Literature DB >> 30418277

Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.

Magdalena Pilz1, Kevin Staats, Selma Tobudic, Ojan Assadian, Elisabeth Presterl, Reinhard Windhager, Johannes Holinka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most commonly identified pathogens responsible for orthopaedic implant infection is Staphylococcus epidermidis, which can form biofilms on surfaces. Currently, orthopaedic implants made of various surface materials are available, each with features influencing osseointegration, biocompatibility, and adherence of bacteria to the surface, which is the first step in biofilm formation. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effect of a high tribologic-resistant 2.5-µm zirconium nitride top coat on an antiallergic multilayer ceramic-covered cobalt-chromium-molybdenum surface on the formation of S. epidermidis biofilm compared with other commonly used smooth and rough orthopaedic implant surface materials. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) When evaluating the surfaces of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloy with a zirconium (Zr) nitride coating, a CoCrMo alloy without a coating, titanium alloy, a titanium alloy with a corundum-blasted rough surface, and stainless steel with a corundum-blasted rough surface, does a Zr coating reduce the number of colony-forming units of S. epidermidis in an in vitro setting? (2) Is there quantitatively less biofilm surface area on Zr-coated surfaces than on the other surfaces tested in this in vitro model?
METHODS: To determine bacterial adhesion, five different experimental implant surface discs were incubated separately with one of 31 different S. epidermidis strains each and subsequently sonicated. Twenty test strains were obtained from orthopaedic patients undergoing emergency hip prosthesis surgeries or revision of implant infection and 10 further strains were obtained from the skin of healthy individuals. Additionally, one reference strain, S. epidermidis DSM 3269, was tested. After serial dilutions, the number of bacteria was counted and expressed as colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL. For biofilm detection, discs were stained with 0.1% Safranin-O for 15 minutes, photographed, and analyzed with computer imaging software.
RESULTS: The lowest bacterial count was found in the CoCrMo + Zr surface disc (6.6 x 10 CFU/mL ± 4.6 x 10 SD) followed by the CoCrMo surface (1.1 x 10 CFU/mL ± 1.9 x 10 SD), the titanium surface (1.36 x 10 CFU/mL ± 1.8 x 10 SD), the rough stainless steel surface (2.65 x 10 CFU/mL ± 3.8 x 10 SD), and the rough titanium surface (2.1 x 10 CFU/mL ± 3.0 x 10 SD). The mean CFU count was lower for CoCrMo + Zr discs compared with the rough stainless steel surface (mean difference: 2.0 x 10, p = 0.021), the rough titanium alloy surface (mean difference: 1.4 x 10, p = 0.002), and the smooth titanium surface (mean difference: 7.0 x 10, p = 0.016). The results of biofilm formation quantification show that the mean covered area of the surface of the CoCrMo + Zr discs was 19% (± 16 SD), which was lower than CoCrMo surfaces (35% ± 23 SD), titanium alloy surface (46% ± 20 SD), rough titanium alloy surface (66% ± 23 SD), and rough stainless steel surface (58% ± 18 SD).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that a multilayer, ceramic-covered, CoCrMo surface with a 2.5-µm zirconium nitride top coat showed less S. epidermidis biofilm formation compared with other surface materials used for orthopaedic implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CoCrMo with a 2.5-µm zirconium nitride top coat seems to be a promising surface modification technology able to reduce bacterial attachment on the surface of an implant and, hence, may further prevent implant infection with S. epidermidis biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30418277      PMCID: PMC6370079          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

Review 1.  Biofilm formation: a clinically relevant microbiological process.

Authors:  R M Donlan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Philippa C Matthews; Anthony R Berendt; Martin A McNally; Ivor Byren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-29

4.  Cost of treating an infected total knee replacement.

Authors:  C K Hebert; R E Williams; R S Levy; R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cost analysis of debridement and retention for management of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  T N Peel; M M Dowsey; K L Buising; D Liew; P F M Choong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Mammalian cell growth versus biofilm formation on biomaterial surfaces in an in vitro post-operative contamination model.

Authors:  Guruprakash Subbiahdoss; Roel Kuijer; Henk J Busscher; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Definition of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Thorsten Gehrke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study.

Authors:  B Grössner-Schreiber; M Griepentrog; I Haustein; W D Müller; K P Lange; H Briedigkeit; U B Göbel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Bacterial biofilm formation versus mammalian cell growth on titanium-based mono- and bi-functional coating.

Authors:  G Subbiahdoss; B Pidhatika; G Coullerez; M Charnley; R Kuijer; H C van der Mei; M Textor; H J Busscher
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.942

10.  Quantitative in vivo biocompatibility of new ultralow-nickel cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys.

Authors:  Kazuaki Sonofuchi; Yoshihiro Hagiwara; Yuichiro Koizumi; Akihiko Chiba; Mitsuko Kawano; Masafumi Nakayama; Kouetsu Ogasawara; Yutaka Yabe; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Coating CoCrMo Alloy with Graphene Oxide and ε-Poly-L-Lysine Enhances Its Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties.

Authors:  Jianbin Guo; Guihua Cao; Xing Wang; Wenhao Tang; Weilong Diwu; Ming Yan; Min Yang; Long Bi; Yisheng Han
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-10-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.