| Literature DB >> 30412744 |
Xiaopan Li1, Mengcen Qian2, Genming Zhao3, Chen Yang4, Pingping Bao5, Yichen Chen1, Xiaoyan Zhou6, Bei Yan4, Yingying Wang4, Jun Zhang6, Qiao Sun4.
Abstract
Despite the rising disease burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), CRC screening has not yet been widely introduced as a large organized program in developing countries. To facilitate better delivery of screening in these areas, we investigated the performance of a large community-based CRC screening program implemented in Shanghai Pudong New Area during the period 2013-2016. We conducted a prospective cohort study by following up the screening behavior and results of tested participants in the program. Data from the program reporting system and monthly progress reports were collected. We used standard measures and indicators with modifications to evaluate the performance of the program. Disparities in CRC screening by age categories, primary screening results, and geographic areas were examined. A total of 403,098 individuals participated in the program, 25,764 of them were further screened by diagnostic colonoscopy (COL), and 505 people were eventually diagnosed with CRC as a result of the program. The program produced the following rates: participation (35.18%), primary screening positivity (24.89%), positive primary screening follow-up (26.26%), diagnostic COL (6.37%), and cancer detection (1.25‰). Vast variations in the quality of the program were observed across areas with different socioeconomic environments. The experience and lessons from the program suggest that incorporating the screening with other public health campaigns, using better-developed risk assessment tools, and allowing individual screening decisions for those aged above the target are possible practical ways to promote a better delivery of organized CRC screening programs.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer screening program; Colorectal cancer; Performance evaluation; Program implementation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30412744 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med ISSN: 0091-7435 Impact factor: 4.018