Literature DB >> 30408848

Concizumab restores thrombin generation potential in patients with haemophilia: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling results of concizumab phase 1/1b data.

Hermann Eichler1, Pantep Angchaisuksiri2, Kaan Kavakli3, Paul Knoebl4, Jerzy Windyga5, Victor Jiménez-Yuste6, Philip Harder Delff7, Pratima Chowdary8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Concizumab enhances thrombin generation (TG) potential in haemophilia patients by inhibiting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). In EXPLORER3 (phase 1b), a dose-dependent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship was confirmed between concizumab dose, free TFPI and TG potential. AIM: Determine the association between concizumab exposure, PD markers (free TFPI; peak TG) and bleeding episodes to establish the minimum concizumab concentration for achieving sufficient efficacy.
METHODS: Free TFPI predictions were generated using an estimated concizumab-free TFPI exposure-response (Emax ) model based on concizumab phase 1/1b data for which simultaneously collected concizumab and free TFPI samples were available. Concizumab concentration at the time of a bleed was predicted using a PK model, based on available data for concizumab doses >50 μg/kg to ≤9 mg/kg. Peak TG vs concizumab concentration analyses and an Emax model were constructed based on EXPLORER3 observations.
RESULTS: The Emax model showed a tight PK/PD relationship between concizumab exposure and free TFPI; free TFPI decreased with increasing concizumab concentration. A strong correlation between concizumab concentration and peak TG was observed; concizumab >100 ng/mL re-established TG potential to within the normal reference range. Estimated EC50 values for the identified concizumab-free TFPI and concizumab-TG potential models were very similar, supporting free TFPI as an important biomarker. A correlation between bleeding episode frequency and concizumab concentration was indicated; patients with a concizumab concentration >100 ng/mL experienced less frequent bleeding. The PK model predicted that once-daily dosing would minimize within-patient concizumab PK variability.
CONCLUSION: Concizumab phase 2 trials will target an exposure ≥100 ng/mL, with a once-daily regimen.
© 2018 The Authors. Haemophilia Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  concizumab; haemophilia; modelling; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; phase 1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30408848     DOI: 10.1111/hae.13627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  9 in total

1.  Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results.

Authors:  Amy D Shapiro; Pantep Angchaisuksiri; Jan Astermark; Gary Benson; Giancarlo Castaman; Pratima Chowdary; Hermann Eichler; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Kaan Kavakli; Tadashi Matsushita; Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen; Allison P Wheeler; Guy Young; Silva Zupancic-Salek; Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Treatment Options in Hemophilia.

Authors:  Wolfgang Miesbach; Joachim Schwäble; Markus M Müller; Erhard Seifried
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  A Molecular Revolution in the Treatment of Hemophilia.

Authors:  John S S Butterfield; Kerry M Hege; Roland W Herzog; Radoslaw Kaczmarek
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Current progress and future direction in the treatment for hemophilia.

Authors:  Midori Shima
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Use of population PK/PD approach to model the thrombin generation assay: assessment in haemophilia A plasma samples spiked by a TFPI antibody.

Authors:  Raphaël Crépin; Claire Morin; Aurélie Montmartin; Brigitte Tardy-Poncet; Pierre Chelle
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Novel treatments for hemophilia through rebalancing of the coagulation cascade.

Authors:  Yakun Zhao; Angela C Weyand; Jordan A Shavit
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Managing Severe Hemophilia A in Children: Pharmacotherapeutic Options.

Authors:  Katherine Regling; Michael U Callaghan; Robert Sidonio
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors.

Authors:  Amy D Shapiro; Pantep Angchaisuksiri; Jan Astermark; Gary Benson; Giancarlo Castaman; Hermann Eichler; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Kaan Kavakli; Tadashi Matsushita; Lone Hvitfeldt Poulsen; Allison P Wheeler; Guy Young; Silva Zupančić-Šalek; Johannes Oldenburg; Pratima Chowdary
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 9.  Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review.

Authors:  Marieke J A Verhagen; Lars L F G Valke; Saskia E M Schols
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 16.036

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.