Literature DB >> 30411432

Implementing recovery-oriented interventions with staff in a psychiatric hospital: A mixed-methods study.

Tzipi Hornik-Lurie1, Anat Shalev2,3, Lior Haknazar2, Paula Garber Epstein4, Linor Ziedenberg-Rehav3, Galia S Moran2.   

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Recovery-oriented care is a means of providing mental health treatment, focused on the patient's individual needs and active involvement in one's own care. However, this approach presents with challenges, particularly in psychiatric hospitals, which tend to be focused on symptom reduction. WHAT DOES THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This study examines the influence of three different recovery-oriented training programmes/interventions (namely, illness management and recovery, peer support, and psychiatric advance directives) on the attitudes and practice of mental health staff (including nurses) in an inpatient setting, using a mixed-methods methodology. We quantitatively assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices developed following recovery-oriented training, compared to staff not trained in these interventions. We interviewed staff exposed to the different interventions to learn about their personal views and characterized the benefits and challenges they experienced. Mainly, the illness management and recovery training created a positive change in the work attitude and some work-related practices of mental health staff and the increased presence of a person-centred approach supporting patient autonomy. However, and contrary to expectations, there was no increase in practices that support personal goals or provide individually tailored services. Peer support had an experiential impact among mental health staff, initiating a more humane, positive approach to patients. Psychiatric advance directives were reported as more challenging to implement and with limited impact. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Recovery-oriented trainings can be internalized and implemented by staff in medical model psychiatric settings. Despite recovery-oriented training, challenges do occur-notably, they are hardest to implement in acute wards/patient states and by psychiatric nurses. Using multiple recovery-oriented programmes/interventions can accelerate the momentum for change in traditional settings and promote positive practice. Ongoing comprehensive mental health staff training on recovery-oriented care programmes is essential in order to sustain change over time. Training is not enough in itself-hospital administrations need to be actively involved in promoting recovery-oriented policies. ABSTRACT: Introduction Developing person-centred recovery-oriented care is a challenge in mental health systems, particularly psychiatric hospitals. Aim To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices developed following recovery-oriented training of nurses and other staff; to identify the benefits and challenges involved in the implementation of recovery-oriented intervention in psychiatric wards. Method A mixed-methods study compared recovery knowledge, attitudes and practices of 37 mental health ward staff trained in recovery-oriented intervention, against 35 staff not trained. Fifteen staff were interviewed about their experiences, and protocols were qualitatively analysed. Results The quantitative outcomes partially confirmed positive changes in attitudes and some practices. Qualitative interviews complemented these findings, revealing greater use of a person-centred approach and support for patient autonomy. However, we did not find differences between groups in quantitative outcomes pertaining to personal goals or providing individually tailored services. Discussion This study validates the implementation of recovery training and practices in psychiatric settings, and identifies the challenges involved. We discuss psychiatric nurse conflicts in implementation in acute wards. Implications for practice Our findings support the need for broader staff training in recovery-oriented interventions. Recruiting the support of the hospital administration for recovery-oriented intervention programmes is key, both ethically and structurally.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advocacy; alternative interventions; mental health promotion; nursing education; recovery; staff perceptions‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30411432     DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  5 in total

1.  Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation.

Authors:  Johanne Eliacin; Jessica Carter; Emily Bass; Mindy Flanagan; Michelle P Salyers; Alan McGuire
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Investigating the factor structure of a translated recovery-orientation instrument in inpatient treatment for substance use disorder.

Authors:  Dagny Adriaenssen Johannessen; Amy Østertun Geirdal; Trond Nordfjærn
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2021-03-19

3.  Experiences of healthcare staff providing community-based mental healthcare as a multidisciplinary community mental health team in Central and Eastern Europe findings from the RECOVER-E project: an observational intervention study.

Authors:  Catharina Roth; Michel Wensing; Martina Rojnic Kuzman; Sarah Bjedov; Sara Medved; Ana Istvanovic; Danijela Stimac Grbic; Ivana Pavic Simetin; Aleksandar Tomcuk; Jovo Dedovic; Tatijana Djurisic; Raluca Ileana Nica; Tiberiu Rotaru; Antoni Novotni; Stojan Bajraktarov; Milos Milutinovic; Vladimir Nakov; Zahari Zarkov; Roumyana Dinolova; Bethany Hipple Walters; Laura Shields-Zeeman; Ionela Petrea
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Staff experiences related to implementation of a recovery-oriented nursing programme in psychiatric inpatient care.

Authors:  Johanna Salberg; Lisa Ekselius; Timo Hursti; Caisa Öster
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  Safewards Secure: A Delphi study to develop an addition to the Safewards model for forensic mental health services.

Authors:  Tessa Maguire; Jo Ryan; Rachael Fullam; Brian McKenna
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.720

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.