Literature DB >> 30417031

Artificial Inhalation Protocol in Adult Mice.

Thomas P Eiting1, Matt Wachowiak1.   

Abstract

Research in the area of in vivo olfactory physiology benefits from having direct access to the nasal airways through which odorants can be presented. Ordinarily, the passage of odorants through the airways is controlled by respiratory rhythm. This fact makes it difficult to control the timing and strength of an olfactory stimulus, since animals must breathe regularly, and the act of breathing itself also controls odorant presentation. However, using an artificial inhalation preparation allows us to decouple breathing from olfaction. With this technique we present oxygen and anesthetic (if desired) to the lungs directly and independently control odorant access to the nasal passages. This technique allows for direct control of odorant presentation in vivo, enabling more precise control of parameters of stimulation when investigating olfactory processing. This technique may have additional applications, for example in aerosolized drug delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inhalation; Nasopharynx; Olfaction; Respiration; Tracheotomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417031      PMCID: PMC6221193          DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bio Protoc        ISSN: 2331-8325


  8 in total

1.  Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  M Wachowiak; L B Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dynamic ensemble odor coding in the mammalian olfactory bulb: sensory information at different timescales.

Authors:  Brice Bathellier; Derek L Buhl; Riccardo Accolla; Alan Carleton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Cholinergic inputs from Basal forebrain add an excitatory bias to odor coding in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Markus Rothermel; Ryan M Carey; Adam Puche; Michael T Shipley; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Interglomerular center-surround inhibition shapes odorant-evoked input to the mouse olfactory bulb in vivo.

Authors:  Dejan Vucinić; Lawrence B Cohen; Efstratios K Kosmidis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Timing of odor stimulation does not alter patterning of olfactory bulb unit activity in freely breathing rats.

Authors:  E C Sobel; D W Tank
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of Mitral/Tufted Cell Output by Selective Inhibition among Olfactory Bulb Glomeruli.

Authors:  Michael N Economo; Kyle R Hansen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Optical dissection of odor information processing in vivo using GCaMPs expressed in specified cell types of the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak; Michael N Economo; Marta Díaz-Quesada; Daniela Brunert; Daniel W Wesson; John A White; Markus Rothermel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Differential Impacts of Repeated Sampling on Odor Representations by Genetically-Defined Mitral and Tufted Cell Subpopulations in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.

Authors:  Renata Medinaceli Quintela; Jennifer Bauer; Lutz Wallhorn; Kim Le; Daniela Brunert; Markus Rothermel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Mapping odorant sensitivities reveals a sparse but structured representation of olfactory chemical space by sensory input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shawn D Burton; Audrey Brown; Thomas P Eiting; Isaac A Youngstrom; Thomas C Rust; Michael Schmuker; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Dynamics of Glutamatergic Drive Underlie Diverse Responses of Olfactory Bulb Outputs In Vivo.

Authors:  Andrew K Moran; Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Circuit Contributions to Sensory-Driven Glutamatergic Drive of Olfactory Bulb Mitral and Tufted Cells During Odorant Inhalation.

Authors:  Andrew K Moran; Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.