PL, FFA, and ST (Table 2). Regarding the lipid ratios, the condition index TAG:ST ranged from values close to 0 in the Mollusca, Porifera, and Annelida, to 7.7 ± 1.6 in the Chordata. Despite the low values of the index, Mollusca also displayed the highest CV (Table 3). Conversely, results for the PL:ST were less variable across taxa overall, and values ranged from 1.8 ± 0.4 in the Annelida to 4.5 ± 0.5 in the Mollusca (Table 3).
Fig 1

Principal coordinate (PCO) analysis plot representing differences in terms of lipid class composition across phyla.

The lipid classes reported occurred with proportions > 1.7%, including phospholipids (PL), free fatty acids (FFA), sterols (ST), triacylglycerols (TAG), and wax esters/steryl esters (WE/SE).

Table 3

Lipid class ratios across phyla.

Mean values ±se of triacyglycerols to sterols (TAG:ST) ratio and phospholipids to sterols (PL:ST) ratio reported for each phylum, together with corresponding coefficients of variation (CV; %).

PhylumTAG:STPL:ST
 Mean±seCVMean±seCV
Chordata7.7±1.62033.2±0.5147
Arthropoda1.3±0.62503.7±0.8127
Echinodermata0.9±0.31734.0±0.572
Annelida0.5±0.21281.8±0.466
Cnidaria0.6±0.21412.5±0.353
Mollusca0.0±0.03254.5±0.549
Porifera0.3±0.11553.1±0.462
Sipuncula--2.0±1.391
Mean CV 196 83

Principal coordinate (PCO) analysis plot representing differences in terms of lipid class composition across phyla.

The lipid classes reported occurred with proportions > 1.7%, including phospholipids (PL), free fatty acids (FFA), sterols (ST), triacylglycerols (TAG), and wax esters/steryl esters (WE/SE).

Lipid class ratios across phyla.

Mean values ±se of triacyglycerols to sterols (TAG:ST) ratio and phospholipids to sterols (PL:ST) ratio reported for each phylum, together with corresponding coefficients of variation (CV; %). Mean proportions (±se) of saturated FA (∑Sat) ranged from 14.9 ± 1.3% in the Echinodermata to 26.9 ± 2.1% in the Mollusca, and unsaturated FA (∑MUFA and ∑PUFA) were generally higher than saturated FA in all phyla, except Mollusca (Table 4). In fact, this phylum was characterized by lower mean proportions of ∑MUFA than those of ∑Sat and ∑PUFA, as shown in Table 4. Regarding the essential FA, mean levels of ∑n-3 were higher overall (from 11.7 ± 2.0% in the Porifera to 42.4 ± 2.8% in the Mollusca) than those of ∑n-6 (from 2.1 ± 0.5% in the Porifera to 14.4 ± 1.8% in the Echinodermata). Overall, the FA composition was significantly different across phyla (PERMANOVA, Pseudo-F = 9.6, p(perm) = 0.0001, with “Phylum” as factor; Pseudo-F = 1.2, p(perm) = 0.1614, with “Depth” as factor; and Pseudo-F = 1.2, p(perm) = 0.1782, “Depth X Phylum” as factor), and ∑MUFA and ∑PUFA influenced PCO1, which accounted for 72.0% of the variation among samples (Fig 2). In particular, pairwise comparisons indicated that both the Annelida, Arthropoda, and Chordata were significantly different from the Echinodermata, Mollusca, and Porifera (p(perm) < 0.05); the Cnidaria and Echinodermata were significantly different from the Mollusca and Porifera instead (p(perm) = 0.0001); and, lastly, the Mollusca significantly differed from the Porifera and Sipuncula (p(perm) < 0.05). Representatives of the phylum Chordata presented the highest mean concentrations of DHA+EPA in their tissues (0.5 ± 0.1 g per 100-g wm), followed by those belonging to the phyla Arthropoda, Mollusca, and Echinodermata (0.2 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.1 g per 100-g wm, respectively; Table 4). In general, the average CV measured for all the FA indices was <50%, with the only exceptions being those calculated for ∑n-6 and DHA+EPA, which were ≥85% (Table 4).
Table 4

Fatty acid sums characterizing the phyla under study.

Sample number (n), mean value ±se and related coefficient of variation (CV; %) of the sum of saturated (∑Sat), monounsaturated (∑MUFA), polyunsaturated (∑PUFA), n-3 and n-6 FA, as well as DHA+EPA are reported for each phylum.

Phylumn∑Sat ∑MUFA ∑PUFA ∑n-3 ∑n-6 DHA+EPA
  %±seCV%±seCV%±seCV%±seCV%±seCVg per 100 g wm±seCV
Chordata11522.4±0.73442.0±1.74433.9±1.34227.7±1.3493.7±0.3760.5±0.1179
Arthropoda3516.5±1.24443.8±1.62237.3±1.32130.4±1.7323.5±0.61060.2±0.081
Echinodermata3614.9±1.35243.1±1.52140.3±1.62418.6±1.44614.4±1.8740.2±0.1149
Annelida920.4±1.32038.8±2.11639.5±2.62027.6±2.7294.6±0.6390.1±0.059
Cnidaria3517.6±0.93044.4±1.62135.4±1.62721.4±1.64410.0±1.5910.1±0.0166
Mollusca2326.9±2.13719.3±1.02553.2±2.11942.4±2.8325.4±1.21080.2±0.079
Porifera2420.8±2.25150.3±3.23120.8±3.78611.7±2.0852.1±0.51150.04±0.0118
Sipuncula226.7±3.31736.3±12.24834.0±16.36812.0±7.3868.2±4.1700.03±0.0132
Mean CV 36 29 38 50 85 120
Fig 2

Principal coordinate (PCO) analysis plot representing differences in terms of FA composition across phyla.

The sums of saturated- (∑ Sat), monounsaturated- (∑ MUFA), and polyunsaturated FA (∑ PUFA), are reported together with the sums of n-3 and n-6 FA (∑ n-3 and ∑ n-6, respectively).

Principal coordinate (PCO) analysis plot representing differences in terms of FA composition across phyla.

The sums of saturated- (∑ Sat), monounsaturated- (∑ MUFA), and polyunsaturated FA (∑ PUFA), are reported together with the sums of n-3 and n-6 FA (∑ n-3 and ∑ n-6, respectively).

Fatty acid sums characterizing the phyla under study.

Sample number (n), mean value ±se and related coefficient of variation (CV; %) of the sum of saturated (∑Sat), monounsaturated (∑MUFA), polyunsaturated (∑PUFA), n-3 and n-6 FA, as well as DHA+EPA are reported for each phylum. While ST negatively correlated with total lipid contents (r = -0.6, n = 256, p = 0.000), both TAG and the TAG:ST ratio positively correlated with total lipid amounts (TAG, r = 0.6, n = 256, p = 0.000; TAG:ST, r = 0.7, n = 250, p = 0.000). Although no significant relationship was detected between total lipid content and wet mass, ST negatively correlated with wet mass (r = -0.2, n = 256, p = 0.004). Although weak, significant correlations were found between depth and various metrics. Specifically, depth correlated positively with total lipid content (r = 0.2, n = 256, p = 0.001); wet mass (r = 0.2, n = 256, p = 0.001); PL:ST (r = 0.1, n = 238, p = 0.026) and ∑MUFA (r = 0.2, n = 270, p = 0.002). In contrast, it correlated negatively with FFA (r = -0.2, n = 256, p = 0.009); ST (r = -0.2, n = 256, p = 0.000); and ∑n-6 (r = -0.2, n = 270, p = 0.003).

Lipid and fatty acid composition within phyla

Chordata

Overall, representatives of this phylum were characterized by the highest mean levels of lipids in their tissues, as well as the greatest mean proportions of TAG. Lipid data were highly variable across the taxa in the Chordata, with CV of mean values being ≥ 113% for both total lipid content and TAG (Table 2). Ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) showed higher amounts of lipid in their tissues than sharks (Chondrichthyes) and tunicates (Ascidiacea), with values ranging from 2.1 ± 1.1 mg g-1 wm in Gaidropsarus ensis, to 569.0 ± 417.0 mg g-1 wm in Chiasmodon niger (Table 1). Ray-finned fish also had a different lipid class composition, with high proportions of TAG, up to 82.9 ± 6.2% in C. niger (S2 Table). In contrast, PL was the prevailing lipid class in the muscle tissue of sharks and ascidians, and with ST representing an important fraction in the body wall of the latter (≥ 23.7 ± 9.5%; S2 Table). Although the phylum was characterized overall by low levels of WE/SE, the fish Arctozenus risso, Borostomias antarcticus, Caristius macropus, Lampadena speculigera, and Lampanyctus spp. presented proportions of this lipid classes > 17% (S2 Table). Conversely, variation in fatty acid data was smaller, and the Chordata showed similar proportions of most FA indices, except for ∑n-6 where CVs reached 76% (Table 4). In detail, mean values of ∑n-6 ranged from 1.3% in Oneroides macrosteus to 12.8 ± 2.1% in Ascidiacea sp. 4 (S3 Table). Tunicates were in general characterized by higher mean levels of n-6 FA in their tissues, whereas sharks had larger proportions of PUFA and n-3, and ray-finned fish of ∑Sat (S3 Table).

Arthropoda

Malacostraca crustaceans had higher levels of lipids in their tissues than Pycnogonida and Hexanauplia representatives (Table 1). Furthermore, most of lipids of these crustaceans was represented by WE/SE, as in Acanthephyra pelagica, Anonyx spp., and Gnathophausia zoea where this lipid class accounted for > 38% in (S2 Table). Conversely, the lipid profile of both Pycnogonida and Hexanauplia was mainly composed of PL and ST, with the former group also having high proportions of FFA (S2 Table). In addition, WE/SE was either absent or present at trace levels within Pycnogonida and Hexanauplia (≤ 0.2 ± 0.3%), whereas TAG occurred in higher mean proportions (≥ 11.2 ± 3.0%). Mean proportions of FA indices were similar overall within the phylum, with CV <45%, with the exception of ∑n-6 whose CV was 106% (Table 4). In detail, the two species in the genus Anonyx presented the lowest proportions of ∑n-6 (0.8 and 0.7%) versus 10.1 ± 11.3% in Steromastis sculpta (S3 Table). Overall, decapods, such as S. sculpta, Pandalus borealis, and Notostomus robustus, displayed the highest levels of ∑Sat and PUFA within the phylum.

Echinodermata

Echinoderms had relatively high amounts of lipids in their tissue (Table 2), dominated by PL (45.6 ± 3.4%). WE/SE were present only at trace levels in the sea star Astropecten americanus, the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus pallidus, and the brittle star Ophiopholis aculeata, whereas TAG was detected in most of the species, with particularly high mean proportions in the brittle stars Ophiopholis aculeata and Ophioscolex glacialis (S2 Table). While CVs of mean levels of ∑MUFA, ∑PUFA, and ∑n-3 was < 50% across echinoderms, greater variation was found for ∑Sat and ∑n-6 (Table 4). In fact, whereas proportions of ∑Sat ranged between 6.6% and 27.9%; levels of ∑n-6 ranged between 0.9 ± 0.9% and 29.5% (S3 Table).

Annelida

The Annelida had intermediate amounts of lipids (10.1 ± 1.8 mg g-1 wm), which were mostly represented by PL, FFA, and ST (Table 2); nonetheless, both TAG (6.8 ± 2.8%) and WE/SE (3.5 ± 2.3%) were also detected. In particular, Polynoidae sp 3 and Alitta succinea respectively had the highest proportions of TAG and WE/SE within the phylum. Proportions of saturated, unsaturated, n-3 and n-6 FA were similar overall across the Annelida. Mean levels of MUFA and PUFA were higher than those of ∑Sat, and proportions of ∑n-3 were larger than those of ∑n-6 (Table 4).

Cnidaria

In general, the Cnidaria had low amounts of lipids in their tissues, although results were variable (CV = 98%; Table 2). The highest total lipid contents were found in sea pens (class Anthozoa) such as Anthoptilum grandiflorum and Umbellula sp. (35.4 and 31.1 mg g-1 wm, respectively), whereas lipid levels in jellyfishes (Scyphozoa) were low at 2.0 ± 0.9 mg g-1 wm. Together with PL, FFA, and ST, WE/SE represented a significant fraction across cnidarians, with mean percentages of 12.7 ± 1.8% (Table 2), and the lipid class was particularly abundant in the corals Paragorgia arborea and Umbellula sp., as well as in the jellyfish Periphyllia periphyllia (S2 Table). Proportions of WE/SE were generally higher than those of TAG (Table 2). While proportions of ∑Sat, ∑MUFA, ∑PUFA and ∑n-3 were similar across the Cnidaria, marked variation was noted for ∑n-6, especially within the class Anthozoa (S3 Table). The sea anemone Actinauge cristata had the lowest levels of n-6 FA in its tissue (0.3 ± 0.1%), and the soft coral Duva florida had the largest proportions (40.4%).

Mollusca

The low mean value of lipid content was somewhat consistent across the Mollusca, with a CV of 44%. Likewise, the lipid class composition was similar among the species analyzed in this group with PL the most abundant lipid class, occurring with percentages > 53%. Furthermore, no WE/SE were detected and TAG levels were low and measured only in the body wall of the cephalopods Illex coindetii and Neorossia caroli, and in the gastropod Arrhoges occidentalis (S2 Table). Levels of ∑Sat, ∑MUFA, ∑PUFA, and ∑n-3 were similar across species, with CV < 40% and ∑n-6 showing the greatest variability (Table 4) from 0.5% in the cephalopod Rossia megaptera to 16.7 ± 5.4% in gastropods of the genus Colus (S2 Table).

Porifera

Sponges were characterized overall by a low lipid content (5.9 ± 0.7 mg g-1 wm), with PL representing the largest fraction (45.6 ± 3.7%). Most of the variability among species was detected in TAG and WE/SE, with TAG presenting higher mean proportions in demosponges, and WE/SE in glass sponges (S2 Table). Levels of PUFA, and n-3 and n-6 FA were highly variable across species (Table 4). In particular, the Hexactinellida had higher levels of PUFA than the Demospongiae, but the demosponge Tentorium semisuberites had the highest proportions of n-3 and n-6 FA in its tissue (30.7 and 6.8%, respectively).

Sipuncula

This phylum was represented by 2 species (Table 1). The Sipuncula had the lowest mean quantities of lipids among all the phyla analyzed (5.1±2.2 mg g-1 wm; Table 2), and most of these lipids were represented by PL, FFA, and ST; no TAG and WE/SE were detected in their tissues (Table 2). The 2 species of Sipuncula generally had higher mean levels of unsaturated FA, whereas those of ∑n-3 and ∑n-6 were similar (Table 4).

Discussion

The present study explored a broad assemblage of 139 deep-sea species distributed across 8 phyla, which were collected within a tight spatial and temporal window along shelf and slope areas off Newfoundland, in the Northwest Atlantic. This sampling strategy was purposely adopted to minimize environmentally-driven variability in lipid content and composition, as well as to facilitate the comparative study of these parameters across taxa. Furthermore, tissues characterized by low turnover rates, and thought to incorporate longer-term data, were sampled from each taxon to reduce variability among tissue types and to optimize comparisons. When collection of these tissues was not feasible, due to the small size of certain taxa, entire organisms were processed instead to allow for lipid extraction [44]. While only a small proportion of individuals was analyzed as whole bodies (8%), comparisons involving representatives of the species Alitta succinea, Nereididae sp. 1, Polychaeta sp. 1, Polynoidae sp. 3, and Prionospio sp. (phylum Annelida); Arcoscalpellum michelottianum and Nymphon sp. (phylum Arthropoda); Ascidiacea sp. 3, and Eudistoma vitreum (phylum Chordata); and Gorgonocephalus sp. and Ophioscolex glacialis (Echinodermata) may have been less comparable with those from other taxa. As the phylum Sipuncula was represented by only 2 individuals, results for this taxon remain tentative. Nevertheless, they were still included in the analyses given the rarity and scientific value of deep-water samples. As expected, there were marked differences in lipid content and composition both across the highest taxonomic groups (i.e. inter-phyla), as well as within phyla and within/among some of the lower taxonomic levels. Part of these differences may have been a reflection of phylogenetic diversity, as the PL composition of marine organisms is mostly driven by phylogeny [49] and PL represented the most abundant lipid fraction across the taxa analyzed. However, in the present study, most of the variability in lipid amounts appeared to be related to the lipid classes TAG and WE/SE (see paragraph below for assumptions and interpretations made for WE/SE), which also exhibited the largest coefficient of variation. In fact, both these lipid classes were positively correlated with total lipid content. As TAG and WE/SE are typical storage lipids in marine organisms [21, 26], such variability most likely reflects the different energy allocation strategies (i.e. how energy is distributed towards growth, survival, and reproduction) characterizing the taxa analyzed. Indeed, not all taxa accumulated energy reserves: the Mollusca and Sipuncula, whose lipid class composition was dominated by membrane lipids (i.e. PL+ST), had trace levels of storage lipids (TAG+WE/SE). Among those that did accumulate lipid stores, different lipid classes (e.g. TAG vs WE/SE) were used. For instance, whereas the Chordata and Echinodermata had relatively high proportions of TAG, the Cnidaria accumulated their energy storage in WE/SE instead. Lastly, representatives of the Arthropoda, Annelida, and Porifera used both TAG and WE/SE to store energy. As previously shown by Lockyer [50], Fraser [26], and Lloret and Planes [51], lipid content and composition of organisms may fluctuate on broad scales according to foraging and storage modes, metabolism (e.g. low vs fast), reproductive strategies, environmental conditions, and food availability. Regarding the latter, studies suggest that high spatial and temporal variability in food supply selects for larger proportions of storage lipids [52]. At the intraspecific level, age, size, and sex may also play a role [26, 53]. Indeed, the size of organisms analyzed in the current investigation was highly variable within species, although no significant correlation was found overall between wet mass and lipid content and lipid class composition; whereas age and sex were not determined. A positive correlation was detected, in the current study, between total lipid content and the condition index TAG:ST, suggesting that the fattier individuals were characterized by greater energy reserves than their conspecifics. This is mostly the case for the representatives of phylum Chordata, which had the highest variability in TAG:ST among and within species, as in Notoscopelus spp. and Reinhardtius hippoglossoides. In fact, as previously reported for shallow-water fish [51], corals [54], crustaceans [55], and bivalve larvae [26], the higher the lipid content and energy reserves within the representatives of these taxa, the higher their growth rate, reproductive success, or survival. The same idea may be applied to deep-sea organisms, taking into account that their metabolic rates and lipid stores are typically lower than in their shallow-water counterparts, and hence the way the energy is partitioned among somatic growth, reproduction, and survival may be different [52]. Certain crustaceans, fish, jellyfishes, and corals analyzed in this study used WE, rather than TAG, as the main form of energy storage. Although most terrestrial and aquatic organisms store energy in TAG [1], these crustaceans, fish, jellyfishes, and corals had greater levels of WE and/or SE, which could not be fully distinguished (S2 Table). Among them, the crustaceans Acanthephyra pelagica, Anonyx spp., and Gnathophausia zoea, the fish Lampanyctus spp., Caristius macropus, and Arctozenus risso, the jellyfishes Atolla wyvellei and Periphylla peryphylla, and the corals Paragorgia arborea and Umbellula sp. showed proportions of WE/SE >20% up to 60%. No indication was found in the literature about SE accumulation in these taxa. Whereas the technique applied in the current study did not allow for the separation of these two classes, Kayama et al. [56] found that proportions of SE were consistently smaller relative to those of WE in the roe of various shallow-water fish species, and Nevenzel [57] indicated that small amounts of SE are typically present in animal tissues. Therefore, the high proportion of WE/SE was assumed to mostly correspond to WE, which are known to play an important role as both energy storage and in buoyancy control [21, 25]. Deep-water zooplankton and fish were previously shown to accumulate large quantities of WE within their tissues [21, 58]. In particular, polar and sub-polar herbivorous zooplankton (e.g. copepods) accumulated large quantities of WE over summer, and used these lipids to store energy during long periods of starvation and to maintain neutral buoyancy at depths > 500 m [21, 59]. While TAG are used as a short-term deposit, WE provide a longer-term energy provision to such zooplankton overwintering at great depths [21]. Furthermore, the use of WE for buoyancy control is beneficial for zooplankton living in cold deep waters, due to the thermal expansion and compressibility of such molecules [59]. As for cold-water corals, the only study providing evidence of storage via WE is that conducted by Hamoutene et al. [19] within the same region of the Northwest Atlantic during the same season. Hamoutene et al. [19] proposed that corals stored their energy in WE, as well as in alkyldiacylglycerols. Here, the proportion of alkyldiacylglycerols (or glyceryl ethers) across all the Cnidaria species was minimal (0.05 ± 0.05%; S1 Table), hence not considered in the analysis. Conversely, they showed higher levels of TAG (S1 Table), suggesting these species may use both TAG and WE for energy storage as reported in shallow-water corals [19]. While herbivorous zooplankton are able to synthesize WE de novo [21], higher-level consumers can accumulate this lipid by incorporating it through diet [58]. It is likely that the crustaceans, jellyfishes, corals, and fish presenting larger levels of WE in the current investigation hence preyed on WE-rich zooplankton. Depth was an important driver of lipid content and composition of the species analyzed in this study, and the environmental conditions at sampling might also have contributed to the variability in their lipid levels. Although sampling was carried out within a tight geographical radius (100 km), organisms were collected along a depth range of ~1000 m. Representatives of the phyla Mollusca and Echinodermata, for instance, which presented the highest PL:ST ratios, were collected between 464 and 1407 m and between 313 and 1407 m, respectively. According to Cossins and Macdonald [18] and Simonato et al. [60], environmental variables such as temperature and pressure may modulate lipid content and composition, and both these parameters vary along a bathymetric gradient [61]. Positive correlations were detected here between depth and the PL:ST ratio, an indicator of membrane lipid remodeling [1], as well as between depth and proportions of MUFA. However, depth negatively correlated with ST. These results suggest that both ST and unsaturated FA are involved in the bathymetric response and, specifically, that the species collected at deeper depths have overall higher levels of lipid unsaturation, mainly due to MUFA and a lower ST content. Decreasing temperature and increasing pressure along the depth gradient has the ability to reduce membrane fluidity, thus compromising its general structure and function [22, 46, 60]. In response, organisms may adjust and remodel the lipid composition of their membranes, through a process known as homeoviscous adaptation, which involves changes in the cholesterol content, as well as changes in length and unsaturation levels of the membrane FA and in phospholipid headgroups and molecular species [22, 60, 62]. Specifically, cholesterol, the main form of ST in most animals [16], generally favours packing in the membranes, increasing their rigidity [22]. In contrast, long-chain unsaturated FA are characterized by a higher molecular flexibility and lower melting points, thus providing more fluidity to membranes [63]. Direct evidence of this type of lipid remodelling was documented in shallow-water bivalves [47], as well as in deep-water microorganisms [64]. It was also suspected to occur in fish collected between 200 and 4000 m; specifically, deeper-water species were displayed higher levels of unsaturation than shallow-water ones [18]. Interestingly, included in the present dataset were species known to undergo diel vertical migration, such as the myctophid fish Lampanyctus spp. and Myctophum sp. [65] and the crustacean decapod Acanthephyra pelagica [66]. Since these species can travel vertically over a few hundred meters [66], thus experiencing marked changes in temperature and pressure, it would be of particular interest to undertake a study to assess their ability to overcome such variations in terms of membrane lipid composition. Pernet et al. [67] found that while the level of unsaturation was adjusted in response to both long- and short-term acclimation to temperature fluctuations in the shallow-water oyster Crassostrea virginica, the modulation of the PL:ST ratio was only accomplished in response to long-term acclimation. Hazel and Landrey [68] noted that the modulation of phospholipid molecular species and headgroups preceded the adjustment of the unsaturation level in the rapid thermal acclimation of the rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri, it would be valuable to verify whether deep-sea species have the same time course for thermal acclimation. In the present study, FA composition was more consistent across phyla than the lipid class composition and this, probably, was mostly driven by phylogeny, in accordance with Dalsgaard et al. [69]. In addition, higher proportions of unsaturated vs saturated FA were measured here, as well as higher levels of ∑n-3 vs ∑n-6 FA, which followed initial expectations. The high level of unsaturation within organism tissues was likely driven by low temperatures and high pressures characteristic of cold and deep-water environments [11, 64], as discussed above. In addition, certain PUFA (e.g. n-3 FA) are known key dietary components that are required by aquatic organisms for optimal health, both in shallow [5] and deeper waters [70]. Such essential FA are, for example, involved in cell synthesis, neural development, somatic growth, membrane function and structure, reproduction, ionic regulation, and immune function in aquatic organisms [5, 28, 60]. In particular, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3), and arachidonic acid (ARA, 20:4n-6) are all of primary importance for marine species [5], although the extent to which these essential FA occur within organisms may vary [3, 71]. Typically, ARA occurs in lower proportions than EPA and DHA, due to the availability of these FA as dietary sources. The present study was consistent with the literature; although values of individual FA were not provided in the current study, proportions of n-6 FA were up to 9 times lower (e.g. in the Arthropoda) than those of n-3 FA. Species of the phyla Chordata and Arthropoda represented the most important reservoir of essential nutrients within the faunal assemblage analyzed. Marine organisms, fish in particular, are known to be a major source of PUFA, such as n-3 FA [28, 72, 73]. Marine species containing higher levels of n-3:n-6 FA, PUFA, and DHA+EPA are hence recommended for human consumption, due to their high nutritional value [32, 72]. Furthermore, as DHA, EPA, and to a lesser extent ARA, are likewise largely required by marine organisms and have to be gained through diet [5], feeding habits of marine organisms might be driven by their nutritional needs. In other words, PUFA and essential FA are required at every trophic level and are highly conserved in marine food webs [73]. However, the transfer of these compounds throughout the food web is uneven, and depends on the biochemical and physiological requirements of each taxon [73]. In the present investigation, taking into account that only certain tissues were analyzed for each taxon (see Material and Methods), the Chordata, Arthropoda, and Mollusca had the largest proportions of n-3 FA, while the Chordata, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, and Mollusca had the highest concentrations of DHA+EPA, and the Mollusca and had the highest levels of PUFA. Since neither eggs nor larvae were sampled here, these results suggest that later life stage representatives (juveniles/adults) of these phyla may all constitute important reservoirs of nutrients. However, the overall lipid content of the Echinodermata and Mollusca was relatively low and, therefore, the provision of PUFA and essential FA from these phyla may be limited. In contrast, the Chordata and Arthropoda presented the highest lipid levels in their tissues and, for the same mass, they hence represent a greater reservoir of nutrients than Mollusca. The lack of any significant correlation between total lipid content and wet mass strengthens this result. At the species level, the fish Coryphaenoides rupestris and Gaidropsarus ensis, as well as the crustacean Notostomus robustus, presented the largest levels of essential FA in their tissues, and hence constitute key stores of nutrients among the species analyzed in the Northwest Atlantic. These species are widely distributed in the area [74], although the population of C. rupestris underwent drastic declines over the last few decades, due to commercial exploitation [74]. As a side note, the vertically migrating species Lampanyctus spp., A. pelagica, P. borealis, and N. robustus, included within the Chordata and Arthropoda, were also characterized by high levels of ∑Sat. Since ∑Sat are nutritionally important as a source of energy to consumers [75], these migrating species may play a key role in enhancing the transfer of both essential nutrients and energy between shallow and deeper ecosystems. Because of the small amount of samples required and the value of the information provided, lipid analysis has supported the investigation of still-poorly-known deep-sea fauna and ecosystems of different oceanic regions, such as the Northeast Pacific [15, 16], Northeast Atlantic [17], and Antarctic [76]. The present study extends this dataset to deep-sea taxa of the Northwest Atlantic and additionally highlights some important findings: i) the wide range of total lipid content and composition suggests a great diversity across deep-sea taxa in terms of energy allocation strategies, which were partly associated with diversified deep-sea adaptations (e.g. migratory behaviors, buoyancy and metabolic needs), and with a variable food supply in the deep sea; ii) the type and amount of energy storage are reflective of habitat (pelagic vs demersal), as well as of the type of preferred food sources for certain deep-sea taxa (e.g. WE-rich zooplankton); iii) by modulating ST and FA composition, some species are presumably able to counteract the effect of temperature and pressure along the depth gradient; and finally, iv) representatives of the phyla Chordata and Arthropoda constitute a major reservoir of essential nutrients, and the migrating species included in the two taxa may play a crucial role in transferring these nutrients to deeper food webs.

Proportions of the remaining lipid classes across phyla.

Mean proportion % ±se of hydrocarbons (HC), ethyl ethers (EE), methyl esters (ME), ethyl ketones (EK), methyl ketones (MK), glyceryl ethers (GE), alcohols (ALC), diacylglycerols (DAG), and acetone-mobile polar lipids (AMPL) are reported from the phylum containing the highest amounts of lipids to the phylum characterized by the lowest contents. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Lipid class composition across the deep-sea taxa analyzed.

Mean proportion % ±sd of phospholipids (PL), free fatty acids (FFA), sterols (ST), triacylglycerols (TAG), wax esters/steryl esters (WE/SE), as well as triacyglycerols to sterols (TAG:ST) and phospholipids to sterols (PL:ST) ratios are reported for each species analyzed in this study. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

FA composition across the deep-sea taxa analyzed.

Mean value % ±sd of the sum of saturated FA (∑Sat), monounsaturated FA (∑MUFA), polyunsaturated FA (∑PUFA), n-3 FA (∑n-3), n-6 FA (∑n-6), and the sum of docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acids (DHA+EPA) are reported for each species studied. Material and method reports the list of the fatty acids considered in these sums. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Individual fatty acids (%) measured for all the individuals analyzed.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  15 in total

1.  Lipid remodeling in wild and selectively bred hard clams at low temperatures in relation to genetic and physiological parameters.

Authors:  Fabrice Pernet; Réjean Tremblay; Chantal Gionet; Thomas Landry
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Piezophilic adaptation: a genomic point of view.

Authors:  Francesca Simonato; Stefano Campanaro; Federico M Lauro; Alessandro Vezzi; Michela D'Angelo; Nicola Vitulo; Giorgio Valle; Douglas H Bartlett
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Biochemical function and ecological significance of novel bacterial lipids in deep-sea procaryotes.

Authors:  E F Delong; A A Yayanos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Adaptive changes in membrane lipids of barophilic bacteria in response to changes in growth pressure.

Authors:  Y Yano; A Nakayama; K Ishihara; H Saito
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Marine omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: Effects, mechanisms and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Philip C Calder
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-08-20

Review 6.  Fatty acids from lipids of marine organisms: molecular biodiversity, roles as biomarkers, biologically active compounds, and economical aspects.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Bergé; Gilles Barnathan
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.635

7.  Proximate composition, fatty acid and lipid class composition of the muscle from deep-sea teleosts and elasmobranchs.

Authors:  Hege M W Økland; Iren S Stoknes; Jannicke F Remme; Margareth Kjerstad; Marianne Synnes
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Lipid, sterols and fatty acid composition of abyssal holothurians and ophiuroids from the North-East Pacific Ocean: food web implications.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Drazen; Charles F Phleger; Michaela A Guest; Peter D Nichols
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Change in lipid composition in eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) exposed to constant or fluctuating temperature regimes.

Authors:  Fabrice Pernet; Sophie Gauthier-Clerc; Elise Mayrand
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 10.  Fatty acid trophic markers in the pelagic marine environment.

Authors:  Johanne Dalsgaard; Michael St John; Gerhard Kattner; Dörthe Müller-Navarra; Wilhelm Hagen
Journal:  Adv Mar Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.143

View more
  5 in total

1.  Large-Scale Evaluation of Major Soluble Macromolecular Components of Fish Muscle from a Conventional 1H-NMR Spectral Database.

Authors:  Feifei Wei; Minoru Fukuchi; Kengo Ito; Kenji Sakata; Taiga Asakura; Yasuhiro Date; Jun Kikuchi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Sterol Composition of Sponges, Cnidarians, Arthropods, Mollusks, and Echinoderms from the Deep Northwest Atlantic: A Comparison with Shallow Coastal Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Laura Carreón-Palau; Nurgül Şen Özdemir; Christopher C Parrish; Camilla Parzanini
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.118

3.  Bacterial precursors and unsaturated long-chain fatty acids are biomarkers of North-Atlantic deep-sea demosponges.

Authors:  Anna de Kluijver; Klaas G J Nierop; Teresa M Morganti; Martijn C Bart; Beate M Slaby; Ulrike Hanz; Jasper M de Goeij; Furu Mienis; Jack J Middelburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparative transcriptomic analysis of in situ and onboard fixed deep-sea limpets reveals sample preparation-related differences.

Authors:  Guoyong Yan; Yi Lan; Jin Sun; Ting Xu; Tong Wei; Pei-Yuan Qian
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-17

5.  Oogenesis and lipid metabolism in the deep-sea sponge Phakellia ventilabrum (Linnaeus, 1767).

Authors:  Vasiliki Koutsouveli; David Balgoma; Antonio Checa; Mikael Hedeland; Ana Riesgo; Paco Cárdenas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.