Literature DB >> 34212223

Trans-anastomotic tube feeding in the management of congenital duodenal obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Netravati Biradar1, Parshotam Gera1, Shripada Rao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Feed intolerance is a common problem in neonates with congenital duodenal obstruction (CDO). Some surgeons insert trans-anastomotic tubes (TAT) to facilitate feed tolerance. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TATs in CDO.
METHODS: Medline, EmBase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched till July 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using Random Effects Model.
RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials addressing the question were identified. In the 6 included observational studies, 96 infants underwent intraoperative TAT placement and 117 did not. Four studies reported benefits of TAT such as early attainment of full feeds and decreased need for parenteral nutrition. Two studies reported better outcomes in the no-TAT group. Accidental removal of TAT without clinical harm was reported in three studies [5/37 (14%), 4/17 (23%), and 2/4 (50%)]. Overall meta-analysis found no differences between the groups on any outcome. However, sensitivity analysis after excluding two studies with high risk of bias found that TAT tubes are associated with shorter duration of PN and shorter time to full enteral feeds. GRADE of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is limited regarding the efficacy and safety of intraoperative TAT placement in neonates with CDO. Well-designed RCTs are needed to address the issue definitively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital duodenal obstruction; Feed intolerance; Parenteral nutrition; Trans anastomotic tube

Year:  2021        PMID: 34212223     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-021-04954-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  18 in total

1.  Transanastomotic feeding tube after an operation for duodenal atresia.

Authors:  E Arnbjörnsson; M Larsson; Y Finkel; B Karpe
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.191

2.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Major complications of jejunal feeding in children.

Authors:  Conor McCann; Paul S Cullis; Amanda J McCabe; Fraser D Munro
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  The relationship between disturbed transit and dilated bowel, and manometric findings of dilated bowel in patients with duodenal atresia and stenosis.

Authors:  A Takahashi; T Tomomasa; N Suzuki; M Kuroiwa; H Ikeda; A Morikawa; S Matsuyama; Y Tsuchida
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Duodenal atresia and stenosis: long-term follow-up over 30 years.

Authors:  Mauricio A Escobar; Alan P Ladd; Jay L Grosfeld; Karen W West; Frederick J Rescorla; L R Scherer; Scott A Engum; Thomas M Rouse; Deborah F Billmire
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  The role of parenteral nutrition following surgery for duodenal atresia or stenosis.

Authors:  M Bishay; B Lakshminarayanan; A Arnaud; M Garriboli; K M Cross; J I Curry; D Drake; E M Kiely; P De Coppi; A Pierro; S Eaton
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

Authors:  Jonathan Ac Sterne; Miguel A Hernán; Barnaby C Reeves; Jelena Savović; Nancy D Berkman; Meera Viswanathan; David Henry; Douglas G Altman; Mohammed T Ansari; Isabelle Boutron; James R Carpenter; An-Wen Chan; Rachel Churchill; Jonathan J Deeks; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Jamie Kirkham; Peter Jüni; Yoon K Loke; Theresa D Pigott; Craig R Ramsay; Deborah Regidor; Hannah R Rothstein; Lakhbir Sandhu; Pasqualina L Santaguida; Holger J Schünemann; Beverly Shea; Ian Shrier; Peter Tugwell; Lucy Turner; Jeffrey C Valentine; Hugh Waddington; Elizabeth Waters; George A Wells; Penny F Whiting; Julian Pt Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-12

9.  Comparison of outcomes between complete and incomplete congenital duodenal obstruction.

Authors:  Stefan Gfroerer; Till-Martin Theilen; Henning C Fiegel; Anoosh Esmaeili; Udo Rolle
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A modern cohort of duodenal obstruction patients: predictors of delayed transition to full enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Sigrid Bairdain; David C Yu; Chueh Lien; Faraz Ali Khan; Bhavana Pathak; Matthew J Grabowski; David Zurakowski; Bradley C Linden
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2014-08-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Is postoperative transanastomotic feeding beneficial in neonates with congenital duodenal obstruction?

Authors:  Martin Treider; Anders Hauge Engebretsen; Hans Skari; Kristin Bjørnland
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Postoperative feeding in neonatal duodenal obstruction.

Authors:  Dolrudee Aroonsaeng; Paul D Losty; Pornsri Thanachatchairattana
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.567

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.