| Literature DB >> 30415495 |
Philippe Lemay1, Patrizia De Marco2, Monica Traverso2, Elisa Merello2, Alexandre Dionne-Laporte3, Dan Spiegelman3, Édouard Henrion3, Ousmane Diallo3, François Audibert1,4, Jacques L Michaud1,5, Armando Cama2, Guy A Rouleau3, Zoha Kibar1,6, Valeria Capra2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neural tube defects (NTD) are among the most common defects affecting 1:1000 births. They are caused by a failure of neural tube closure during development. Their clinical presentation is diverse and dependent on the site and severity of the original defect on the embryonic axis. The etiology of NTD is multifactorial involving environmental factors and genetic variants that remain largely unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Molecular inversion probes (MIP) resequencing; Neural tube defects (NTD); candidate genes; whole exome sequencing (WES)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30415495 PMCID: PMC6382446 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Figure 1Representation of the eight neural tube defects affected families included in this study. The three families previously analyzed by our group are denoted by a star. Myelomeningocele (MMC), spina bifida occulta (SBO), vertebral schisis (VS), dermal sinus (DS), sacral agenesis (SA), anencephaly (Anen), myelocele (MC), and lypomyeloschisis (LMS)
Novel loss‐of‐function variants identified in Neural Tube Defects patients
| Family ID | Chr | Position | Gene | cDNA change | Protein change | GnomAD | ExAc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 224–414 | 1 | 11851333 |
| c.1683G>A | (p.(Trp561Ter) | – | – |
| 3646 | 8 | 13357460 |
| c.121C>T | (p.(Gln41Ter) | – | – |
| 25 | 8 | 12957469 |
| c.1066C>T | (p.(Gln356Ter) | – | – |
| 260 | 10 | 33197323 |
| c.2303_2304insA | (p.(Lys768 fs) | – | – |
| 270 | 12 | 99042236 |
| c.99_100insT | (p.(Gly33 fs) | – | – |
Accession numbers: MTHFR (NM_005957.4); DLC1 (NM_006094.4); ITGB1 (NM_133376.2); APAF1 (NM_181868.1).
Figure 2A schematic representation of MTHFR (a), DLC1 (b), and ITGB1 (c) indicating the position of the four novel loss‐of‐function variants identified in Neural Tube Defects patients
Figure 3Graphical representation of the MYO1E protein indicating the position of Neural Tube Defects (NTD)‐associated variants. Variants identified by whole exome sequencing or by MIP sequencing are on top and bottom sides of the protein, respectively. Variants identified in NTD patients are indicated by green arrows and those in controls by red arrows
Variants identified in the MYO1E [Link] gene in neural tube defects (NTD) patients and controls
| Family ID | Type | Chr | Position | cDNA change | Protein change | rs number | EVS frequency | gnomAD frequency | PolyPhen score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole exome sequencing cohort | |||||||||
| 201 | NTD | 15 | 59519746 | c.554A>G | (p.(Asp185Gly) | rs141565214 | 0.001157 | 0.002103 | 0.99 |
| 265/553 | NTD | 15 | 59506892 | c.1135C>G | (p.(His379Asp) | rs150983259 | 0.001543 | 0.001320 | 0.982 |
| 28/552 | NTD | 15 | 59497622 | c.1593C>G | (p.(Ile531Met) | rs140447165 | 0.006480 | 0.007179 | 0.988 |
| 389 | NTD | 15 | 59464193 | c.2383G>A | (p.(Gly795Arg) | rs180951130 | 0.000077 | 0.0005989 | 0.997 |
| 574 | Control | 15 | 59453352 | c.2705G>C | (p.(Gly902Ala) | – | 0 | – | 0.993 |
| MIPS cohort | |||||||||
| 10179 | NTD | 15 | 59564608 | c.A2365G | (p.(Lys789Glu) | rs542281660 | 0 | 1.840 e‐5 | 0.925 |
| 10194 | NTD | 15 | 59564603 | c.G2345A | (p.(Arg782Gln) | – | 0 | – | 0.93 |
| 10278 | NTD | 15 | 59519746 | c.A554G | (p.(Asp185Gly) | rs141565214 | 0.001157407 | 0.002103 | 0.866 |
| 10190 | NTD | 15 | 59464231 | c.A49G | (p.(Lys17Glu) | – | 0 | 1.625 e‐5 | 0.85 |
| 10322 | NTD | 15 | 59464211 | c.A44G | (p.(Asn15Ser) | – | 0 | 2.031 e‐5 | 0.901 |
| 20871 | Control | 15 | 59519705 | c.G595T | (p.(Val199Leu) | – | 0 | 8.122 e‐6 | 0.848 |
| 20785 | Control | 15 | 59519746 | c.A554G | (p.(Asp185Gly) | rs141565214 | 0.001157407 | 0.002103 | 0.866 |
MYOE accession number (NM_004998.3).