Marion C Lanteri1,2, Tamir Kanias3,4, Sheila Keating1,2, Mars Stone1,2, Yuelong Guo5, Grier P Page5, Donald J Brambilla6, Stacy M Endres-Dighe6, Alan E Mast7, Walter Bialkowski7, Pam D'Andrea8, Ritchard G Cable9, Bryan R Spencer9, Darrell J Triulzi8,10, Edward L Murphy1,2, Steven Kleinman11, Mark T Gladwin3,4, Michael P Busch1,2. 1. Vitalant Research Institute (previously Blood Systems Research Institute), University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 3. Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. RTI International, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. RTI International, Rockville, Maryland. 7. Blood Research and Medical Sciences Institutes, Blood Center of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 8. The Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 9. American Red Cross, Farmington, Connecticut. 10. Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 11. University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic determinants may underlie the susceptibility of red blood cells (RBCs) to hemolyze in vivo and during routine storage. This study characterized the reproducibility and dynamics of in vitro hemolysis variables from a subset of the 13,403 blood donors enrolled in the RBC-Omics study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RBC-Omics donors with either low or high hemolysis results on 4°C-stored leukoreduced (LR)-RBC samples from enrollment donations stored for 39 to 42 days were recalled 2 to 12 months later to donate LR-RBCs. Samples of stored LR-RBCs from the unit and from transfer bags were evaluated for spontaneous and stress-induced hemolysis at selected storage time points. Intradonor reproducibility of hemolysis variables was evaluated in transfer bags over two donations. Hemolysis data at serial storage time points were generated on LR-RBCs from parent bags and analyzed by site, sex, race/ethnicity, and donation frequency. RESULTS: A total of 664 donors were successfully recalled. Analysis of intradonor reproducibility revealed that osmotic and oxidative hemolysis demonstrated good and moderate reproducibility (Pearson's r = 0.85 and r = 0.53, respectively), while spontaneous hemolysis reproducibility was poor (r = 0.40). Longitudinal hemolysis in parent bags showed large increases over time in spontaneous (508.6%) and oxidative hemolysis (399.8%) and smaller increases in osmotic (9.4%) and mechanical fragility (3.4%; all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Spontaneous hemolysis is poorly reproducible in donors over time and may depend on site processing methods, while oxidative and osmotic hemolysis were reproducible in donors and hence could reflect consistent heritable phenotypes attributable to genetic traits. Spontaneous and oxidative hemolysis increased over time of storage, whereas osmotic and mechanical hemolysis remained relatively stable.
BACKGROUND: Genetic determinants may underlie the susceptibility of red blood cells (RBCs) to hemolyze in vivo and during routine storage. This study characterized the reproducibility and dynamics of in vitro hemolysis variables from a subset of the 13,403 blood donors enrolled in the RBC-Omics study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: RBC-Omics donors with either low or high hemolysis results on 4°C-stored leukoreduced (LR)-RBC samples from enrollment donations stored for 39 to 42 days were recalled 2 to 12 months later to donate LR-RBCs. Samples of stored LR-RBCs from the unit and from transfer bags were evaluated for spontaneous and stress-induced hemolysis at selected storage time points. Intradonor reproducibility of hemolysis variables was evaluated in transfer bags over two donations. Hemolysis data at serial storage time points were generated on LR-RBCs from parent bags and analyzed by site, sex, race/ethnicity, and donation frequency. RESULTS: A total of 664 donors were successfully recalled. Analysis of intradonor reproducibility revealed that osmotic and oxidative hemolysis demonstrated good and moderate reproducibility (Pearson's r = 0.85 and r = 0.53, respectively), while spontaneous hemolysis reproducibility was poor (r = 0.40). Longitudinal hemolysis in parent bags showed large increases over time in spontaneous (508.6%) and oxidative hemolysis (399.8%) and smaller increases in osmotic (9.4%) and mechanical fragility (3.4%; all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:Spontaneous hemolysis is poorly reproducible in donors over time and may depend on site processing methods, while oxidative and osmotic hemolysis were reproducible in donors and hence could reflect consistent heritable phenotypes attributable to genetic traits. Spontaneous and oxidative hemolysis increased over time of storage, whereas osmotic and mechanical hemolysis remained relatively stable.
Authors: J S Raval; J H Waters; A Seltsam; E A Scharberg; E Richter; A R Daly; M V Kameneva; M H Yazer Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: Mars Stone; Sheila M Keating; Tamir Kanias; Marion C Lanteri; Mila Lebedeva; Derek Sinchar; Dylan Hampton; Adam Jakub; Val Rychka; Greg Brewer; Sonia Bakkour; Nelly Gefter; Karla Murcia; Grier P Page; Stacy Endres-Dighe; Walter Bialkowski; Xiaoyun Fu; Jim Zimring; Thomas J Raife; Steve Kleinman; Mark T Gladwin; Michael P Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Yuelong Guo; Michael P Busch; Mark Seielstad; Stacy Endres-Dighe; Connie M Westhoff; Brendan Keating; Carolyn Hoppe; Aarash Bordbar; Brian Custer; Adam S Butterworth; Tamir Kanias; Alan E Mast; Steve Kleinman; Yontao Lu; Grier P Page Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Matthew S Karafin; Roberta Bruhn; Matt Westlake; Marian T Sullivan; Walter Bialkowski; Gustaf Edgren; Nareg H Roubinian; Ronald G Hauser; Daryl J Kor; Debra Fleischmann; Jerome L Gottschall; Edward L Murphy; Darrell J Triulzi Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Vassilis L Tzounakas; Hara T Georgatzakou; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Artemis I Voulgaridou; Konstantinos E Stamoulis; Leontini E Foudoulaki-Paparizos; Marianna H Antonelou; Issidora S Papassideri Journal: Transfusion Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Jaroslav G Vostal; Paul W Buehler; Monique P Gelderman; Abdu I Alayash; Alan Doctor; James C Zimring; Simone A Glynn; John R Hess; Harvey Klein; Jason P Acker; Philip C Spinella; Angelo D'Alessandro; Bernhard Palsson; Thomas J Raife; Michael P Busch; Timothy J McMahon; Marcos Intaglietta; Harold M Swartz; Michael A Dubick; Sylvain Cardin; Rakesh P Patel; Charles Natanson; John W Weisel; Jennifer A Muszynski; Philip J Norris; Paul M Ness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Tamir Kanias; Mars Stone; Grier P Page; Yuelong Guo; Stacy M Endres-Dighe; Marion C Lanteri; Bryan R Spencer; Ritchard G Cable; Darrell J Triulzi; Joseph E Kiss; Edward L Murphy; Steve Kleinman; Mark T Gladwin; Michael P Busch; Alan E Mast Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Rosa de Groot; Jeroen Lakerveld; Johannes Brug; Johan W Lagerberg; Dirk de Korte; Trynke Hoekstra; Wim L A M de Kort; Katja van den Hurk Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Davide Stefanoni; Xiaoyun Fu; Julie A Reisz; Tamir Kanias; Travis Nemkov; Grier P Page; Larry Dumont; Nareg Roubinian; Mars Stone; Steve Kleinman; Michael Busch; James C Zimring; Angelo D'Alessandro Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Angelo D'Alessandro; Xiaoyun Fu; Julie A Reisz; Mars Stone; Steve Kleinman; James C Zimring; Michael Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Nareg H Roubinian; Colleen Plimier; Jennifer P Woo; Catherine Lee; Roberta Bruhn; Vincent X Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Steven H Kleinman; Darrell J Triulzi; Edward L Murphy; Michael P Busch Journal: Blood Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Angelo D'Alessandro; Xiaoyun Fu; Julie A Reisz; Tamir Kanias; Grier P Page; Mars Stone; Steve Kleinman; James C Zimring; Michael Busch Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Richard O Francis; Angelo D'Alessandro; Andrew Eisenberger; Mark Soffing; Randy Yeh; Esther Coronel; Arif Sheikh; Francesca Rapido; Francesca La Carpia; Julie A Reisz; Sarah Gehrke; Travis Nemkov; Tiffany Thomas; Joseph Schwartz; Chaitanya Divgi; Debra Kessler; Beth H Shaz; Yelena Ginzburg; James C Zimring; Steven L Spitalnik; Eldad A Hod Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 14.808