Literature DB >> 27028307

Donor variation effect on red blood cell storage lesion: a multivariable, yet consistent, story.

Vassilis L Tzounakas1, Hara T Georgatzakou1, Anastasios G Kriebardis2, Artemis I Voulgaridou3, Konstantinos E Stamoulis4,5, Leontini E Foudoulaki-Paparizos5, Marianna H Antonelou1, Issidora S Papassideri1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that baseline hematologic characteristics concerning or influencing red blood cell (RBC) properties might affect storage lesion development in individual donors. This study was conducted to evaluate whether variation in hemolysis, microparticle accumulation, phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, and other storage lesion-associated variables might be a function of the prestorage hematologic and biologic profiles of the donor. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten eligible, regular blood donors were paired and studied before donation (fresh blood) and during storage of RBCs in standard blood banking conditions. Plasma and cellular characteristics and modifications were evaluated by standard laboratory and biochemical or biologic analyses as well as by statistical and network analysis tools.
RESULTS: Nitrate/nitrite and other bioactive factors exhibited high interdonor variability, which further increased during storage in a donor-specific manner. Storage lesion evaluators, including RBC fragility and PS exposure, fluctuated throughout the storage period in proportion to their values in fresh blood. Donors' levels of phosphatidylserine exposure and hemoglobin F correlated with stored cells' mean cell (RBC) Hb concentration, oxidative stress markers, and cellular fragility. DISCUSSION: Storage lesion indicators change in an orderly fashion, namely, by following donor-related prestorage attributes. These correlations are illustrated for the first time in "prestorage versus storage" biologic networks, which might help determine the best candidates for in vivo biomarkers of storage quality and provide deeper insight into the apparently complex donor variation effect on the RBC storage lesion.
© 2016 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028307     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  38 in total

1.  Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during red blood cell storage: results of recall phase of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study.

Authors:  Marion C Lanteri; Tamir Kanias; Sheila Keating; Mars Stone; Yuelong Guo; Grier P Page; Donald J Brambilla; Stacy M Endres-Dighe; Alan E Mast; Walter Bialkowski; Pam D'Andrea; Ritchard G Cable; Bryan R Spencer; Darrell J Triulzi; Edward L Murphy; Steven Kleinman; Mark T Gladwin; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  Omics markers of the red cell storage lesion and metabolic linkage.

Authors:  Angelo D'alessandro; Travis Nemkov; Julie Reisz; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Matthew J Wither; Kirk C Hansen
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  Duration of red blood cell storage and inflammatory marker generation.

Authors:  Caroline Sut; Sofiane Tariket; Ming Li Chou; Olivier Garraud; Sandrine Laradi; Hind Hamzeh-Cognasse; Jerard Seghatchian; Thierry Burnouf; Fabrice Cognasse
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Unraveling the Gordian knot: red blood cell storage lesion and transfusion outcomes.

Authors:  Vassilis L Tzounakas; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Jerard Seghatchian; Issidora S Papassideri; Marianna H Antonelou
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Red blood cells ageing markers: a multi-parametric analysis.

Authors:  Manon Bardyn; Benjamin Rappaz; Keyvan Jaferzadeh; David Crettaz; Jean-Daniel Tissot; Inkyu Moon; Gerardo Turcatti; Niels Lion; Michel Prudent
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Frequent blood donations alter susceptibility of red blood cells to storage- and stress-induced hemolysis.

Authors:  Tamir Kanias; Mars Stone; Grier P Page; Yuelong Guo; Stacy M Endres-Dighe; Marion C Lanteri; Bryan R Spencer; Ritchard G Cable; Darrell J Triulzi; Joseph E Kiss; Edward L Murphy; Steve Kleinman; Mark T Gladwin; Michael P Busch; Alan E Mast
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 7.  Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.

Authors:  Tatsuro Yoshida; Michel Prudent; Angelo D'alessandro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Processing methods and storage duration impact extracellular vesicle counts in red blood cell units.

Authors:  Clementine Gamonet; Maxime Desmarets; Guillaume Mourey; Sabeha Biichle; Sophie Aupet; Caroline Laheurte; Anne François; Eric Resch; Frédéric Bigey; Delphine Binda; Laurent Bardiaux; Christian Naegelen; Nadine Marpaux; Fanny Angelot Delettre; Philippe Saas; Pascal Morel; Pierre Tiberghien; Jacques Lacroix; Gilles Capellier; Chrystelle Vidal; Francine Garnache-Ottou
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

9.  Acetylcholinesterase provides new insights into red blood cell ageing in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Joames K Freitas Leal; Merel J W Adjobo-Hermans; Roland Brock; Giel J C G M Bosman
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 10.  Red blood cell storage time and transfusion: current practice, concerns and future perspectives.

Authors:  María García-Roa; María Del Carmen Vicente-Ayuso; Alejandro M Bobes; Alexandra C Pedraza; Ataúlfo González-Fernández; María Paz Martín; Isabel Sáez; Jerard Seghatchian; Laura Gutiérrez
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.