Literature DB >> 30413857

Ultrafast pediatric chest computed tomography: comparison of free-breathing vs. breath-hold imaging with and without anesthesia in young children.

Aya Kino1, Evan J Zucker2, Anita Honkanen3, Jerry Kneebone2, Jia Wang4, Frandics Chan2, Beverley Newman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) or sedation has been used to obtain good-quality motion-free breath-hold chest CT scans in young children; however pulmonary atelectasis is a common and problematic accompaniment that can confound diagnostic utility. Dual-source multidetector CT permits ultrafast high-pitch sub-second examinations, minimizing motion artifact and potentially eliminating the need for a breath-hold.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing ultrafast pediatric chest CT without GA and to compare it with breath-hold and non-breath-hold CT with GA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Young (≤3 years old) pediatric outpatients scheduled for chest CT under GA were recruited into the study and scanned using one of three protocols: GA with intubation, lung recruitment and breath-hold; GA without breath-hold; and free-breathing CT without anesthesia. In all three protocols an ultrafast high-pitch CT technique was used. We evaluated CT images for overall image quality, presence of atelectasis and motion artifacts.
RESULTS: We included 101 scans in the study. However the GA non-breath-hold technique was discontinued after 15 scans, when it became clear that atelectasis was a major issue despite diligent attempts to mitigate it. This technique was therefore not included in statistical evaluation (86 remaining patients). Overall image quality was higher (P=0.001) and motion artifacts were fewer (P<.001) for scans using the GA with intubation and recruitment technique compared to scans in the non-GA free-breathing group. However no significant differences were observed regarding the presence of atelectasis between these groups.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that although overall image quality was best and motion artifact least with a GA-breath-hold intubation and recruitment technique, free-breathing ultrafast pediatric chest CT without anesthesia provides sufficient image quality for diagnostic purposes and can be successfully performed both without and with contrast agent in young infants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Chest; Children; Computed tomography; Free breathing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30413857     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4295-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  13 in total

1.  Atelectasis on pediatric chest CT: comparison of sedation techniques.

Authors:  M A Sargent; A M McEachern; D H Jamieson; R Kahwaji
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Reduced frequency of sedation of young children with multisection helical CT.

Authors:  J N Pappas; L F Donnelly; D P Frush
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Sedation versus general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing chest CT.

Authors:  W W Lam; P P Chen; N M So; C Metreweli
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Balancing the Risks of Radiation and Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Tucker; Sanjay K Jain; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Comparison of different methods of calculating CT radiation effective dose in children.

Authors:  Beverley Newman; Arundhuti Ganguly; Jee-Eun Kim; Terry Robinson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Pulmonary atelectasis during paediatric anaesthesia: CT scan evaluation and effect of positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP).

Authors:  G Serafini; G Cornara; F Cavalloro; A Mori; R Dore; G Marraro; A Braschi
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.

Authors:  Paul D Deak; Yulia Smal; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  High-pitch spiral computed tomography: effect on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael M Lell; Matthias May; Paul Deak; Sedat Alibek; Michael Kuefner; Axel Kuettner; Henrik Köhler; Stephan Achenbach; Michael Uder; Tanja Radkow
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between High-Pitch Mode and Low-Pitch Mode Spiral Chest CT in Small Uncooperative Children: The Effect of Respiratory Rate.

Authors:  Seong Ho Kim; Young Hun Choi; Hyun-Hae Cho; So Mi Lee; Su-Mi Shin; Jung-Eun Cheon; Woo Sun Kim; In-One Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effects of recruitment maneuver on atelectasis in anesthetized children.

Authors:  Gerardo Tusman; Stephan H Böhm; Alejandro Tempra; Fernando Melkun; Eduardo García; Elsio Turchetto; Paul G H Mulder; Burkhard Lachmann
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  7 in total

1.  High-pitch CT, decreasing need for sedation and its potential side effects: some practical considerations and future directions.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-12-10

Review 2.  Assessing and conveying risks and benefits of imaging in neonates using ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia.

Authors:  Gary R Schooler; Joseph P Cravero; Michael J Callahan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-07-20

Review 3.  Should I irradiate with computed tomography or sedate for magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Joseph P Cravero
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Outpatient Respiratory Management of Infants, Children, and Adolescents with Post-Prematurity Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  A Ioana Cristea; Clement L Ren; Reshma Amin; Laurie C Eldredge; Jonathan C Levin; Parevi P Majmudar; Anne E May; Rebecca S Rose; Michael C Tracy; Karen F Watters; Julian Allen; Eric D Austin; Mary E Cataletto; Joseph M Collaco; Robert J Fleck; Andrew Gelfand; Don Hayes; Marcus H Jones; Sheila S Kun; Erica W Mandell; Sharon A McGrath-Morrow; Howard B Panitch; Rizwana Popatia; Lawrence M Rhein; Alejandro Teper; Jason C Woods; Narayan Iyer; Christopher D Baker
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs. Oral Chloral Hydrate for Sedation in Children Undergoing Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Lyu; Yujuan Tao; Xiujing Dang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  Dual-source computed tomography protocols for the pediatric chest - scan optimization techniques.

Authors:  Jordan B Rapp; Victor M Ho-Fung; Karen I Ramirez; Ammie M White; Hansel J Otero; David M Biko
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-11

7.  Surveillance recommendations for DICER1 pathogenic variant carriers: a report from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group and CanGene-CanVar Clinical Guideline Working Group.

Authors:  Jette J Bakhuizen; Helen Hanson; Karin van der Tuin; Fiona Lalloo; Marc Tischkowitz; Karin Wadt; Marjolijn C J Jongmans
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.