Literature DB >> 30410732

Dengvaxia controversy: impact on vaccine hesitancy.

Khunsha Fatima1, Najah Irfan Syed2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30410732      PMCID: PMC6214489          DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.020312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glob Health        ISSN: 2047-2978            Impact factor:   7.664


× No keyword cloud information.
Dengue is a viral infection found in tropical and sub-tropical climates worldwide [1]. It is the most rapidly spreading mosquito-borne viral disease [2]. During the past five decades, the global incidence of dengue has risen 30-fold, with the disease now endemic in more than 100 countries [1,2]. So far there is no specific treatment for dengue infection [1]. The quest for a suitable vaccine for dengue has been ongoing for the last six decades [3]. In one such effort, Sanofi, one of the biggest multinational pharmaceutical companies, developed the world’s first dengue vaccine - Dengvaxia. The vaccine is now approved in 19 countries and was used in vaccination campaigns in Philippines, involving more than 800 000 school children [4,5]. Photo: Gabriela Metro Manila holds protest at DOH main office today over poor government response to Dengvaxia fiasco. Photo by Manila Today (used with permission) Soon after its authorization, Dengvaxia has now become a subject to controversy following Sanofi’s recent analysis which suggests that the vaccine may put some people at an increased risk of a more severe form of dengue [5]. Dengvaxia was found to reduce the overall risk of severe dengue and hospitalizations due to this disease [4]. This protection, however, was more apparent in those who had a prior history of dengue infection. Sanofi recently discovered that individuals who have never had a dengue infection before pose a significantly higher risk of a more severe form of the disease and hospitalizations with Dengvaxia than if they had not been vaccinated against dengue at all [4]. Considering dengue infection rates reach up to 90% in Philippines, majority of the school children who were inoculated with Dengvaxia will get the protective benefits of the vaccine [5]. This projection, however, means that at least 10% or around 80 000 of those children who do not have a prior history of dengue infection are now at an increased risk of developing severe dengue [6]. Dengvaxia’s sale and distribution has been suspended in Philippines but due to the fear resulting from this controversy, parents are now refusing to vaccinate their children even against vaccine preventable diseases, giving rise to a phenomenon known as Vaccine Hesitancy [7]. “Vaccine hesitancy” refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of safe vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services. Even today, 1 in 5 children worldwide fail to receive routine immunization, and about 1.5 million children die each year of diseases that could be prevented by vaccination [8]. Concern over vaccine safety is one of the most dominant reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Earlier, these concerns were mainly due to widely circulating media reports highlighting a rare occurrence of an adverse reaction to a vaccine, or associating certain disorders to vaccines or their components [9]. Most of these concerns, however, were based on rumors rather than the facts and yet somehow managed to instill fear in the hearts and minds of parents. Unfortunately, the crisis that we are dealing with now is based on results from clinical trials backed up by autopsies linking some deaths to Dengvaxia [6]. These findings may serve as proof against vaccine safety and might have a negative impact on other vaccination programs. With the news being widely circulated through media, this would not just affect Philippines but also other parts of the world. In light of the above discussion, it is necessary to educate the public regarding safety and success of all other available vaccines through mass education programs, awareness campaigns and conferences to overcome fear and confusion. Media can play a key role in eliminating misconceptions and skepticism resulting from this controversy. Highlighting the positive roles and benefits vaccination campaigns possess may prove to be efficacious as previous vaccination programs have had a tremendous success rate in reducing the mortality and morbidity of various infectious diseases worldwide. It must be emphasized that this particular crisis should not be linked with other vaccines and that the medical sector should be trusted in the formation of newer dengue vaccines. Considering the scale and scope of this issue, all government and non-government health care authorities must work together in efforts to regain parents’ trust. WHO, being a global organization, should play its part in supporting and sustaining public health by helping prevent a drop in vaccination rates and ensuring the acceptability of future vaccines.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of dengue virus and the development of a vaccine.

Authors:  Sarah Murrell; Suh-Chin Wu; Michael Butler
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 14.227

2.  Exploring the Reasons Behind Parental Refusal of Vaccines.

Authors:  Chephra McKee; Kristin Bohannon
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
  2 in total
  25 in total

1.  Micronutrients, Immunological Parameters, and Dengue Virus Infection in Coastal Ecuador: A Nested Case-Control Study in an Infectious Disease Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Julia L Finkelstein; Susannah Colt; Alexander J Layden; Jesse T Krisher; Anna M Stewart-Ibarra; Mark Polhemus; Efraín Beltrán-Ayala; Julia M Tedesco; Washington B Cárdenas; Timothy Endy; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Cluster Analysis of Dengue Morbidity and Mortality in Mexico from 2007 to 2020: Implications for the Probable Case Definition.

Authors:  Carlos M Baak-Baak; Nohemi Cigarroa-Toledo; Jose F Pinto-Castillo; Rosa C Cetina-Trejo; Oswaldo Torres-Chable; Bradley J Blitvich; Julian E Garcia-Rejon
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.707

3.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model for the Treatment of Dengue Infections Applied to the Broad Spectrum Antiviral Soraphen A.

Authors:  Katharina Rox; Maxi Heyner; Jana Krull; Kirsten Harmrolfs; Valtteri Rinne; Juho Hokkanen; Gemma Perez Vilaro; Juana Díez; Rolf Müller; Andrea Kröger; Yuichi Sugiyama; Mark Brönstrup
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-08-30

4.  The Challenges of Vaccine Development against Betacoronaviruses: Antibody Dependent Enhancement and Sendai Virus as a Possible Vaccine Vector.

Authors:  T A Zaichuk; Y D Nechipurenko; A A Adzhubey; S B Onikienko; V A Chereshnev; S S Zainutdinov; G V Kochneva; S V Netesov; O V Matveeva
Journal:  Mol Biol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 1.374

5.  Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission.

Authors:  Jue Tao Lim; Borame Sue Lee Dickens; Lawrence Zheng Xiong Chew; Esther Li Wen Choo; Joel Ruihan Koo; Joel Aik; Lee Ching Ng; Alex R Cook
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-10-29

6.  Activity of vitamin D receptor agonists against dengue virus.

Authors:  Janejira Jaratsittisin; Bin Xu; Wannapa Sornjai; Zhibing Weng; Atichat Kuadkitkan; Feng Li; Guo-Chun Zhou; Duncan R Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A small molecule inhibitor of ER-to-cytosol protein dislocation exhibits anti-dengue and anti-Zika virus activity.

Authors:  Jingjing Ruan; Hussin A Rothan; Yongwang Zhong; Wenjing Yan; Mark J Henderson; Feihu Chen; Shengyun Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  The control of soil-transmitted helminthiases in the Philippines: the story continues.

Authors:  Donald P McManus; Darren J Gray; Mary Lorraine S Mationg; Veronica L Tallo; Gail M Williams; Catherine A Gordon; Archie C A Clements
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 10.485

9.  Current vector research challenges in the greater Mekong subregion for dengue, Malaria, and Other Vector-Borne Diseases: A report from a multisectoral workshop March 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca C Christofferson; Daniel M Parker; Hans J Overgaard; Jeffrey Hii; Gregor Devine; Bruce A Wilcox; Vu Sinh Nam; Sazaly Abubakar; Sebastien Boyer; Kobporn Boonnak; Stephen S Whitehead; Rekol Huy; Leang Rithea; Tho Sochantha; Thomas E Wellems; Jesus G Valenzuela; Jessica E Manning
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-07-30

10.  Quantitative evaluation of protective antibody response induced by hepatitis E vaccine in humans.

Authors:  Gui-Ping Wen; Linling He; Zi-Min Tang; Si-Ling Wang; Xu Zhang; Yuan-Zhi Chen; Xiaohe Lin; Chang Liu; Jia-Xin Chen; Dong Ying; Zi-Hao Chen; Ying-Bin Wang; Wen-Xin Luo; Shou-Jie Huang; Shao-Wei Li; Jun Zhang; Zi-Zheng Zheng; Jiang Zhu; Ning-Shao Xia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.