Rachel Harwood1,2, Fraser Horwood3, Violeta Tafilaj4, Ross J Craigie3. 1. Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Rachel.Harwood@liverpool.ac.uk. 2. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Rachel.Harwood@liverpool.ac.uk. 3. Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. 4. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of intra-operative Trans-anastomotic Tube (TAT) placement on the cost of post-operative nutrition in infants with congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing corrective surgery for CDO, with birth-weight over 1.5 kg over a 10-year period. Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) and analysed with Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: 59 patients were included. There was no difference between TAT and non-TAT groups for baseline characteristics, age at operation and abnormality. In the TAT group there was a significant reduction in the duration of post-operative parenteral nutrition (PN) [6 (0-11) vs 12 (8-19) days, p = 0.006], the cost of PN [£750 (0-1375) vs £1500 (1000-2375), p = 0.006] and the total cost of nutrition [£765.26 (38.36-1404) vs £1387.52 (1008.23-2363.08), p = 0.015], thereby demonstrating a median cost saving of £622.26 per patient. 14% experienced TAT displacement but no other TAT complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: The use of a TAT is a safe and effective way to reduce the duration of PN required in patients with CDO. This infers a significant cost saving per patient, a factor that cannot be overlooked in this period of austerity.
PURPOSE: To determine the impact of intra-operative Trans-anastomotic Tube (TAT) placement on the cost of post-operative nutrition in infants with congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing corrective surgery for CDO, with birth-weight over 1.5 kg over a 10-year period. Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) and analysed with Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: 59 patients were included. There was no difference between TAT and non-TAT groups for baseline characteristics, age at operation and abnormality. In the TAT group there was a significant reduction in the duration of post-operative parenteral nutrition (PN) [6 (0-11) vs 12 (8-19) days, p = 0.006], the cost of PN [£750 (0-1375) vs £1500 (1000-2375), p = 0.006] and the total cost of nutrition [£765.26 (38.36-1404) vs £1387.52 (1008.23-2363.08), p = 0.015], thereby demonstrating a median cost saving of £622.26 per patient. 14% experienced TAT displacement but no other TAT complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: The use of a TAT is a safe and effective way to reduce the duration of PN required in patients with CDO. This infers a significant cost saving per patient, a factor that cannot be overlooked in this period of austerity.
Authors: George Stephen Bethell; Anna-May Long; Marian Knight; Nigel J Hall Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 5.747