Stacey J Howell1, Ezra A Amsterdam2, Bryn E Mumma3, Javier E López2, Nam K Tran4. 1. From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA. 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Implementation of the newly approved high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) in the United States presents a challenge for clinical practice. Sex-specific cutoffs, clinical protocols, and workflows will likely require modifications before implementation. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of international physicians and laboratorians already utilizing hs-cTn for the evaluation of acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 54 (41%) eligible participants completed the survey, representing 9 countries and 18 hospitals. All reported successful hs-cTn implementation and diagnostic utility (mean 8.6 + 1.2 out of 10 for best implementation). The major perceived benefit was more rapid evaluation of acute myocardial infarction (14/19, 74%), and the most frequently cited limitation was an increase in the number of measurable hs-cTn values that required further evaluation (8/18, 44%). Institutions using the hs-cTnI assay favored sex-specific cutoffs (5/6, 83%), whereas institutions employing the hs-cTnT assay favored a combined cutoff (12/12, 100%). Timing of serial hs-cTn measurements varied, with 0-3 hours (8/17, 47%) most frequent, followed by 0-2 hours (4/17, 24%), 0-1 hour (3/17, 18%), and other (2/17, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey of hs-cTn implementation at international institutions reveals satisfaction with new assays but reflects important variations in clinical practice. The use of sex-specific vs. combined cutoffs and timing of serial hs-cTn measurements varies across institutions and are subjects that United States centers must define without consensus from international practices.
OBJECTIVE: Implementation of the newly approved high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) in the United States presents a challenge for clinical practice. Sex-specific cutoffs, clinical protocols, and workflows will likely require modifications before implementation. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of international physicians and laboratorians already utilizing hs-cTn for the evaluation of acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 54 (41%) eligible participants completed the survey, representing 9 countries and 18 hospitals. All reported successful hs-cTn implementation and diagnostic utility (mean 8.6 + 1.2 out of 10 for best implementation). The major perceived benefit was more rapid evaluation of acute myocardial infarction (14/19, 74%), and the most frequently cited limitation was an increase in the number of measurable hs-cTn values that required further evaluation (8/18, 44%). Institutions using the hs-cTnI assay favored sex-specific cutoffs (5/6, 83%), whereas institutions employing the hs-cTnT assay favored a combined cutoff (12/12, 100%). Timing of serial hs-cTn measurements varied, with 0-3 hours (8/17, 47%) most frequent, followed by 0-2 hours (4/17, 24%), 0-1 hour (3/17, 18%), and other (2/17, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey of hs-cTn implementation at international institutions reveals satisfaction with new assays but reflects important variations in clinical practice. The use of sex-specific vs. combined cutoffs and timing of serial hs-cTn measurements varies across institutions and are subjects that United States centers must define without consensus from international practices.
Authors: Fred S Apple; Allan S Jaffe; Paul Collinson; Martin Mockel; Jordi Ordonez-Llanos; Bertil Lindahl; Judd Hollander; Mario Plebani; Martin Than; M H M Chan Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2014-09-07 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Tobias Reichlin; Louise Cullen; William A Parsonage; Jaimi Greenslade; Raphael Twerenbold; Berit Moehring; Karin Wildi; Sandra Mueller; Christa Zellweger; Tamina Mosimann; Maria Rubini Gimenez; Katharina Rentsch; Stefan Osswald; Christian Müller Journal: Am J Med Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Till Keller; Tanja Zeller; Dirk Peetz; Stergios Tzikas; Alexander Roth; Ewa Czyz; Christoph Bickel; Stephan Baldus; Ascan Warnholtz; Meike Fröhlich; Christoph R Sinning; Medea S Eleftheriadis; Philipp S Wild; Renate B Schnabel; Edith Lubos; Nicole Jachmann; Sabine Genth-Zotz; Felix Post; Viviane Nicaud; Laurence Tiret; Karl J Lackner; Thomas F Münzel; Stefan Blankenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andreas Roos; Nadia Bandstein; Magnus Lundbäck; Ola Hammarsten; Rickard Ljung; Martin J Holzmann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anoop S V Shah; Megan Griffiths; Kuan Ken Lee; David A McAllister; Amanda L Hunter; Amy V Ferry; Anne Cruikshank; Alan Reid; Mary Stoddart; Fiona Strachan; Simon Walker; Paul O Collinson; Fred S Apple; Alasdair J Gray; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-01-21
Authors: Matthias Mueller-Hennessen; Bertil Lindahl; Evangelos Giannitsis; Moritz Biener; Mehrshad Vafaie; Christopher R deFilippi; Michael Christ; Miguel Santalo-Bel; Mauro Panteghini; Mario Plebani; Franck Verschuren; Tomas Jernberg; John K French; Robert H Christenson; Richard Body; James McCord; Peter Dilba; Hugo A Katus; Christian Mueller Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Marco Roffi; Carlo Patrono; Jean-Philippe Collet; Christian Mueller; Marco Valgimigli; Felicita Andreotti; Jeroen J Bax; Michael A Borger; Carlos Brotons; Derek P Chew; Baris Gencer; Gerd Hasenfuss; Keld Kjeldsen; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ulf Landmesser; Julinda Mehilli; Debabrata Mukherjee; Robert F Storey; Stephan Windecker Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Edward Hyun Suh; Aleksandr M Tichter; Lauren S Ranard; Andrew Amaranto; Betty C Chang; Phong Anh Huynh; Alexander Kratz; Rebekah Jihae Lee; LeRoy E Rabbani; Dana Sacco; Andrew J Einstein Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2022-05-05
Authors: Bryn E Mumma; Scott D Casey; Robert K Dang; Michelle K Polen; Jasmanpreet C Kaur; John Rodrigo; Daniel J Tancredi; Robert A Narverud; Ezra A Amsterdam; Nam Tran Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 5.721