Literature DB >> 15347720

18F-FDG kinetics and gene expression in giant cell tumors.

Ludwig G Strauss1, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Dirk Koczan, Ludger Bernd, Uwe Haberkorn, Volker Ewerbeck, Hans-Jürgen Thiesen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: 18F-FDG kinetics were evaluated by use of compartment and noncompartment models of giant cell tumors. The kinetic data were compared with the gene expression data for a subgroup of patients.
METHODS: Nineteen patients with giant cell tumors were examined with PET and 18F-FDG, and tracer kinetics were assessed quantitatively. A 2-compartment model, including the transport constants k1-k4 as well as the vascular fraction (VB) for 18F-FDG, was used for evaluation of the data. A noncompartment model was used to calculate the fractal dimension of the 18F-FDG time-activity curve to assess the heterogeneity of the tracer kinetics. Furthermore, tumor specimens obtained from 5 patients were assessed with gene chip technology (U95A), and these data were compared with the quantitative 18F-FDG data.
RESULTS: The giant cell tumors showed generally enhanced 18F-FDG uptake 1 h after tracer application, with a mean 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) of 4.8 (range, 1.8-9.4). Quantitative evaluation of tracer kinetics showed a preferential increase for 18F-FDG transport, with a mean k1 of 0.340. The vascular fraction accounted for 35% of the tumor volume and was high compared with those for other tumors, such as soft-tissue sarcomas. 18F-FDG kinetics were heterogeneous, with a fractal dimension of 1.3. Gene chip analysis showed that the expression of 137 genes (1.1%) exceeded the median expression value of the reference gene, beta2-microglobulin. The highest expression was observed for the gene for the small, leucine-rich proteoglycan I (biglycan), which is important for bone cell differentiation and proliferative activity. Correlation analysis revealed an association of 18F-FDG data with the expression of several genes. Mainly genes related to angiogenesis were associated with the compartment parameters. The SUV at 56-60 min was correlated with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (angiogenesis) and cell division cycle 2 protein (proliferation).
CONCLUSION: Despite their classification as benign tumors, giant cell tumors have generally enhanced 18F-FDG uptake, mainly attributable to an enhanced vascular fraction and increased 18F-FDG transport. A comparison of gene chip data and 18F-FDG kinetic data showed a close association of quantitative 18F-FDG results and the expression of genes related to angiogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15347720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  30 in total

1.  Giant cell tumor of soft tissue: a case report with emphasis on MR imaging.

Authors:  Moon Young Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Chan Kwon Jung; Ie Ryung Yoo; Yang-Guk Chung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Metachronous, multicentric giant cell tumor of the sphenoid bone with histologic, CT, MR imaging, and positron-emission tomography/CT correlation.

Authors:  A M McKinney; P Reichert; J Short; T Dhurairaj; K SantaCruz; Z McKinney; S Kieffer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Luigi Cavanna; Claudia Biasini; Michela Monfredo; Pietro Maniscalco; Monica Mori
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-11

4.  Adding variables to complexity. Molecular imaging and molecular biology: a no-longer-secret liaison in NETs.

Authors:  Annibale Versari; Alessia Ciarrocchi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Personalized medicine: a new option for nuclear medicine and molecular imaging in the third millennium.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Nicoletta Urbano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  The biology of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in bone pathophysiology.

Authors:  Dragana Nikitovic; John Aggelidakis; Marian F Young; Renato V Iozzo; Nikos K Karamanos; George N Tzanakakis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Diagnostic value of kinetic analysis using dynamic FDG PET in immunocompetent patients with primary CNS lymphoma.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Yuka Yamamoto; Toshihide Monden; Yasuhiro Sasakawa; Nobuyuki Kawai; Katashi Satoh; Motoomi Ohkawa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Dynamic PET with (18)F-Deoxyglucose (FDG) and quantitative assessment with a two-tissue compartment model reflect the activity of glucose transporters and hexokinases in patients with colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Dirk Koczan; Sven Klippel; Leyun Pan; Stefan Willis; Christos Sachpekidis; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-19

Review 9.  Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Authors:  Yifeng He; Ji Zhang; Xiaoyi Ding
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Early effects of FOLFOX treatment of colorectal tumour in an animal model: assessment of changes in gene expression and FDG kinetics.

Authors:  Ludwig G Strauss; Johannes Hoffend; Dirk Koczan; Leyun Pan; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.