Leslie P Scheunemann1, Ramy Khalil2, Padma S Rajagopal3, Robert M Arnold4. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: scheunemannlp@upmc.edu. 2. St. Clair Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Palliative and Supportive Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: There are no evidence-based programs to train physicians to facilitate shared decision making based on incapacitated intensive care unit patients' values and preferences. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop a high-fidelity simulation to fill this gap. METHODS: Case development involved six steps: 1) drafting a case about an elderly patient receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation; 2) engaging an expert advisory board to optimize case content; 3) revising the case based on advisory board input; 4) training actors to portray the case patient's daughter; 5) obtaining physician feedback on the simulation; and 6) revising the case based on their feedback. We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study with 50 physicians to assess feasibility and acceptability, defined a priori as an enrollment rate >40 physicians/year, study procedures <75 minutes/participant, >95% actor adherence to standardization rules, and high physician ratings of realism and acceptability. RESULTS: Advisory panel feedback yielded two modifications: 1) refocusing the case on decision making about tracheostomy and percutaneous gastrostomy and 2) making the patient's values more authentic. Physician feedback yielded two additional modifications: 1) reducing how readily the actor divulged the patient's values and 2) making her more emotional. All 50 physicians enrolled in the pilot study over 11 months completed study procedures in <75 minutes. Actor adherence to standardization rules was 95.8%. Physicians' mean ratings of realism and acceptability were 8.4 and 9.1, respectively, on a 10-point scale. CONCLUSION: Simulation is feasible, is acceptable, and can be adequately standardized to study physicians' skills for facilitating surrogate decision making based on an incapacitated intensive care unit patient's values and preferences.
CONTEXT: There are no evidence-based programs to train physicians to facilitate shared decision making based on incapacitated intensive care unit patients' values and preferences. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop a high-fidelity simulation to fill this gap. METHODS: Case development involved six steps: 1) drafting a case about an elderly patient receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation; 2) engaging an expert advisory board to optimize case content; 3) revising the case based on advisory board input; 4) training actors to portray the case patient's daughter; 5) obtaining physician feedback on the simulation; and 6) revising the case based on their feedback. We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study with 50 physicians to assess feasibility and acceptability, defined a priori as an enrollment rate >40 physicians/year, study procedures <75 minutes/participant, >95% actor adherence to standardization rules, and high physician ratings of realism and acceptability. RESULTS: Advisory panel feedback yielded two modifications: 1) refocusing the case on decision making about tracheostomy and percutaneous gastrostomy and 2) making the patient's values more authentic. Physician feedback yielded two additional modifications: 1) reducing how readily the actor divulged the patient's values and 2) making her more emotional. All 50 physicians enrolled in the pilot study over 11 months completed study procedures in <75 minutes. Actor adherence to standardization rules was 95.8%. Physicians' mean ratings of realism and acceptability were 8.4 and 9.1, respectively, on a 10-point scale. CONCLUSION: Simulation is feasible, is acceptable, and can be adequately standardized to study physicians' skills for facilitating surrogate decision making based on an incapacitated intensive care unit patient's values and preferences.
Authors: Leslie P Scheunemann; Thomas V Cunningham; Robert M Arnold; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Douglas B White Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Daren K Heyland; Peter Dodek; Graeme Rocker; Dianne Groll; Amiram Gafni; Deb Pichora; Sam Shortt; Joan Tranmer; Neil Lazar; Jim Kutsogiannis; Miu Lam Journal: CMAJ Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jared Chiarchiaro; Rachel A Schuster; Natalie C Ernecoff; Amber E Barnato; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-04