Literature DB >> 30413542

Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial.

Tara Kiran1, Sam Davie2, Rahim Moineddin2, Aisha Lofters2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is good evidence that cancer-specific patient outreach improves rates of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening. However, it is unclear how primary care practices should implement integrated outreach for all 3 types of cancer screening. We aimed to understand whether integrated outreach using mailed letters or phone calls were more effective at increasing screening uptake in a primary care organization.
METHOD: We conducted a pragmatic randomized trial comparing outreach by mailed letter or personalized phone call for patients overdue for cervical, breast, or colorectal cancer screening. The study was conducted at 6 clinics within an academic primary care organization in Toronto, Canada. Our primary outcome was an uptake of at least 1 screening test for which the patient was overdue. Our primary analysis was an intention-to-treat, unadjusted comparison of proportions, using a χ2 test. We also compared costs per additional patient screened. All analyses were stratified by sex.
RESULTS: A total of 3733 females and 1537 males were randomized to receive 1 of the interventions. Among women, 33.0% allocated to receive a reminder letter and 41.2% allocated to receive a reminder phone call received at least 1 screening test for which they were due (absolute difference, 8.1%; 95% CI, 5.1%-11.2%, P < .001). Among men, 24.8% allocated to receive a reminder letter and 28.8% allocated to a reminder phone call received screening for colorectal cancer (absolute difference, 4.1%; 95% CI, -0.4% to 8.5%, P = .073). For women and men, the letters cost approximately CaD $5.07 and CaD $7.16, respectively, for each completed screening test compared with CaD $8.71 and CaD $12.00 for the phone calls.
CONCLUSIONS: Phone calls were more effective than mailed letters at increasing uptake for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among women. However, phone calls were more expensive than letters. Primary care practices should consider integrating phone call reminders into their practice, possibly as part of a targeted or staged approach to outreach for cancer screening. © Copyright 2018 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer; Canada; Cervical Cancer; Colorectal Cancer; Early Detection of Cancer; Intention to Treat Analysis; Primary Health Care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30413542     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.170369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  5 in total

1.  Utilization of clinical genetic counseling among childhood and young adult cancer survivors in a registry trial.

Authors:  Nassim Anderson; Arash Delavar; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Vijai Joseph; Nidha Mubdi; Kevin C Oeffinger; Charles A Sklar; Kenneth Offit; Matthew Matasar; Nirupa Raghunathan; Zoltan Antal; David Straus; Michael Walsh; Alicia Latham; Emily S Tonorezos
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-07-16

2.  A "Tea and Cookies" Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income.

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Natalie A Baker; Andree Schuler; Allison Rau; Alison Baxter; Nancy N Baxter; Edward Kucharski; Fok-Han Leung; Karen Weyman; Tara Kiran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Advanced Notification Calls Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test in Previously Screened Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Briton Lee; Shreya Patel; Carly Rachocki; Rachel Issaka; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06

5.  The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Alison Beauchamp; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Annie Cooper; Vicki Pridmore; Patricia Livingston; Matthew Scanlon; Melissa Davis; Jonathan O'Hara; Richard Osborne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.